Cytotoxic drugs, hormones, antihormones, and biologic agents have become increasingly effective means of treating cancer. Many patients are treated on protocols to provide optimal therapy for refractory or poorly responsive malignancies. Treatment may be inadequate or ineffective because of drug resistance of the tumor cells. This has been attributed to spontaneous genetic mutations in subpopulations of cancer cells prior to exposure to chemotherapy. After chemotherapy has eliminated the sensitive cells, the resistant subpopulation grows to become the predominant cell type (Goldie-Coldman hypothesis). This has been the basis of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy regimens. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance are now the subject of intense study. In many instances, specific drug resistance results from an amplification in the number of gene copies for an enzyme inhibited by a specific chemotherapeutic agent. A more general form of "multidrug resistance" (MDR) has been described in association with expression of a gene (MDR1) encoding a transmembrane glycoprotein of MW 170 (P-glycoprotein) on tumor cells. This protein is an energy-dependent transport pump that facilitates drug efflux from tumor cells and promotes resistance to a broad spectrum of unrelated cancer drugs. Acquired multidrug resistance in multiple myeloma and lymphoma has been reversed clinically by adding the calcium channel blocker verapamil to chemotherapy regimens. Unfortunately, the doses of verapamil required to overcome drug resistance are associated with cardiovascular side effects. High doses of cyclosporine appear to increase the cytotoxicity of etoposide both in vitro and in vivo, probably by inhibiting the function of P-glycoprotein. The use of cyclosporine to enhance the effect of etoposide in purging resistant tumor cells in vitro from autologous bone marrow is under investigation. Cyclosporine has also been shown to enhance the cytotoxic effect of multiagent chemotherapy against resistant multiple myeloma. Verapamil and cyclosporine increase the accumulation and cytotoxicity of daunorubicin in myeloid leukemia cells, enhancing cell kill. MDR modulators will need to be both less toxic and more potent to be clinically useful. An example is the cyclosporine analog PSC 833, with little of the immunosuppressive effects or renal toxicities of cyclosporine but with five- to tenfold greater MDR-modulating activity. Chemotherapy is used to cure a small percentage of malignancies, as adjuvant therapy to decrease the rate of relapse or improve the disease-free interval, and to palliate symptoms in some patients with incurable malignancies. In addition, chemotherapy may play a role as preoperative or "neoadjuvant" therapy to reduce the size and extent of the primary tumor, thereby allowing complete excision at the time of surgery. Chemotherapy was first shown to be curative in the treatment of advanced stages of choriocarcinoma in women. It is also curative in Hodgkin's disease, diffuse large-cell and some high-grade lymphomas (including Burkitt's), carcinoma of the testis, some cases of acute leukemia, and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. When combined with initial surgery—and in some instances with irradiation—chemotherapy increases the cure rate in Wilms' tumor and increases the rate of long-term control and cure of breast cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer, and osteogenic sarcomas. Combination chemotherapy provides palliation and prolongation of survival in adults with Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, mycosis fungoides, multiple myeloma and macroglobulinemia, acute and chronic leukemias, and breast, ovary, and small-cell lung carcinoma as well as carcinoid. Patients with incurable tumors who desire aggressive treatment should be referred for experimental protocol therapy. Tumor cell vaccines combined with immune adjuncts are under investigation as specific immunotherapy for chemotherapy-resistant tumors such as malignant melanoma. High-dose chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation is curative therapy for various types of leukemia, multiple myeloma, and high-risk lymphoma and testicular cancer. Allogeneic or autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells with or without ex vivo purging is used depending on the disease. The use of growth factors and blood stem cells has decreased the toxicity and cost of bone marrow transplantation. Autologous transplantation may now be used with low morbidity and mortality on selected patients up to age 70. In addition, dose-intense chemotherapy regimens with autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue are currently being investigated in the high-risk adjuvant or early relapse setting for patients with carcinoma of the breast and ovaries. A small study suggests that intensive doses of chemotherapy followed by bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell infusion in incurable diseases such as metastatic breast cancer may prolong survival. It is possible that this aggressive approach may be useful even when "cure" is not the objective. While most anticancer drugs are used systemically, there are selected indications for local or regional administration. Regional administration involves direct infusion of active chemotherapeutic agents into the tumor site (eg, intravesical therapy, intraperitoneal therapy, hepatic artery infusion with or without embolization of the main blood supply of the tumor). These treatments can result in palliation and prolonged survival. A summary of the types of cancer responsive to chemotherapy and the current treatments of choice is offered in Table 4–3. In some instances (eg, Hodgkin's disease), optimal therapy may require a combination of therapeutic resources, eg, radiation plus chemotherapy rather than either modality alone. Patients with stages I, II, and IIIA Hodgkin's disease are often treated with radiation alone, avoiding the potential toxicity of systemic chemotherapy. A small percentage of these patients may require chemotherapy later for disease recurrence.
Table 4–3. Treatment choices for cancers responsive to systemic agents.
Diagnosis
Acute lymphocytic leukemia
Acute myelocytic and myelomonocytic leukemia
Chronic myelocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Hairy cell leukemia Hodgkin’s disease (stages III and IV)
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Multiple myeloma
Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia
Polycythemia vera
Carcinoma of lung Small cell Non-small cell3
Carcinoma of the head and neck3 Carcinoma of the esophagus3 Carcinoma of the stomach and pancreas3
Carcinoma of the colon and rectum3
Carcinoma of the kidney3
Carcinoma of the bladder3
Carcinoma of the testis3
Carcinoma of the prostate3
Carcinoma of the uterus3 Carcinoma of the ovary3
Carcinoma of the cervix3
Carcinoma of the breast3
Current Treatment of Choice
Induction: Combination chemotherapy. Adults:
Vincristine, prednisone, daunorubicin, and asparaginase.
Children: Vincristine, prednisone with or without
asparaginase.
Consolidation: Multiagent alternating chemotherapy.
Allogeneic bone marrow transplant for young adults or
high-risk disease or second remission. CNS prophylaxis
with intrathecal methotrexate with or without whole brain
radiation.
Remission maintenance: Methotrexate, thioguanine.
Induction: Combination chemotherapy with cytarabine
and an anthracycline (daunorubicin, idarubicin).
Tretinoin for acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Consolidation: High-dose cytarabine. Autologous
(with or without purging) or allogeneic bone marrow
transplantation for high-risk disease or second remission.
Hydroxyurea, alpha interferon. Allogeneic bone marrow
transplantation for young patients.
Chlorambucil and prednisone or fludarabine (if treatment
is indicated).
Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine; CdA).
Combination chemotherapy: doxorubicin (Adriamycin),
bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) or
mechlorethamine, vincristine, prednisone, procarbazine
(MOPP) or alternating MOPP/ABVD or MOPP/ABV,
autologous bone marrow transplant for high-risk patients
or relapsed disease.
Combination therapy depending on histologic classification
but usually including cyclophosphamide, vincristine,
doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHOP) with or without
other agents. Autologous bone marrow transplantation in
high-risk first remission or first relapse.
Combination chemotherapy: melphalan and prednisone
or melphalan, cyclophosphamide, carmustine,
vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone. Autologous
bone marrow transplantation in first complete or partial
remission. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for
young patients with poor prognosis disease.
Chlorambucil versus combination chemotherapy:
cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone. Allogeneic
bone marrow transplantation for high-risk young patients.
Hydroxyurea, phlebotomy
Combination chemotherapy: cisplatin and etoposide.
Palliative radiation therapy.
Advanced disease: cisplatin, vinorelbine
Localized disease: cisplatin, vinblastine
Combination chemotherapy: cisplatin and fluorouracil
Combination chemotherapy: fluorouracil, cisplatin,
mitomycin
Stomach: etoposide, leucovorin,2 fluorouracil (ELF)
Pancreas: fluorouracil or ELF, gemcitabine
Colon: fluorouracil plus levamisole (adjuvant) or with
leucovorin.2
Rectum: fluorouracil with radiation therapy (adjuvant)
Floxuridine, vinblastine, IL-2, alpha interferon
Intravesical BCG or thiotepa. Combination
chemotherapy: methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin
(Adriamycin), cisplatin (M-VAC) or CMV alone
Combination chemotherapy: etoposide and cisplatin
Autologous bone marrow transplantation for high-risk or
relapsed disease.
Estrogens or LHRH analog (leuprolide) plus an
antiandrogen (flutamide)
Progestins or tamoxifen
Combination chemotherapy: cyclophosphamide and
cisplatin (or carboplatin) or paclitaxel and cisplatin/
carboplatin
Combination chemotherapy: methotrexate,
doxorubicin, cisplatin, and vinblastine; or mitomycin,
bleomycin, vincristine, and cisplatin
Combination chemotherapy: cyclophosphamide,
doxorubicin, fluorouracil, or cyclophosphamide,
methotrexate, fluorouracil. Tamoxifen for estrogen/
progesterone receptor-positive tumors. Adjuvant therapy
for high-risk patients and for limited metastatic disease:
Other Valuable Agents and Procedures
Doxorubicin, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, teniposide (VM-26),1 allopurinol,2 autologous bone marrow transplantation
Mitoxantrone, idarubicin, etoposide,
mercaptopurine, thioguanine,
azacitidine,1 amsacrine,1
methotrexate, doxorubicin, tretinoin,
allopurinol,2 leukapheresis, prednisone
Busulfan, mercaptopurine,
thioguanine, cytarabine, plicamycin, melphalan,
autologous bone marrow transplantation, allopurinol2
Vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin,
Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine; CdA),
androgens,2 allopurinol2
Pentostatin (deoxycoformycin), alpha interferon
Carmustine, lomustine, etoposide,
thiotepa, autologous bone marrow transplantation
Bleomycin, methotrexate, etoposide,
chlorambucil, fludarabine, lomustine, carmustine,
cytarabine, thiotepa, amsacrine, mitoxantrone,
autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
Etoposide, cytarabine, alpha interferon,
dexamethasone, autologous bone marrow
transplantation
Etoposide, alpha interferon, doxorubicin,
dexamethasone, plasmapheresis, autologous bone
marrow transplantation
Busulfan, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide, alpha
interferon, radiophosphorus 32P
Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine
Doxorubicin, etoposide, mitomycin
Methotrexate, bleomycin,
hydroxyurea, doxorubicin, vinblastine
Methotrexate, bleomycin,
doxorubicin, mitomycin
Carmustine, mitomycin, lomustine,
doxorubicin, gemcytidine.
Doxorubicin, methotrexate, cisplatin, combinations
for stomach
Methotrexate, mitomycin, carmustine,
cisplatin, floxuridine
Alpha interferon, progestins, infusional FUDR,
fluorouracil
Cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil
Bleomycin, vinblastine, ifosfamide,
mesna,2 carmustine, carboplatin
Ketoconazole, doxorubicin,
aminoglutethimide, progestins, cyclophosphamide,
cisplatin, estramustine, vinblastine, etoposide,
suramin1
Doxorubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil, ifosfamide
Docetaxel, topotecan
Carboplatin, ifosfamide, lomustine
Mitoxantrone, vinblastine, paclitaxel,
docetaxel, topotecan, thiotepa, vincristine,
carboplatin, cisplatin/carboplatin, mitomycin,
vinorelbine, progestins, androgens, aminoglutethimide
Choriocarcinoma (trophoblastic neoplasms)3 Dose intensification or autologous bone marrow transplantation. Methotrexate or dactinomycin (or both) plus chlorambucil Vinblastine, cisplatin, mercaptopurine, doxorubicin, bleomycin, etoposide
Carcinoma of the thyroid gland3 Carcinoma of the adrenal Radioiodine (131I) Mitotane Doxorubicin, cisplatin, bleomycin, melphalan Doxorubicin, suramin1
gland3 Carcinoid3 Osteogenic sarcoma3 Soft tissue sarcoma3 Melanoma3 Kaposi’s sarcoma Wilms’ tumor (in children)3 Neuroblastoma3 Fluorouracil plus streptozocin with or without alpha interferon High-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, vincristine Doxorubicin, dacarbazine Dacarbazine, alpha interferon, IL-2 Vincristine alternating with vinblastine or vincristine alone. Palliative radiation therapy. Combination chemotherapy: vincristine and dactinomycin with or without doxorubicin after surgery and radiation therapy Combination chemotherapy: variations of cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, dacarbazine Doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, octreotide, cyproheptadine,2 methysergide2 Cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, bleomycin, dacarbazine, cisplatin, dactinomycin Ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate, vincristine Carmustine, lomustine, melphalan, thiotepa, cisplatin, paclitaxel,1 tamoxifen, vincristine Alpha interferon, bleomycin, etoposide doxorubicin Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, etoposide, cisplatin Melphalan, ifosfamide, autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
1Investigational agent. Treatment is available through qualified investigators and centers authorized
by the National Cancer institute and Cooperative Oncology Groups.
2Supportive agent; not oncolytic.
3These tumors are generally managed initially with surgery with or without radiation therapy
with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. For metastatic disease, the role of palliative radiation
therapy is as important as that of chemotherapy.
Table 4–4 sets forth the currently used dosage schedules and toxicities of the most commonly used cancer chemotherapeutic agents.
The dosage schedules given are for single-agent therapy. Combination therapy is used for many diseases, including advanced-stage
Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and testicular carcinoma. Hematologic or other toxicity may limit the therapeutic
effectiveness of chemotherapy. It is possible to avoid the need for dose reductions or delay in therapy by using granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; sargramostim).
Scroll right to see more columns.
Table 4–4. Single agent dosage and toxicity of anticancer drugs.
Drug Alkylating agents Dosage Acute Toxicity Delayed Toxicity
Mechlorethamine 6–10 mg/m2 IV every 3 Severe vesicant; severe Moderate suppression of blood counts.
weeks nausea and vomiting Melphalan effect may be delayed 4–6 weeks.
Excessive doses produce severe bone
marrow suppression with leukopenia,
Chlorambucil 0.1–0.2 mg/kg/d orally None thrombocytopenia, and bleeding.
(6–12 mg/d) or 0.4 Alopecia and hemorrhagic cystitis occur with
mg/kg pulse every 4 cyclophosphamide, while busulfan can cause
weeks hyperpigmentation, pulmonary fibrosis, and
weakness (see text). Ifosfamide
Cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2/d orally for Nausea and vomiting with is always given with mesna to prevent
14 days; 400 mg/m2 higher doses cystitis. Acute leukemia may develop
orally for 5 days; 1–1.5 in 5–10% of patients receiving prolonged
g/m2 IV every 3–4 weeks therapy with melphalan, mechlorethamine, or
chlorambucil; all alkylators probably increase
the risk of secondary malignancies with
prolonged use. Most cause either
Melphalan 0.25 mg/kg/d orally for 4 None temporary or permanent aspermia/
days every 6 weeks amenorrhea.
Busulfan 2–8 mg/d orally; None
150–250 mg/course
Carmustine (BCNU) 200 mg/m2 IV every 6 Local irritant Prolonged leukopenia and thrombocytopenia .
weeks Rarely hepatitis. Acute leukemia has been
observed to occur in some patients
Lomustine (CCNU) 100–130 mg orally Nausea and vomiting receiving nitrosoureas. Nitrosoureas can
every 6–8 weeks cause delayed pulmonary fibrosis with
prolonged use.
Procarbazine 100 mg/m2/d orally for Nausea and vomiting Bone marrow suppression, mental
14 days every 4 weeks suppression, MAO inhibition, disulfiram-like
effect
Dacarbazine 250 mg/m2/d IV for 5 Severe nausea and Bone marrow suppression; flu-like syndrome
days every 3 weeks; vomiting; anorexia
1500 mg/m2 IV as
single dose
Cisplatin 50–100 mg/m2 IV every Severe nausea and vomiting
3 weeks; 20 mg/m2 IV
for 5 days every 4 weeks
Carboplatin 360 mg/m2 IV every 4 Severe nausea and vomiting
weeks
Structural analogs or antimetabolites
Methotrexate 2.5–5 mg/d orally; None
20–25 mg IM twice
weekly; high-dose:
500–1000 mg/m2 IV
every 2–3 weeks;
12–15 mg intrathecally
every week for 4–6
doses
Mercaptopurine 2.5 mg/kg/d orally; 100 None
mg/m2/d orally for 5
days for induction
Thioguanine 2 mg/kg/d orally; 100 Mild nausea, diarrhea
mg/m2/d IV for 7 days
for induction
Fluorouracil 15 mg/kg/d IV for 3–5 None
days every 3 weeks; 15
mg/kg weekly as
tolerated; 500–1000
mg/m2 IV every 4 weeks
Cytarabine 100–200 mg/m2/d for High-dose: nausea,
5–10 days by vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia
continuous IV infusion;
2–3 g/m2 IV every 12
hours for 3–7 days; 20
mg/m2 SC daily in
divided doses
Hormonal agents
Testosterone 100 mg IM 3 times None
propionate weekly
Fluoxymesterone 20–40 mg/d orally None
Flutamide 250 mg 3 times a day None
orally
Diethylstilbestrol 1–5 mg/d orally in Occasional nausea and
divided doses vomiting
Ethinyl estradiol 3 mg/d orally None
Tamoxifen 20 mg/d orally in 2 Transient flare of bone pain
divided doses
Megestrol acetate 40 mg orally 4 times daily None
Anastrazole 1 mg orally daily None
Hydroxyproges1 g IM twice weekly None
terone caproate
Medroxyproges100–200 mg/d orally; None
terone 200–600 mg orally twice
weekly
Adrenocorticosteroid
Prednisone 20–100 mg/d orally or Alteration in mood
50–100 mg every other
day orally with systemic
chemotherapy
Aromatase inhibitor
Aminoglutethimide 500 mg/d orally, along Initial drowsiness
with hydrocortisone, 40
mg/d orally
GnRH analogs
Leuprolide 7.5 mg IM (depot) once Local irritation, transient
a month; 1 mg/d SC flare of symptoms
Goserelin acetate 3.6 mg SC monthly Transient flare of symptoms
Biologic response modifiers
Interferon alfa-2a 3–5 million units Fever, chills, fatigue,
Interferon alfa-2b SC 3 times weekly or anorexia
daily
Aldesleukin (IL-2) 600,000 IU/kg IV over Hypotension, fever, chills,
15 minutes every 8 rigors, diarrhea, nausea,
hours for 14 doses, vomiting, pruritus, liver,
repeated after 9-day kidney, and CNS toxicity,
rest period. Some capillary leak (primarily at
doses may be withheld high doses), pruritic skin
or interrupted because rash, infections (can be
of toxicity. Caution: severe)
High doses must be
administered in an ICU
setting by experienced
Nephrotoxicity, mild otic and bone marrow
toxicity, neurotoxicity.
Bone marrow suppression, prolonged
anemia; same as cisplatin but milder.
Bone marrow suppression, oral and
gastrointestinal ulceration, acute renal failure;
hepatotoxicity, rash, increased toxicity when
effusions are present. Note: Citrovorum
factor (leucovorin) rescue for doses over 100
mg/m2.
Well tolerated. Larger doses cause bone
marrow suppression
Well tolerated. Larger doses cause bone
marrow suppression
Nausea, diarrhea, oral and gastrointestinal
ulceration, bone marrow suppression,
dacryocystitis.
Nausea and vomiting; cystitis; severe bone
marrow suppression; megaloblastosis; CNS
toxicity with high-dose cytarabine.
Fluid retention, masculinization, leg cramps.
Cholestatic jaundice in some patients
receiving fluoxymesterone.
Gynecomastia, hot flushes, decreased libido,
mild gastrointestinal side effects.
Fluid retention, feminization, uterine bleeding,
exacerbation of cardiovascular disease,
painful gynecomastia,
thromboembolic disease.
?Increased risk of venous thrombosis;
anovulation
Occasional fluid retention; rare thrombosis,
weight gain.
Fluid retention, hypertension, diabetes,
increased susceptibility to infection, "moon
facies," osteoporosis, electrolyte
abnormalities, gastritis.
Transient skin rash, which usually subsides
with continued therapy; weight gain, fluid
retention, leg cramps; cholestatic jaundice.
Hot flushes, decreased libido, impotence,
gynecomastia, mild gastrointestinal side effects
.
General malaise, weight loss, confusion
Hypoglycemia, anemia
personnel.
Peptide hormone inhibitor
Octreotide acetate 100–600 mg/d SC in 2 Local irritant; nausea and Diarrhea, abdominal pain, hypoglycemia.
divided doses vomiting
Natural products and miscellaneous agents
Vinblastine 0.1–0.2 mg/kg or 6 Mild nausea and vomiting; Alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, bone
mg/m2 IV weekly severe vesicant marrow suppression, constipation, SIADH,
areflexia.
Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (maximum: 2 Severe vesicant Areflexia, muscle weakness, peripheral
mg weekly) neuropathy, paralytic ileus, alopecia (see
text), SIADH.
Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 IV weekly Mild nausea and vomiting, Granulocytopenia, constipation, peripheral
fatigue, severe vesicant neuropathy, alopecia
Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by Hypersensitivity reaction Peripheral neuropathy, bone marrow
continuous infusion over (premedicate with suppression, fluid retention.
24 hours every 3 weeks diphenhydramine and
dexamethasone), mild
Docetaxel 60–100 mg/m2 IV every nausea and vomiting
3 weeks
Dactinomycin 0.04 mg/kg IV weekly Nausea and vomiting; Alopecia, stomatitis, diarrhea, bone marrow
severe vesicant suppression.
Daunorubicin 30–60 mg/m2 daily IV Nausea, fever, red urine Alopecia, stomatitis, bone marrow
for 3 days, or 30–60 (not hematuria); severe suppression, late cardiotoxicity. Risk of
mg/m2 IV weekly vesicant; acute cardiotoxicity cardiotoxicity increases with radiation,
cyclophosphamide.
Idarubicin 12 mg/m2 daily IV for 3
days
Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV every 3
weeks to a maximum
total dose of 550 mg/m2
Liposomal 20 mg/m2 IV every 3
Doxorubicin weeks
Daunorubicin 40 mg/m2 IV every 2
weeks
Etoposide 100 mg/m2/d IV for 5 Nausea and vomiting; Alopecia, bone marrow suppression.
days or 50–150 mg/d occasionally hypotension
orally
Plicamycin 25–50 mg/kg IV every Nausea and vomiting Thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, hepatotoxicity,
(mithramycin) other day for up to 8 nephrotoxicity, stomatitis.
doses
Mitomycin 10–20 mg/m2 every 6–8 Severe vesicant; nausea Prolonged bone marrow suppression, rare
weeks hemolytic-uremic syndrome.
Mitoxantrone 12–15 mg/m2/d IV for 3 Mild nausea and vomiting Alopecia, mild mucositis, bone marrow
days with cytarabine; suppression.
8–12 mg/m2 IV every 3
weeks
Bleomycin Up to 15 units/m2 IM, Allergic reactions, fever, Fever, dermatitis, pulmonary fibrosis.
IV, or SC twice weekly hypotension
to a total dose of 200
units/m2
Hydroxyurea 500–1500 mg/d orally Mild nausea and vomiting Hyperpigmentation, bone marrow
suppression.
Mitotane 6–12 g/d orally Nausea and vomiting Dermatitis, diarrhea, mental suppression,
muscle tremors.
Fludarabine 25 mg/m2/d IV for 5 Nausea and vomiting Bone marrow suppression, diarrhea, mild
days every 4 weeks hepatotoxicity, immune suppression.
Cladribine (CdA) 0.09 mg/kg/d by Mild nausea, rash, fatigue Bone marrow suppression, fever, immune
continuous IV infusion suppression.
for 7 days
Topotecan 1.5 mg/kg IV daily for 5 Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, Alopecia, bone marrow suppression.
days every 3 weeks headache, dyspnea
Tretinoin 45 g/m2 by mouth until Retinoic acid syndrome (fever, dyspnea, pleural or pericardial effusion)
remission or for 90 days must be treated emergently with dexamethasone; headache, dry skin rash,
flushing.
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 every week Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, Bone marrow suppression, rash, fluid
up to 7 weeks, then 1 fever, dyspnea retention, mouth sores, flu-like symptoms,
week off, then weekly paresthesias.
for 3 out of 4 weeks
Supportive agents
Allopurinol 300–900 mg/d orally for None Rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome; enhances
prevention or relief of effects and toxicity of mercaptopurine when
hyperuricemia used in combination.
Mesna 20% of ifosfamide Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea None
dosage at the time of
ifosfamide
administration, then 4
and 8 hours after each
dose of chemotherapy
to prevent hemorrhagic
cystitis
Leucovorin 10 mg/m2 every 6 hours None Enhances toxic effects of fluorouracil.
IV or orally until serum
methotrexate levels are
below 5 ´ 10–8 mol/L
with hydration and
urinary alkalinization
(about 72 hours)
Amifostine 910 mg/m2 IV daily, 30 Hypotension, nausea, Decrease in serum calcium.
minutes prior to vomiting, flushing
chemotherapy
Dexrazoxane 10:1 ratio of Pain on injection Increased bone marrow suppression.
anthracycline IV, before
(within 30 minutes of)
chemotherapy infusion
Pilocarpine 5–10 mg orally 3 times Sweating, headache, flushing; nausea, chills, rhinitis, dizziness, and
hydrochloride daily urinary frequency at high dosage
Pamidronate 90 mg IV every month Symptomatic hypoglycemia None
(rare), flare of bone pain,
local irritation
Epoetin alfa 100–300 units/kg IV or Skin irritation or pain at Hypertension, headache, seizures in
(erythropoietin) SC 3 times a week injection site patients on dialysis (rare).
Filgrastim (G-CSF) 5 mg/kg/d SC or IV Mild to moderate bone pain, ?Unknown risk of tumor cell stimulation.
mild hypotension (rare),
irritation at injection sites
(rare)
Sargramostim 250 mg/kg/d as a 2-hour Fluid retention, dyspnea,
(GM-CSF) IV infusion (can be capillary leak (rare),
given SC) supraventricular tachycardia
(rare), mild to moderate
bone pain, irritation at
injection sites
Hormonal therapy also plays an important role in cancer management. Hormonal therapy or ablation is important in treatment and palliation of breast and prostatic carcinoma, while added progestins are useful in suppression of endometrial carcinoma. Women with metastatic breast cancer who show objective improvement with hormonal therapy have tumors that contain cytoplasmic estrogen and progesterone receptors. Antiestrogens (eg, tamoxifen) and aromatase inhibitors (eg, anastrazole or megestrol acetate) that block peripheral conversion of adrenal androgens into estrogens have substantial additive effects to—or may obviate the need for—oophorectomy in premenopausal women whose tumors are estrogen- or progesterone receptor-positive. Hormonal approaches are also available to treat prostate cancer, though androgen receptors remain difficult to measure. These include the use of estrogen therapy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (eg, leuprolide), aromatase inhibitors (eg, aminoglutethimide), and antiandrogens (eg, flutamide). The use of leuprolide plus flutamide can be considered as an alternative to orchiectomy but also causes impotence. High-dose ketoconazole has been used to rapidly suppress adrenal production of steroids in crises such as cord compression. Use of this agent requires hydrocortisone supplementation. Several recombinant growth factors have been shown to be effective in the treatment of malignancy. Recombinant alpha interferon has marked antitumor effects in hairy cell leukemia and chronic myelogenous leukemia, moderate effects in lymphomas, in the epidemic (AIDS-associated) form of Kaposi's sarcoma, in multiple myeloma, and as adjuvant therapy for malignant melanoma. Alpha interferon has some utility also in metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and carcinoid syndrome. Patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia may benefit from treatment with alpha interferon and achieve both a hematologic and cytogenetic remission. Patients with a cytogenetic response to interferon (about 30% of treated patients) have longer survival than patients treated with standard oral chemotherapy. The addition of alpha interferon to systemic chemotherapy for multiple myeloma appears to enhance the degree of cytoreduction achieved as compared with chemotherapy alone; toxicity is additive. Use of alpha interferon for myeloma following chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow transplant has prolonged remission duration, though overall survival may not be altered. Another cytokine, interleukin-2, when administered alone or in combination with lymphocyte-activated killer cells or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, exhibits marked antitumor activity in a minority of patients with melanoma or renal cancer, though its use is associated with marked toxicity. In addition to cytokines, other agents have recently been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of some tumors. For chronic lymphocytic leukemia and low-grade lymphomas, fludarabine phosphate, cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine; CdA), and pentostatin (2-deoxycoformycin) are effective. Studies using cladribine to treat hairy cell leukemia have resulted in a high remission rate that is durable with tolerable toxicities after a 1-week course of therapy. Pentostatin has been approved for use in hairy cell leukemia. Paclitaxel is a novel agent isolated from the Pacific yew tree that has been found to be effective in reducing tumor size in 20–35% of patients with refractory metastatic ovarian cancer, though most patients experienced rapid disease progression after an initial response; paclitaxel combined with carboplatin appears to be more effective than cyclophosphamide plus carboplatin in the adjuvant setting. Dose intensification as well as intraperitoneal instillation may also be helpful. The toxicity of paclitaxel is primarily hematologic and neurologic. The hematologic toxicity is dose-dependent and can be ameliorated by the use of myeloid growth factors. Effectiveness has been demonstrated in metastatic carcinoma of the breast as well as in other cancers. Docetaxel, a synthetic analog of paclitaxel, has recently been approved and is effective also in the treatment of advanced malignancies, especially breast cancer. Toxicities are similar to those of paclitaxel. Vinorelbine, a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, has recently been approved for use in treating advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Response rates of 30% have been observed when vinorelbine is used as a single agent in this poorly responsive tumor. Current studies are evaluating combination chemotherapy, including vinorelbine, in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and other tumors. Newer experimental cancer therapies are discussed briefly at the end of this chapter.
10040:7:1 Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP: Chorionic tumors. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1740. (Review of the clinical presentation and treatment of this curable tumor.)
10040:7:2 Chabner BA: Biological basis for cancer treatment. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:633. (A discussion of cancer biology as the basis of drug discovery research and a review of novel cancer therapies.)
10040:7:3 O'Brien S, del Giglio A, Keating M: Advances in the biology and treatment of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1995;85:307. (Fludarabine treatment results in high complete remission rates and may allow more aggressive subsequent therapy.)
10040:7:4 Philip T et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1540. (Bone marrow transplantation for chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed lymphoma markedly improves event-free survival over standard salvage chemotherapy [46% versus 12% at 5 years].)
10040:7:5 Pritchard RS, Anthony SP: Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced, unresectable, non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:723. (Fourteen articles with 2589 patients suggested a 2-month mean gain in life expectancy when chemotherapy was added to radiation therapy.)
10040:7:6 Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC: Paclitaxel (Taxol). N Engl J Med 1995;332:1004. (A thorough review, including mechanisms of action, toxicity, and antitumor effects.)
10040:7:7 Saven A, Piro LD: Treatment of hairy cell leukemia. Blood 1992;79:1111. (Current and investigational treatments of hairy cell leukemia, including interferon, deoxycoformycin, and cladribine.)
10040:7:8 Yuen A, Sikic BI: Multidrug resistance in lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2453. (Review of multidrug resistance in lymphomas and status of ongoing trials using modulating agents.)
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Micrometastases
One of the most important roles of cancer chemotherapy is as adjuvant therapy to eradicate or suppress minimal residual disease after primary field treatment with surgery or irradiation. Failure of primary field therapy to eradicate tumor is due principally to occult micrometastases of tumor stem cells outside the primary field. These distant micrometastases are more likely to be present in patients with positive lymph nodes at the time of surgery (eg, breast cancer), in patients with tumors known to have a propensity for early hematogenous spread (eg, osteogenic sarcoma, Wilms' tumor), and in patients with certain pathologic or molecular risk factors (eg, high proliferative index, vascular invasion, oncogene amplification). Given specific risk factors, the risk of recurrent or metastatic disease can be extremely high (> 80%). Only systemic therapy can adequately prevent micrometastases. Chemotherapeutic regimens that have been shown to be effective in inducing regression of advanced cancers may be curative when combined with surgery for high-risk "early" cancer. More data are now available to support the use of adjuvant therapy in several neoplasms. Prolongation of survival times has been shown for women (especially premenopausal women) with breast cancer and positive or negative axillary lymph nodes (stages I, II, and III) from combination chemotherapy following surgical resection; there are several useful regimens. Node-negative patients are treated with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) or variants, whereas high-risk, node-positive patients are generally treated with regimens that include doxorubicin. Neoadjuvant (preoperative) and perioperative chemotherapy are also used and may improve surgical resectability or time to disease progression. The antiestrogen tamoxifen is used routinely either with or without antecedent chemotherapy if receptors for estrogen and progesterone are present. The role of amplification of the c-erbB-2 or Her-2/neu oncogene in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer is a subject of current research. In postmenopausal women, tamoxifen alone may be used. The main challenge in treating women with node-negative (stage I) breast cancer is to identify prognostic factors to determine which patients are at higher risk and therefore more likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus levamisole is now indicated in Dukes C (node-positive) colon cancer and has been shown to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. Earlier clinical trials employing semustine (methyl-CCNU) appeared to result in an increased risk of both leukemia and renal insufficiency. The omission of semustine from combination regimens still results in enhanced cure rates with decreased local and overall tumor recurrence. Other tumors that have been shown to respond to adjuvant therapy include osteogenic sarcoma, ovarian cancer, and malignant melanoma. Adjuvant therapy remains investigational and unproved for a number of common tumors, including non-small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer. Patients with Hodgkin's disease or testicular carcinoma do not benefit from adjuvant therapy. Although adjuvant therapy has been shown to reduce the rate of recurrence for some cancers, there is still a high failure rate (up to 80% in high-risk breast cancer despite adjuvant therapy). In most cases, tumor recurrence signifies incurability. There is clear evidence of a dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in some cancers; however, doses have been limited by bone marrow toxicity. Current studies are investigating the use of dose-intense chemotherapy regimens with or without autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue in the high-risk adjuvant setting for patients with carcinoma of the breast, testis, and ovaries. Otherwise incurable patients with testicular cancer have been cured by this intensive treatment approach. Nonrandomized studies suggest efficacy with tolerable side effects of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support in the setting of high-risk breast cancer (more than ten positive lymph nodes). Multicenter trials are now in progress comparing aggressive adjuvant chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for high-risk breast cancer. The use of marrow transplantation for high-risk ovarian cancer remains controversial, though long-lived responses in otherwise incurable patients have been documented. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer at high risk for recurrence may now be considered for treatment in a multicenter randomized study comparing transplantation with standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Young patients with high-risk malignancies should be considered for entry into clinical trials investigating this aggressive, potentially curable therapy. 10040:8:1 [Physicians' Data query: Information on cancer treatment] http://cancernet.nci.nih.gov/h_treat.htm
10040:8:2 Bonadonna G et al: Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: The results of 20 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med 1995;332:901. (Long-term improvement in survival in patients with node-positive breast cancer randomized to receive adjuvant chemotherapy following mastectomy.)
10040:8:3 Cannistra SA: Cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1550. (A review of risk factors, presentation, staging, surgical treatment and chemotherapy, and prognosis.)
10040:8:4 Gradishar WJ, Tallman MF, Abrams JS: High-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:599. (A review of this controversial but widely used therapy.)
10040:8:5 Moertel CG: Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1136.
10040:8:6 Trimble EL et al: Neoadjuvant therapy in cancer treatment. Cancer 1993;72:3515. (Increasing indications.)
Toxicity and Dose Modification of Chemotherapeutic Agents
A number of cancer chemotherapeutic agents have cytotoxic effects on rapidly proliferating normal cells in bone marrow, mucosa, and skin. Still other drugs such as the vinca alkaloids produce neuropathy, and hormones often have psychologic effects. Acute and chronic toxicities of the various drugs are summarized in Table 4–4. Appropriate dose modification usually minimizes these side effects, so that therapy can be continued with relative safety.
Bone Marrow Toxicity
Depression of bone marrow is usually the most serious limiting toxicity of cancer chemotherapy. Autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation or rescue can reduce the myelosuppressive toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy; however, cost and toxicity limit its general use. Growth factors that stimulate myeloid proliferation (eg, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF; filgrastim] and granulocyte-macrophage stimulating factor [GM-CSF]; sargramostim) or erythroid proliferation (erythropoietin [epoetin alfa]) are now used to ameliorate bone marrow toxicity. G-CSF and GM-CSF have been shown to shorten the period of neutropenia following both standard and high-dose chemotherapy. Mucosal toxicity is also reduced. The myeloid growth factors are also used to stimulate circulation of progenitor cells in the peripheral blood either at steady state or during white blood cell recovery following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. These cells are then harvested using an apheresis machine and frozen for later use. When stimulated peripheral blood progenitor cells are used instead of or in conjunction with bone marrow for autologous transplantation following high-dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy, recovery of both neutrophils and platelets may be hastened by as much as 7–10 days as opposed to the use of bone marrow alone. Epoetin alfa (erythropoietin) has been shown to improve anemia associated with malignancy. Patients must have adequate iron stores to respond to this agent, and even patients with marrow infiltration with tumor may benefit. Higher doses are necessary for patients with cancer than for patients with renal failure (100–150 units/kg compared with 50 units/kg). It is useful to check the level of erythropoietin before instituting therapy. Very high levels (> 500 ng/mL) predict a poor response. Erythropoietin is usually given by subcutaneous injection three times a week. Thrombocytopenia remains a problem with high doses of or prolonged exposure to chemotherapeutic agents and may limit therapy. Several agents may help with this problem. Interleukin-3 stimulates myeloid growth and, to a lesser extent, platelet recovery. The megakaryocyte growth factor thrombopoietin has been cloned and is the subject of intense study. Clinical trials using thrombopoietin in a variety of circumstances are under way. Commonly used short-acting drugs that affect the bone marrow are the alkylating agents (eg, cyclophosphamide, melphalan, chlorambucil), procarbazine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, vinblastine, fluorouracil, dactinomycin, and doxorubicin. In general, it is preferable to use alkylating agents in intensive "pulse" courses every 3–4 weeks rather than to administer the drugs in continuous daily schedules. This allows for complete hematologic (and immunologic) recovery between courses rather than continuously suppressing the bone marrow with a cytotoxic agent. Pulse therapy reduces side effects to some degree but does not reduce therapeutic efficacy. The standard dosage schedules required to produce tumor responses with these agents often induce bone marrow depression. Continuing some drugs in the face of falling blood counts may result in severe bone marrow aplasia with pancytopenia, bleeding, or infection. Simple guidelines for treatment and follow-up can usually prevent severe marrow depression. With long-term chemotherapy, counts should be obtained initially at weekly intervals; the frequency of counts may be reduced only after the patient's sensitivity to the drug can be well predicted (eg, 3–4 months) and cumulative toxicity excluded. In patients with normal blood counts as well as normal liver and kidney function, drugs should be started in full dosages. Bone marrow toxicity is cumulative over time, and this must be anticipated during follow-up. Patients with bone marrow involvement may tolerate chemotherapy poorly initially, with improved counts on future cycles as the tumor burden is reduced. Drug dosage can usually be modified as a function of the peripheral white blood count or platelet count (or both). These modifications assume that the blood counts are checked shortly before the next course of chemotherapy is to be administered. Dosage modifications are used primarily for repeated courses of oral alkylator or antimetabolite therapy but should be avoided when possible if treatment is given with curative intent. A scheme for dosage modification is presented in Table 4–5. Alternatively, the interval between drug courses can be lengthened, thereby permitting more complete hematologic recovery and repetition of full-dose chemotherapy. Both dosage modification and delay of chemotherapy limit the efficacy of treatment.
Table 4–5. A common scheme for dose modification of cancer chemotherapeutic agents.1
Granulocyte Suggested Drug
Count Platelet Count (/mL) Dosage (% of full dose)
> 2000/µL > 100,000/µL 100%
1000–2000/µL 75,000–100,000/µL 50%
< 1000/µL < 50,000/µL 0% 1In general, dose modification should be avoided if full recovery is expected within 1–2 weeks. Chemotherapy can be delayed and given after recovery at full dosage to maintain therapeutic efficacy.
10040:9:1 ASCO Ad Hoc Colony-Stimulating Factor Guideline Expert Panel: American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2471. (Standard practice guidelines.)
10040:9:2 Kaushansky K: Thrombopoietin: The primary regulator of megakaryocyte and platelet production. Thromb Haemost 1995;74:521. (A review of current preclinical data.)
10040:9:3 Vose JM, Armitage JO: Clinical applications of hematopoietic growth factors. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1023.
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea & Vomiting
A number of cytotoxic anticancer drugs induce nausea and vomiting. In general, these symptoms are thought to originate in the central nervous system rather than peripherally. Parenteral administration of agents such as doxorubicin, etoposide, or cyclophosphamide frequently is associated with mild to moderate nausea and vomiting, whereas nitrosoureas, dacarbazine, and particularly cisplatin usually cause severe symptoms. Combination chemotherapy can also cause severe symptoms. Antiemetics clearly reduce and often eliminate nausea and vomiting associated with these drugs and are especially useful in conjunction with cisplatin. Metoclopramide is a particularly useful agent, especially when administered parenterally at a dosage of 1–2 mg/kg both 30 minutes before and again 30 minutes after the administration of chemotherapy. Extrapyramidal signs may be induced with this drug but frequently can be suppressed with 25–50 mg of oral or parenteral diphenhydramine. Dexamethasone has antiemetic effects when administered at a dosage of 6–10 mg either as a single dose prior to or both prior to and every 6 hours following the administration of chemotherapy for two to four total doses. Both of these drugs are more potent than conventional agents such as prochlorperazine, diphenhydramine, and thiethylperazine. Prochlorperazine is given at a dose of 10 mg orally or intravenously every 6 hours. The total dose given over 24 hours should not exceed 40 mg. A 25 mg rectal suppository is available and may be useful for patients who are too nauseated to swallow pills without experiencing further emesis. Unfortunately, all phenothiazines can induce extrapyramidal side effects. Thiethylperazine is given at a dose of 10 mg every 8 hours by mouth and is also available at the same dose in a rectal suppository. Lorazepam has both antiemetic and sedating effects and is administered at a dose of 0.5–1 mg every 4–6 hours by the sublingual route, making it particularly useful in the outpatient setting. Older patients may have intolerable psychologic side effects. Combinations of antiemetics (eg, metoclopramide with dexamethasone and lorazepam) are often more effective than maximal doses of any one agent for blocking cisplatin-induced vomiting. 5-Hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (ondansetron, granisetron) have now replaced high-dose metoclopramide in the treatment and prevention of emesis. A new and very potent class of antiemetics, these drugs are serotonin receptor-blocking agents that have few side effects. They are both more effective and less toxic than metoclopramide in cisplatin-treated patients. They are also effective against radiation-induced and postanesthetic vomiting as well as for patients with refractory nausea and vomiting following administration of other chemotherapeutic agents. Ondansetron is administered by the parenteral route at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg for three doses or orally at a dose of 8 mg every 8 hours. The first dose is given 30 minutes before the start of chemotherapy; subsequent doses are given 4 and 8 hours after the first dose. A typical antiemetic regimen might include ondansetron combined with 0.5–1 mg of lorazepam (sublingual) or 10 mg of prochlorperazine orally or intravenously and dexamethasone (10 mg orally), omitting both metoclopramide and diphenhydramine. For less emetogenic regimens, ondansetron alone may be no more effective than metoclopramide and dexamethasone and is usually used only for failure to control nausea with less expensive combination regimens. Granisetron is a long-acting serotonin receptor antagonist that is given as a single dose of 10 mg/kg intravenously 30 minutes before chemotherapy or orally at a dosage of 1–2 mg/d. The half-life of granisetron is 9 hours, and 24-hour dosing is recommended by the manufacturer. Ondansetron may also be effective in a single daily parenteral dose of 32 mg. Both agents appear to be more effective when given in conjunction with dexamethasone. Dronabinol (D9-tetrahydrocannabinol) is effective in some patients at a dose of 5 mg/m2 prior to and then every 2–4 hours following chemotherapy for a total of four to six doses a day. Dronabinol may cause undesirable side effects such as dysphoria, and it is available only for oral administration. A patient receiving antiemetics (eg, lorazepam, prochlorperazine, metoclopramide) along with chemotherapy on an outpatient basis must be escorted to and from the clinic, since the antiemetics often induce marked sedation and transient impairment of balance and reflexes. Antiemetics are more effective when given prophylactically. Therefore, regular dosing of an agent such as lorazepam or prochlorperazine is recommended after chemotherapy until the emetogenic effects have dissipated. This is dependent on the patient as well as on the type of chemotherapy administered. One problem with all combinations of antiemetic agents is the development of tachyphylaxis over 4–5 days with continuing highly emetogenic chemotherapy. This limits the effectiveness of any regimen.
10040:10:1 Grunberg SM et al: Control of chemotherapy-induced emesis. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1790. (Mechanisms and treatment.)
10040:10:2 Perez EA: Review of the preclinical pharmacology and comparative efficacy of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists for chemotherapy-induced emesis. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1036. (This is a highly effective class of antiemetic agents, and all three studied appear to be relatively equivalent.)
Gastrointestinal & Skin Toxicity
Since antimetabolites such as methotrexate and fluorouracil act only on rapidly proliferating cells, they damage the cells of mucosal surfaces such as the gastrointestinal tract. Methotrexate has similar effects on the skin. These toxicities are at times more serious than bone marrow suppression, and they should be looked for routinely when these agents are used. Erythema of the buccal mucosa is an early sign of mucosal toxicity. If therapy is continued beyond this point, oral ulceration will develop. In general, it is wise to discontinue therapy at the time of appearance of early oral ulceration. This finding usually heralds the appearance of similar but potentially more serious ulceration at other sites lower in the gastrointestinal tract. Therapy can usually be reinstituted when the oral ulcer heals (7–10 days). The dose of drug used may need to be modified downward at this point, with titration to an acceptable level of mucosal toxicity. Adequate mouth care with antimicrobial mouthwashes and attention to dental hygiene are essential and may prevent severe toxicity. Common mouthwashes include the microbicidal oral rinse chlorhexidine and a mixture of salt and bicarbonate of soda in warm water, which aids in debridement of dead mucosa. A prophylactic antifungal mouthwash such as nystatin oral suspension may also be used. High doses of methotrexate require special consideration as noted in the following section. Radiation therapy may cause xerostomia, which can lead to difficulty in swallowing, discomfort, and gum disease. Pilocarpine hydrochloride, 5–10 mg orally three times a day, can relieve symptoms of dry mouth but must be used regularly.
Miscellaneous Drug-Specific Toxicities
The toxicities of individual drugs have been summarized in Table 4–4. Several of these warrant additional mention, since they occur with commonly administered agents, and special preventive measures are often indicated.
A. Hemorrhagic Cystitis Induced by Cyclophosphamide or Ifosfamide: Metabolic products of cyclophosphamide that retain cytotoxic activity are excreted into the urine. Some patients appear to metabolize more of the drug to these active excretory products. If their urine is concentrated, the toxic metabolite may cause severe bladder damage. Patients receiving cyclophosphamide must be advised to maintain a high fluid intake. Early symptoms of bladder toxicity include dysuria and frequency despite the absence of bacteriuria. Such symptoms develop in about 20% of patients who receive the drug chronically. If microscopic hematuria develops, it is advisable to stop the drug temporarily or switch to a different alkylating agent, increase fluid intake, and administer a urinary analgesic such as phenazopyridine. With severe cystitis, large segments of bladder mucosa may be shed and the patient may have prolonged gross hematuria. Such patients should be observed for signs of urinary obstruction and may require cystoscopy for removal of obstructing blood clots. The risk of developing hemorrhagic cystitis is dose-related. For high doses of cyclophosphamide, preventive continuous bladder irrigation with 0.9% saline solution is used during the period of drug administration and for the following 24 hours. The cyclophosphamide analog ifosfamide can cause severe hemorrhagic cystitis when used alone. However, when it is used in conjunction with a series of doses of the neutralizing agent mesna, bladder toxicity can be prevented. Mesna can also be used to prevent cystitis in patients receiving cyclophosphamide in high doses.
B. Vincristine-Induced Neuropathy: Neuropathy is a toxic side effect that is peculiar to the vinca alkaloid drugs, especially vincristine. The peripheral neuropathy can be sensory, motor, autonomic, or a combination of these effects. In its mildest form, it consists of paresthesias of the fingers and toes. Occasional patients develop acute jaw or throat pain after vincristine therapy. This may be a form of trigeminal or glossopharyngeal neuralgia. With continued vincristine therapy, the paresthesias may extend to the proximal interphalangeal joints, hyporeflexia can appear in the lower extremities, and weakness may develop in the quadriceps muscle group. At this point, it is wise to discontinue vincristine therapy until the neuropathy has subsided. A useful means of judging whether peripheral motor neuropathy is severe enough to warrant stopping treatment is to have the patient attempt to do deep knee bends or rise from a chair without using the arm muscles. Constipation is the most common symptom of autonomic neuropathy associated with vincristine therapy. Patients receiving vincristine should be started on stool softeners and mild cathartics when therapy is begun; otherwise, severe impaction may result along with an atonic bowel. More serious autonomic involvement can lead to acute intestinal ileus with signs indistinguishable from those of an acute abdomen. Bladder neuropathies are uncommon but may be severe. These two complications are absolute contraindications to continued vincristine therapy. The majority of symptoms from vincristine are mild and resolve slowly after therapy has been completed. Paclitaxel, cisplatin, carboplatin, and vinorelbine can also cause peripheral neuropathy, though as a rule symptoms improve gradually after treatment is stopped.
C. Methotrexate Toxicity and Citrovorum Rescue: In addition to standard uses of methotrexate for cancer chemotherapy, this drug is also used in very high doses that could lead to fatal bone marrow toxicity if given without an antidote. High-dose methotrexate therapy with leucovorin rescue is routinely used to treat osteogenic sarcoma, acute lymphocytic leukemia, and some cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The bone marrow and mucosal toxicity of methotrexate can be prevented by early administration of leucovorin. Serum levels of methotrexate are usually monitored and doses of leucovorin adjusted accordingly. Rescue is required for methotrexate doses over 80 mg/m2 and is usually begun within 4 hours after completing treatment. Up to 100 mg/m2 of leucovorin is given initially every 6 hours, with further doses adjusted for the serum methotrexate level. Rescue is usually continued orally for 3 days or longer until the serum methotrexate level is below 0.05 mmol/L. If an overdose of methotrexate is administered accidentally, leucovorin therapy should be initiated as soon as possible, preferably within 1 hour. Intravenous infusion should be employed for larger overdosages to ensure adequate drug delivery. It is generally advisable to give leucovorin repeatedly in this situation. Vigorous hydration and bicarbonate loading also appear to be important in preventing crystallization of high-dose methotrexate in the renal tubular epithelium. Serum creatinine is determined before beginning therapy and daily thereafter, since methotrexate excretion is slowed by renal insufficiency and toxicity will be enhanced. In high doses, methotrexate can itself cause renal injury. Methotrexate doses are reduced in renal insufficiency. Concomitant use of certain drugs will slow methotrexate excretion, and they are avoided during therapy. These drugs include aspirin, NSAIDs, penicillins, sulfonamides, and probenecid.
D. Busulfan Toxicity: The alkylating agent busulfan, occasionally used for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia, has curious delayed toxicities, including increased skin pigmentation, a wasting syndrome similar to that seen in adrenal insufficiency, and progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Patients who develop either of the latter two problems should be switched to a different drug (eg, melphalan) when further therapy is needed. The pigmentary changes are innocuous and will usually regress slowly after treatment is discontinued. Long-term treatment with busulfan also results in an increased risk of secondary leukemias.
E. Bleomycin Toxicity: This antibiotic has found increasing application in cancer chemotherapy in view of its activity in squamous cell carcinomas, Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, and testicular tumors. Bleomycin can produce edema of the interphalangeal joints and hardening of the palmar and plantar skin. More serious toxicities include an anaphylactic or serum sickness-like reaction and a potentially fatal pulmonary fibrotic reaction (seen especially in elderly patients receiving a total dose of over 300 units). If a nonproductive cough, dyspnea, and pulmonary infiltrates develop, the drug is discontinued, and high-dose corticosteroids are instituted as well as empiric antibiotics pending cultures. Fever alone or with chills is an occasional complication of bleomycin treatment and is not an absolute contraindication to continued treatment. The fever may be avoided by hydrocortisone administration just prior to the injection. Fever alone is not predictive of pulmonary toxicity. About 1% of patients (especially those with lymphoma) may have a severe or even fatal hypotensive reaction after the initial dose of bleomycin. In order to identify and treat such patients, it is wise to administer a test dose of 5 units of bleomycin first and to have adequate monitoring and emergency facilities available. Patients exhibiting a hypotensive reaction should not receive further bleomycin therapy.
F. Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiomyopathy: The anthracycline antibiotics doxorubicin and daunomycin both have acute and delayed cardiac toxicity. The problem is greater with doxorubicin because it has a major role and is used in repeated doses in the treatment of sarcomas, breast cancer, lymphomas, acute leukemia, and certain other solid tumors. Studies of left ventricular function and endomyocardial biopsies indicate that some changes in cardiac dynamics occur in most patients by the time they have received 300 mg/m2 of doxorubicin. The multiple-gated ("MUGA") radionuclide cardiac scan is the most useful noninvasive test for assessing toxicity. Doxorubicin should not be used in elderly patients with intrinsic cardiac disease. In general, patients should not receive a total dose in excess of 550 mg/m2, and 1–10% of patients who receive this dose develop cardiomyopathy. Patients who have had prior chest or mediastinal radiotherapy may develop doxorubicin heart disease at lower total doses. The appearance of a high resting pulse may herald the appearance of cardiac toxicity. Unfortunately, the toxicity may be irreversible and frequently fatal at dosage levels above 550 mg/m2. At lower doses (eg, 350 mg/m2), the symptoms and signs of cardiac failure generally respond well to digitalis, diuretics, and cessation of doxorubicin therapy. Recent evidence suggests that cardiac toxicity can be correlated with high peak plasma levels obtained with intermittent high-dose bolus therapy (eg, every 3–4 weeks). Use of weekly injections or low-dose continuous infusion schedules appears to delay the occurrence of cardiac toxicity. Current laboratory studies suggest that cardiac toxicity may be due to a mechanism involving the formation of intracellular free radicals in cardiac muscle. Pretreatment with dexrazoxane, an iron chelator that decreases free radical formation, appears to protect the myocardium from anthracycline-induced injury but may also reduce the anticancer efficacy of the anthracycline. Dexrazoxane is now approved for the prevention of cardiomyopathy in women with metastatic breast cancer receiving cumulative doxorubicin doses > 300 mg/m2. Liposomally encapsulated doxorubicin and daunorubicin have been FDA-approved and appear to have minimal cardiac toxicity. Their main use to date has been to treat Kaposi's sarcoma. Newer anthracycline analogs include idarubicin, which has shown efficacy against acute nonlymphocytic leukemia and breast cancer when used in combination with other agents. Idarubicin appears to have a similar potential for causing cardiotoxicity when compared with other anthracyclines, though a maximum lifetime dosage recommendation has not yet been made.
G. Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity and Neurotoxicity: Cisplatin is effective in the treatment of testicular, bladder, and ovarian cancer as well as in several other types of tumor. Nausea and vomiting are common, but nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity are more serious. Vigorous hydration with or without mannitol diuresis may substantially reduce nephrotoxicity. Renal function must be carefully monitored during cisplatin therapy, as should serum magnesium, which may fall during therapy with this agent. Ototoxicity is a potentially serious neurotoxicity that can result in deafness. The neurotoxicity of this drug is delayed and is more common after a total dose of 300 mg/m2. Other manifestations include peripheral neuropathy of mixed sensorimotor type that may be associated with painful paresthesias. These supportive measures do not appear to reduce the therapeutic effectiveness of cisplatin. The second-generation platinum analog carboplatin is now available and has been shown to be as effective as cisplatin in ovarian cancer. Carboplatin is less nephrotoxic and causes less severe nausea or vomiting, but it does induce myelosuppression. Amifostine, an organic thiophosphate initially developed as a radioprotective agent, has efficacy in preventing renal toxicity from cisplatin. It has recently been approved to reduce cumulative renal toxicity associated with repeat administration of cisplatin in advanced ovarian cancer. In addition, amifostine may reduce cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced hematologic toxicity and neurotoxicity. Glutathione also appears to be a promising agent in preventing cisplatin neurotoxicity. Glutathione was given at a dose of 1.5 g/m2 intravenously before cisplatin administration, then at a dose of 600 mg by intramuscular injection on days 2–5.
H. Alpha Interferon Toxicities: While alpha interferon is generally tolerated in the standard doses listed in Table 4–4, it has increasing toxicity with increasing doses and is more toxic in elderly patients. Even standard doses may be intolerable to some patients. Fever and chills are initial side effects but are infrequent after continued treatment. These symptoms may be ameliorated or prevented by premedication with acetaminophen and bedtime dosing. However, anorexia, fatigue, and weight loss can be cumulative and with time may become severe. These symptoms may be dose- or treatment-limiting. Thirty percent or more of patients are intolerant of interferon therapy even at low doses. In some patients, central nervous system symptoms develop, usually manifested as confusion or somnolence. Reduction in peripheral blood counts can develop, but this abnormality is usually not clinically important and may even be a desired effect in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. These interferon-induced side effects are sometimes confused with the symptoms of progressive cancer. The side effects usually clear within 1 week after cessation of interferon therapy.
Showing posts with label Anti-fungal Therapy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anti-fungal Therapy. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Antiviral Agents
1
Antiviral Agents
Janet Wong, M.D.
2
Antiviral Agents
Respiratory viruses Herpesviruses HIV
Amantadine Acyclovir Zidovudine
Rimantadine Famciclovir Didanosine
Ribavirin Valacyclovir Zalcitabine
Ganciclovir Stavudine
Foscarnet Lamivudine
Cidofovir Nevirapine
Vidarabine Saquinavir
Trifluridine Indinavir
Ritonavir
Nelfinavir
Delavirdine
3
Amantadine/rimantadine -- Mechanism of
Action
adamantyl case structure interferes with transmembrane proton (H+)
transport initiated by influenza A membrane protein M2
blockage of H+ channel reduces intracellular acidification necessary
for fusion of influenza A to host cell endosomal membranes and
release of rind RNA
influenza B lacks M2 protein; not inhibited by either amantadine or
rimantadine
Amantadine and rimantadine have what is called an adamantyl cage
structure. When the virus is endocytize into the cell, the influenza A
membrane protein M2 is responsible for a transmembrane protein transport
which increases the acidity inside of the cell and allows encoding. Both the
adamantyl cage structure of amantadine and rimantadine interferes with
this transmembrane protein hydrogen ion transport and, therefore, there
can't be encoding of the virus. So, that is how these agents interfere with
the influenza A virus replication. Blockage of the hydrogen ion channel
reduces intracellular acidification which is necessary for fusion of the
influenza A to the host cell endosomal membranes and release of viral
RNA. Influenza B lacks the M2 protein and therefore influenza B is not
inhibited by either amantadine or rimantadine.
4
Amantadine/rimantadine -- Indications
• Prophylaxis of influenza A
• Treatment of influenza A
efficacy greatest if given within 48 hours of onset of symptoms
rimantadine does not have FDA indication for treatment in children
Indications for amantadine and rimantadine. Prophylaxis of influenza A as
well as treatment of influenza A. Now, for treatment of influenza A, efficacy
is greatest if the medications are given within 48 hours from the onset of
symptoms. Rimantadine does not have FDA indication for treatment in
children. However, it is equally efficacious with amantadine. I would have
no problems with using rimantadine in children for treatment if I was going
to use the medication because it is certainly much safer than amantadine.
5
Amantadine/rimantadine -- Adverse Events
. Amantadine - similar to antihistamines
nausea and vomiting
- difficulty concentrating
drowsiness
- nervousness
. Rimantadine - all adverse events are rare
- nausea and vomiting
. Both agents may induce seizures in individuals with prior seizure
disorder
Adverse events. Amantadine. They are very similar to the antihistamines.
They include nausea and vomiting, difficulty concentrating, drowsiness,
nervousness. Sometimes, particularly people who take anticholinergic
drugs in addition will end up with hallucinations and nightmares and a
number of CNS complications. With rimantadine, all adverse events are
rare. The most common ones are nausea and vomiting. But actually as
you'll see in controlled trials the frequency of adverse events of all types
and are pretty much equally distributed between the rimantadine recipients
and the placebo recipients. So, it does seem to be a pretty safe medication.
Both of these medications, however, can induce seizures in individuals who
have prior seizure disorder. In nursing homes this may be a problem, but
it isn't usually a big problem for children. The medication can induce
seizures in an individual with a prior history of seizures.
6
Amantadine/rimantadine -- Resistance
. Epidemic strains are usually sensitive
. Resistance occurs frequently during therapy. Resistance is due to single
amino acid mutation of influenza A M2 protein
. Cross resistance is expected
. Resistant strains may be transmitted
Resistance. In general, epidemic strains are usually sensitive to these two
medications. The new strains that come up are almost always sensitive to
these two medications. However, once you start using these medications,
resistance will develop frequently in the patient during therapy. If they
develop resistant virus or if they don't develop resistant virus, it does not
affect their clinical outcome. The development of resistance on therapy
does not seem to interfere with the beneficial effect of the medication, and
it probably is a later phenomenon that occurs after the immune system has
already had enough time to start working on clearance of virus. However,
the resistant strains can be transmitted. The resistance occurs by a single
amino acid mutation of the influenza A M2 protein. Cross-resistance
between amantadine and rimantadine is to be expected.
7
Amantadine/rimantadine--Indications for Prophylaxis
. Immunization with appropriate influenza vaccine is the prevention
method of choice
. Amantadine/rimantadine indications:
(1) when circulating strain is not in vaccine
(2) to be given simultaneously with vaccine, if vaccine is delayed until
start of influenza A outbreak
(3) during an outbreak in institutions or hospitals which have children at
risk who can't take the vaccine (e.g. anaphylaxis to egg protein; age
<6 months)
The indications for prophylaxis. Immunization with an appropriate influenza
vaccine is the prevention method of choice. This method of choice may not
be adequate when the circulating strain is not in the vaccine you may want
to consider chemoprophylaxis. You may want to give rimantadine or
amantadine simultaneously to the vaccine if the vaccine is delayed until the
influenza A outbreak has occurred. This is particularly relevant if you have
a child who currently now is receiving the vaccine that could lead for the
first set of vaccines two doses four weeks apart. If you delayed it until the
onset of the epidemic, you may need to do it with the amantadine and
rimantadine for actually the entire six weeks because it will take four weeks
to get the vaccines in and it takes about two weeks after the second dose
to have an adequate immune response. So, if the vaccine was delayed, you
can use the chemoprophylaxis.
Another indication for prophylaxis would be during an outbreak in institutions
or hospitals, or in home settings in which the child at risk for influenza
related complications (children who have bronchopulmonary dysplasia or
cystic fibrosis). If you have a child who can't take the vaccine, because they
have anaphylaxis to egg protein or their age is less than six months, you
may want to prophylax the individuals around that person in order to try to
reduce the amount of disease. Another situation where prophylaxis would
be indicated is if you have a child who comes to your office who has
influenza and they happen to have a sibling who is at risk for influenza
related complications. It is better to prophylax the family members so that
you can protect the at-risk child, because in general, most of the time,
influenza is going to be a relatively benign disease for the healthy child and
what you are trying to do is prevent disease in the child at risk.
8
Ribavirin--mechanism of Action
. Unknown; may vary from viral species to viral species
. Synthetic nucleoside analogue of guanosine or xanthosine
. Other possible uses
Influenza A (aerosol)
Influenza B (aerosol)
Measles (intravenous; oral or aerosol)
Hemorrhagic fevers (intravenous)
The mechanism of action for this particular agent is still unknown. It works
kind of like a broad spectrum antiviral agent and it may actually work in
different ways for different viral species. It is a synthetic nucleoside
analogue of guanosine or xanthosine.
9
Ribavirin--indications
. RSV lower respiratory tract infections in selected populations (aerosol)
. Lassa fever (intravenous)
Indications. The major indication is for RSV lower respiratory tract
infections in selected populations and it is given by aerosol. It is also
indicated for Lassa fever given intravenously. Ribavirin is effective against
both influenza A and influenza B, and, in some studies, it looks like it has
clinical efficacy for treatment of influenza A and B. There have been
anecdotal reports of success using intravenous, oral or aerosol ribavirin for
the treatment of measles infection. Most of this is noncontrolled, so true
efficacy and safety is not really clear.
10
Ribavirin--indications for Treatment of RSV
Infection
. Ribavirin may be considered for children with:
complicated congenital heart disease
underlying lung disease, especially bronchopulmonary dysplasia and
cystic fibrosis
prematurity (<37 weeks gestation)
infants <6 weeks of age
children who are immunocompromised
severely ill infants (e.g. high oxygen requirements; mechanical
ventilation)
certain chronic, debilitating conditions
The one area where ribavirin is most commonly considered for use is for
treatment of RSV infections. Right now, ribavirin may be considered for
children with RSV infection in a number of specific problems: complicated
congenital heart disease, particularly those that have high pulmonary artery
pressures; underlying lung disease, especially bronchopulmonary dysplasia
and cystic fibrosis; prematurity with a gestation of less than 37 weeks;
infants who are less than six weeks of age who develop their RSV lower
respiratory tract disease; children who are immunocompromised; severely
ill infants, those who have high oxygen requirements or mechanical
ventilation and certain chronic debilitating conditions.
Ribavirin may actually have an antiviral effect, and there may even be some
benefit but the clinical benefit, that was discussed in earlier papers hasn't
been supported by some of the newer studies. There is a major concern
that patients who are on mechanical ventilation actually do poorer if they
receive ribavirin than patients who receive the placebo, and the hospitalizations
were more prolonged. The medication may have a role, but we still
have to figure out exactly what that role is. In certain populations at highest
risk for RSV complications, I think it can be considered.
11
Ribavirin – Adverse Events
• Aerosol - rare; minimal systemic absorption
bronchospasm
rash
conjunctivitis
malfunction of ventilator delivery system
• Systemic
- oral or intravenous
anemia
- hyperbilirubinemias
• Ribavirin resistance has not yet been identified
Adverse events. It doesn't have a lot of adverse events. In the aerosol, they
are rare. There is minimal systemic absorption. You can see
bronchospasms, rash, and conjunctivitis can seen (both in the patient and
in the caretakers). You can see malfunction of the ventilator delivery
system. Endotracheal tubes may be clogged as a result of deposition of
ribavirin. Most of the ventilator related problems can be managed with
meticulous care. When given systemically, either oral or intravenously, you
can also see anemia and hyperbilirubinemia. Resistance has not yet been
identified. The use of this agent has been decreasing.
12
Acyclovir/valacyclovir
. acyclovir is a synthetic acyclic purine nucleoside analogue of guanosine
. valacyclovir is L-valyl ester of acyclovir
. hydrolysis of valacyclovir to acyclovir occurs in the intestinal wall and
liver
. valacyclovir is 3-5 limes more bioavailable than acyclovir
Anti-herpes antiviral agents. Valacyclovir together because valacyclovir is
the L-valyl ester of acyclovir. Acyclovir is a synthetic acyclic purine
nucleoside analogue of guanosine. Valacyclovir has one advantage over
acyclovir in that it is about three to five times more bioavailable. This fact
results in improvement in bioavailability.
13
Acyclovir/valacyclovir -- Mechanism of Action
acyclovir is catalyzed to acyclovir MP by herpes virus thymidine kinase
cellular kinases transform acyclovir MP to acyclovir triphosphate
(acyclo-GTP)
acyclovir triphosphate
DNA chain termination (lacks 3'-OH)
terminated DNA chains bind with viral DNA polymerase
Mechanism of action. Acyclovir is catalyzed to the acyclovir monophosphate
by the herpes virus thymidine kinase. So, cells that are not infected with
herpes simplex have about 100-1000 times less phosphorylation of
acyclovir to the acyclovir monophosphate, so that active acyclovir, which is
the acyclovir triphosphate, occurs much, much less commonly in uninfected
cells. The cellular kinases transform the monophosphate to the
triphosphate. Acyclovir does not have a three-pronged hydroxyl group and
this three-pronged hydroxyl group is important for elongation of a forming
DNA molecule. So, if you get incorporation of the acyclo-GTP into the DNA
chain, it will terminate. This terminated chain will turn around and bind with
DNA polymerase. So, that it actually creates chain termination and
inhibition of the DNA polymerase. That slows down replication of herpes
simplex and other herpes viruses.
14
Acyclovir/valacyclovir Indications
Herpes simplex virus infections
• encephalitis • recurrent genital gingivostomatitis
• neonatal HSV • whitlow
• first episode genital • eczema herpeticum
suppression of genital • prophylaxis of seropositive bone marrow
recurrences transplant
recurrent genital
Varicella zoster virus
chicken pox
zoster (shingles)
Indications. It can be life saving and also can reduce the discomfort and
problems associated with those conditions. It also can be indicated for
varicella zoster virus infections, and it may sometimes be used for chicken
pox and for zoster.
15
Acyclovir/valacyclovir
. acyclovir (tablet; syrup; topical; and intravenous)
. valacyclovir (tablet)
. therapy likely to yield greatest benefit:
primary infections
immunocompromised
-initiated early
. dose required for VZV > HSV
Acyclovir is available in a tablet, syrup, topical and intravenous. My
experience is that the topical probably doesn't have much of a role anymore
in use with therapy. If you need to use acyclovir, you should use one of the
systemic forms. Valacyclovir is available in a tablet. Therapy is likely to
yield the greatest clinical benefit for primary infections in
immunocompromised hosts if the dose is initiated very early in the disease.
Also, the dose required to treat varicella zoster virus infections is higher
than what we need for herpes simplex. The reason for that is if you look at
the range of sensitivity in the different agents, you can see that the amount
of acyclovir that is required to inhibit herpes simplex virus is approximately
two to four times lower than with the varicella zoster virus.
16
Acyclovir -- Antiviral Spectrum
HSV 1 0.02-0.2 ug/mL most sensitive
HSV 2 0.03-0.5 ug/mL 2 told less sensitive
VZV 0.8-l.2 ug/mL needs higher dose than HSV
EBV 1.6 ug/mL no viral thymidine kinase
CMV > 22 ug/mL no viral thymidine; resistant
You can see that the Epstein-Barr virus is inhibited somewhat and that the
cytomegalovirus doesn't seem to be very sensitive. Both the Epstein-Barr
virus and the cytomegalovirus lack the viral thymidine kinase that is
required for phosphorylating the acyclovir to the acyclovir monophosphate.
That's the reason that those two viruses don't respond very well to
treatment with acyclovir.
17
Acyclovir/valacyclovir -- Adverse Events
• increased BUN/creatinine • vertigo
• nausea/vomiting • arthralgia
• diarrhea • fever
• itching • headache
• rash
• intravenous
inflammation or phlebitis at injection site
precipitation of acyclovir crystals in renal tubules (prevented by
1 hour infusion time and ensuring adequate hydration)
encephalopathic changes of lethargy, obtundation, tremor (risk is
increased by prior neurologic or renal disease)
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/ hemolytic uremic syndrome
has been noted in a few severely immunocompromised patients
receiving valacyclovir.
Adverse events with acyclovir and valacyclovir. Increased BUN and
creatinine, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, itching, rash, vertigo, arthralgia,
fever, headache. These are all reported. In general, most of them are not
that common but they can occur. With intravenous you will get a much
higher level and you sometimes can get inflammation or phlebitis at the
injection site. You can get precipitation of acyclovir crystals in the renal
tubules and this can be prevented by a one hour infusion and by ensuring
adequate hydration. Encephalopathic changes of lethargy, obtundation,
tremor have been seen. Two of the risks would be patients who have had
prior neurologic disease, child herpes simplex encephalitis, or some other
condition of neurologic disease, or patients who have renal disease who
then get markedly elevated levels of acyclovir because acyclovir is renally
excreted. Patients who have recent hypoxia or those who are receiving
methotrexate also are at increased risk for the encephalopathic changes.
One of the things that has been seen with valacyclovir but not in acyclovir
has been thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura or hemolytic uremic
syndrome. It has been noted only in severely immunocompromised patients
receiving valacyclovir. It seems to be rare, but it certainly can be very life
threatening.
18
Acyclovir/valacyclovir -- Resistance
. thymidine kinase deficient mutants
. alteration of either viral thymidine kinase or viral DNA polymerase
. Risk factors
prolonged exposure
immunocompromised state
. If initial virus is acyclovir sensitive, reactivated latent virus will usually
have same susceptibility to acyclovir as initial strain
. Foscarnet (or cidofovir can be used for acyclovir-resistant HSV/VZV
Resistance. There are a couple of ways that viruses can become resistant
to acyclovir and valacyclovir. The most common mechanism would be
thymidine kinase deficient mutants. So, if you have a herpes simplex virus
that has a mutation where it loses the thymidine kinase, it will no longer
phosphorylate acyclovir to acyclovir monophosphate. There can also be
viruses that have alterations of either the viral thymidine kinase or the viral
DNA polymerase and if those occur, and those occur much less commonly,
the virus also will be resistant then to acyclovir and valacyclovir.
Factors that increase the likelihood of resistance. Resistance after
prolonged exposure hasn’t been as common with suppression of genital
herpes, but resistance is more common after prolonged exposure in
immunocompromised patients. In that set of circumstances, you've got a
situation where you have large quantities of virus replicating with prolonged
exposure to the antiviral agent and that seems to markedly increase the risk
for development of resistance. If the initial virus is acyclovir sensitive,
reactivated latent virus will usually have the same susceptibility to acyclovir
as the initial strain. The next time that they have an outbreak, that virus very
likely will still be acyclovir sensitive because the latent virus hasn't been
affected by being exposed to therapy. Medications that you can use for
acyclovir resistant virus include both foscarnet or cidofovir.
19
Famciclovir
synthetic acyclic guanine derivative
pro-drug of penciclovir (famciclovir is converted to penciclovir)
penciclovir is phosphorylated to penciclovir monophosphate by viral
thymidine kinase
indications, adverse events, and resistance issues are similar as for
famciclovir and acyclovir
Famciclovir. This is also a synthetic acyclic guanine derivative. It is a pro-
drug of penciclovir. Penciclovir is phosphorylated to penciclovir
monophosphate by the viral thymidine kinase. So, it is very similar to what
happens with acyclovir. The indications, adverse events and resistance
issues are pretty similar for famciclovir and acyclovir.
20
Foscarnet Mechanism of Action
• organic analogue of inorganic pyrophosphate
selectively inhibits at pyrophosphate binding site of viral DNA
polymerase and reverse transcriptase at concentrations that do not
affect cellular DNA
prevents elongation of DNA chains
does not require viral thymidine kinase
Indications
1. CMV retinitis in AIDS
2. acyclovir-resistant HSV in immunocompromised hosts
Foscarnet. Foscarnet is the analogue of pyrophosphate. It selectively
inhibits at the pyrophosphate binding site of the viral DNA polymerase and
the reverse transcriptase of HIV at concentrations that do not affect cellular
DNA polymerase. When the pyrophosphate binding site is blocked, it
interferes with removal of phosphate groups that are important for gene
linking, preventing elongation of the DNA chains. But it works in an entirely
different mechanism from acyclovir and valacyclovir. If you have certain
mutations, either thymidine kinase or viral DNA polymerase, that would
make the virus resistant to acyclovir it may still be sensitive to foscarnet.
Indications. The primary ones right now are CMV retinitis in AIDS patients
and acyclovir resistant herpes simplex virus infections in
immunocompromised hosts. In AIDS patients with CMV retinitis, ganciclovir
and foscarnet are fairly similar. However, the patients who received
foscarnet had a slightly greater survival time. Foscarnet is more toxic and
more difficult to deliver. For CMV retinitis in AIDS patient, foscarnet would
be an alternative to ganciclovir; however, there was a slight survival benefit
in the foscarnet recipients as compared to the ganciclovir recipient.
21
Foscarnet -- Adverse Events
increased BUN/creatinine • nausea
hypocalcemia (total or ionized) • anemia
hyper or hypophosphatemia • diarrhea
hypomagnesemia • seizures
hyperkalemia • granulocytopenia
fever • penile/vulvar ulcerations
Adverse events. Foscarnet is a much more nephrotoxic medication than
ganciclovir. It also causes a lot of changes in some of the minerals and
electrolytes resulting in decreased calcium. This is exacerbated in patients
also receiving pentamidine. It results in an increase or decrease in
phosphorus levels, a decrease in magnesium, and an increase in
potassium. You can get fever, nausea, anemia. The anemia is worse if
you're receiving zidovudine. Diarrhea, seizures, granulocytopenia. There
are also penile or vulvar ulcerations. Urination of this medication can cause
ulcerations. So, in order to reduce that, the person should be very well
hydrated or else they will have the ulcerations and burning.
22
Foscarnet -- Precautions
. nephrotoxic agents cause increased nephrotoxicity
. IV pentamidine causes hypocalcemia
. phlebitis common
. foscarnet affects development of tooth enamel and bones in mice and
rats (possibly children)
Precautions. If you use nephrotoxic agents, you can have increased
nephrotoxicity like patients on aminoglycosides, pentamidine. Pentamidine
increases the chance for hypocalcemia. Phlebitis is very common and you
want to get it in a large vein with a good blood flow so you don't end up with
problems of phlebitis. Foscarnet affects the development of tooth enamel
and bones in developing mice and rats. We don't know anything about how
this affects tooth enamel and bone development in children. Foscarnet may
have a role in children, but we need to be cautious.
23
Foscarnet – Resistance
. mutations in viral DNA polymerase
. cross-resistance with other antiviral agents is common
Resistance. The primary mechanism for resistance is mutations in the viral
DNA polymerase that change the pyrophosphate binding site. If you have
a mutation in the viral DNA polymerase that makes the virus resistant to
foscarnet, it is not unusual for it to have cross-resistance with the acyclovir
group of medications as well.
24
Ganciclovir -- Mechanism of Action
. ganciclovir is transformed to ganciclovir MP by enzyme phosphono
transferase that is encoded by UL-97 gene of CMV
. inhibits CMV replication
CMV DNA chain termination
competitive inhibition of CMV DNA polymerase
Ganciclovir is a medication that was recognized to be valuable for CMV.
The reason is that it is transformed to its more active monophosphate form
by an enzyme phosphotransferase that is encoded by a gene of CMV. It
causes chain termination and inhibition of CMV DNA polymerase as does
acyclovir.
25
Ganciclovir -- Indications
. CMV retinitis
Treatment
Prophylaxis
. CMV colitis
. CMV esophagitis
. CMV pneumonitis
Indications. Treatment and prophylaxis of CMV retinitis. It may also be use
for CMV colitis, CMV esophagitis, CMV pneumonitis. With CMV pneumonitis,
if you are going to treat a bone marrow transplant patient or another
similarly immunocompromised patient, you may want to consider using
CMV hyperimmune globulin along with it. Because in the bone marrow
transplant patient, the ganciclovir alone did not have significant benefit but
the combination seemed to have a benefit. Again, we've got the question
mark for congenital CMV. It may have a role for treating active disease. It
is not likely to be able to reverse damage that has already occurred, and we
may actually find that when we look at the risks of this medication and the
benefits, that it may actually have a role for protecting the development of
symptoms that occur with congenital disease.
26
Ganciclovir -- Adverse Events
• granulocytopenia • elevated LFT
• thrombocytopenia • headache
• anemia • confusion
•fever • increased BUN/creatinine
• rash • nausea/vomiting/anorexia
Adverse effects. Ganciclovir does have adverse effects that are common.
Most of the time you can treat through them. It does have a significant effect
on bone marrow. This is also something that is exacerbated in patients
receiving other medications that are affecting the bone marrow like
zidovudine. Granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia and anemia. You get
fever, rashes, mild increases in the LFT, headache, confusion. It has some
mild effects on the kidney and it also may cause some GI problems with
nausea, vomiting and anorexia.
27
Ganciclovir -- Precautions
therapy in immunocompromised patients requires prolonged
maintenance therapy (life-long in HIV)
nephrotoxic drugs cause increased nephrotoxicity
carcinogenic in mice
Precautions. Therapy in immunocompromised patients usually requires
prolonged maintenance therapy. In HIV infected patients, it is lifelong.
Fortunately, there now is both an intravenous and oral form. If you use other
nephrotoxic drugs, you are going to have a much bigger problem with
nephrotoxicity. The other thing is that it is carcinogenic in mice.
28
Ganciclovir -- Resistance
. relatively common during prolonged therapy Ca 8%)
. associated with clinical disease progression
. 2 mechanisms
- alteration of CMV phosphono transferase
- alteration of CMV DNA polymerase
. ganciclovir-resistant CMV may be sensitive to foscarnet and cidofovir
Resistance. If you use ganciclovir in an immunocompromised host for
prolonged periods of time, you are going to see resistance. In AIDS patients
receiving it for retinitis, greater than 8% were resistant. Resistance is
associated with clinical disease progression, so that when you start seeing
resistance, you'll start seeing recurrence of the symptoms that were
present before the medication was started. There are two separate
mechanisms. One is an alteration of the CMV phosphotransferase enzyme.
The other one is alteration of the CMV DNA polymerase. Ganciclovir
resistant CMV may be sensitive to either foscarnet or cidofovir.
29
Cidofovir -- Mechanism of Action
. acyclic nucleoside monophosphate derivative
. cidofovir is phosphorylated to diphosphate by host cell enzymes
. inhibits viral DNA
- competitive inhibitor (normal substrate d CTP
- alternate substrate
. cidofovir inhibits viral DNA polymerase at concentration 50-1000 fold
less than cellular DNA polymerase
Cidofovir is an acyclic nucleoside monophosphate derivative. Cidofovir is
phosphorylated to a diphosphate by host cell enzymes so it does not need
a viral encoded enzyme for phosphorylation. It inhibits viral DNA as a
competitive inhibitor for the normal substrate, deoxycytidine triphosphate,
causing chain termination. Cidofovir inhibits viral DNA polymerase at a
concentration of 50-1000 fold less than cellular DNA polymerases.
30
Cidofovir -- Indications
CMV retinitis (intravenous or intravitreal)
acyclovir-resistant HSV
papillomatous lesions (intra-tumoral injection)
31
Cidofovir -- Spectrum of Activity
Herpes simplex virus (including acyclovir resistant)
Varicella-zoster virus
Cytomegalovirus (including ganciclovir and foscarnet -resistant)
Epstein-Barr Virus
32
Cidofovir -- Adverse Events
neutropenia
peripheral neuropathy
nephrotoxicity (proximal tubular dysfunction)
Nephrotoxicity can be reduced by oral probenecid plus prehydration with
normal saline
Adverse events. Cidofovir can cause neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy
and nephrotoxicity. The nephrotoxicity can be considerable and actually is
very commonly the limiting factor for this medication. It is a proximal tubular
dysfunction and nephrotoxicity can be reduced by giving oral probenecid
plus prehydration with normal saline. Unfortunately, these measures will
not always prevent nephrotoxicity. Medication is usually given once a week
so sometimes you can give it every other week if you want to try to reduce
nephrotoxicity.
33
Cidofovir -- Resistance
. not yet seen in treated patients
. has occurred in vitro
Resistance. It has occurred in vitro. It has not yet been described in patients
who were treated. Since it has been described in vitro, it is likely to happen,
particularly if it gets used with any frequency in immunocompromised
patients.
34
Trifluridine -- Mechanism of Acton
. inhibits thymidylic phosphorylase and specific DNA polymerase necessary
for incorporation of thymidine into viral DNA
. incorporated into viral DNA resulting in faulty viral DNA
Trifluridine. This is a medication that is primarily used topically for
treatment of herpes keratoconjunctivitis. It inhibits the thymidine
phosphorylase and specific DNA polymerase necessary for incorporation
of thymidine into the viral DNA. Incorporating into the viral DNA results in
faulty viral DNA, which cannot grow any further into the replication cycle.
35
Trifluridine -- Indications
. Herpes simplex keratitis
. Herpes simplex keratoconjunctivitis
. Adverse Events
local irritation
photophobia
edema of eyelids and cornea
superficial punctate keratopathy
increased intraocular pressure
Resistance has not yet documented
Indications include herpes simplex keratitis or herpes simplex
keratoconjunctivitis.
Adverse events. It can cause some local irritation and photophobia. You
need to use it usually early in the therapy very frequently, every two to three
hours, and it may cause some edema of the eyelids or the cornea.
Superficial punctate keratopathy and increased intraocular pressure are
pretty rare. Resistance has not yet been documented.
36
Antiretroviral Agents
. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
. Protease inhibitors
Antiretroviral agents. Medications that are available include the nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitors, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase
inhibitors, and the protease inhibitors.
37
Antiretroviral Agents Nucleoside RT Inhibitors
Zidovudine (AZT or ZDV)
Didanosine (ddI)
Zalcitabine (ddC)
Stavudine (d4T)
Lamivudine (3TC)
For the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, we have the original
medication zidovudine or AZT, didanosine or ddI, zalcitabine or ddC,
stavudine or d4T and lamivudine 3TC. Monotherapy with any of these
agents would not be considered optimal.
38
Nucleoside Rt Inhibitors -- Mechanism of Action
. phosphorylated to triphosphate by cellular enzymes
. triphosphate incorporated into viral DNA causing chain termination
These agents are phosphorylated to triphosphate by cellular enzymes and
they work intracellularly. Triphosphate is incorporated into the viral DNA
resulting in chain termination.
39
Nucleoside RT Inhibitors -- Adverse Events
. Zidovudine - hematologic, nausea:, hepatotoxicity
. Didanosine - pancreatitis; neuropathy; diarrhea
. Zalcitabine - neuropathy, pancreatitis
. Stavudine - neuropathy, pancreatitis
. Lamivudine - pancreatitis; hematologic
Adverse events. Zidovudine causes multiple adverse events, which are
relatively common. Most of them, however, are not life threatening or
serious. Anemia and neutropenia are very common. Nausea and some
hepatotoxicity. I think we are now starting to learn that with zidovudine you
can probably live with a lower neutrophil count than you were happy with
before. It is a relatively safe medication but not everyone can tolerate it.
Didanosine. The major adverse effects that we worry about are pancreatitis,
neuropathy and diarrhea. The diarrhea is caused by the buffer that is
included with the medication.
Zalcitabine. Neuropathy and pancreatitis.
Stavudine causes neuropathy and pancreatitis.
Lamivudine. Pancreatitis is a problem and then hematologic. Pancreatitis,
which is something that is seen not uncommon in adults, may occur in
children, but it doesn't seem to be a significant problem. In general, the
nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are relatively well tolerated and
probably out of all of them, zidovudine is the one with the greatest
concerns.
40
Nucleoside RT Inhibitors -- Resistance
. occurs following mutations of viral reverse transcriptase
. likelihood of developing resistance related to:
disease state (symptomatic > asymptomatic)
viral load (higher replication)
combination therapy may prolong time to development of resistance
Resistance. Resistance occurs following mutations of the viral reverse
transcriptase. Symptomatic children are more likely than asymptomatic
children to develop resistance. Probably this is a reflection of viral load
because of higher replication. Viral load is probably one of the key
indicators of how successful you are with your antiretroviral therapy.
Medications, such as zidovudine or didanosine, when used alone result in
such a small decrease in the viral load that there is so much viral replication
still occurring, billions a day, that the expectation should be there that
you will develop resistance. So, for that reason, a combination of therapies
may prolong the time for development of resistance. Combination therapy
has to be adequate to reduce viral replication down to a point where
mutations are not likely to occur. Most people would feel most comfortable
with undetectable virus loads.
41
Antiretroviral Agents – Non-nucleoside RT
Inhibitors
..Nevirapine
..Delavirdine
We now have two non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors,
nevirapine and delavirdine. No phosphorylation is required.
42
Non-nucleoside RT Inhibitors -- Mechanism of
Action
. structurally similar to benzodiazepines
. no phosphorylation required
. non-competitive inhibitor of RT by binding to RT at site distinct from the
substrate binding site
. antiviral effect
protease inhibitors > non-nucleoside RT inhibitors > nucleoside RT
inhibitors
They are noncompetitive inhibitors of reverse transcriptase by binding to
the reverse transcriptase at a site that is distinct from the substrate binding
site. So, they work with an entirely different mechanism than the nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitors. When you look at potency of the antiviral
effect of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, they seem to
be greater in potency than the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors,
but they are not as potent as protease inhibitors.
43
Nevirapine -- Adverse Events
. rash including Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
. fever
. hematotoxicity
. myalgia
Adverse events. Rash. It is relatively common in adults and maybe as many
as 3-5% of adults will go on to develop very severe rash including Stevens-
Johnson syndrome. If you use these medications and step up in the dosing,
you can sometimes reduce the incidence of the rash. You may also see
fever, hepatotoxicity or myalgia.
44
Non-nucleoside RT Inhibitors -- Resistance
. resistance occurs rapidly with monotherapy
. resistance occurs as a result of mutations in reverse transcriptase
. combination with other antiretroviral agents delays development of
resistance
Resistance with monotherapy for these agents occurs very rapidly. Actually,
within a few weeks of monotherapy, you will develop resistance to these
agents. These are agents that can never be used in monotherapy. Even in
situations where you have combination therapy, you have to be concerned
about development of resistance if you don't have immunosuppression of
the virus. So, combination with other antiretroviral agents delays development
of resistance but you really need to be very careful because if you
don't have suppression of replication, you are going to have problems.
45
Antiretroviral Agents -- Protease Inhibitors
. Saquinavir
. Indinavir
. Ritonavir
. Nelfinavir
Protease inhibitors. Saquinavir, indinavir, ritonavir and nelfinavir. They work
by binding to both HIV-1 and HIV-2 protease, rendering it incapable of
cleaving the viral polyprotein precursors into the individual structural
proteins necessary for assembly of new viral progeny.
46
Protease Inhibitors Mechanism of Action
. Binds to both HIV-1 and HIV-2 protease rendering it incapable of cleaving
viral polyproteins precursors into individual structural proteins necessary
for assembly of new viral progeny.
Adverse events. Saquinavir causes nausea, diarrhea and confusion. There
are now some soft gel preparations that may increase bioavailability and for
some older children who can swallow tablets, they may be an alternative.
Indinavir is only available as a tablet but children may be able to take this
as young as age four or five. Nausea is not uncommon. Indirect
hyperbilirubinemia is an issue and this will be an issue particularly in young
infants and newborns. Kidney stones may occur in more than 5%. You
really need to hydrate the patient very well and this isn’t always easy in
children.
47
Protease Inhibitors --Adverse Events
• Saquinavir - nausea, diarrhea, confusion
• Indinavir - nausea; kidney stones, direct hyperbilirubinemia
• Ritonavir- nausea; vomiting, circumoral paresthesia; taste perversion
• Nelfinavir - diarrhea
Ritonavir may cause nausea and vomiting. It is a very difficult medication
to get patients to tolerate. You need to give it with chocolate milk or peanut
butter or something. Circumoral paresthesia, taste perversion. It is not the
best of the medications but it does have a very good antiviral effect.
Nelfinavir is the medication of choice of the protease inhibitors for children
based on the fact that it has the greatest palatability and tolerability. Its
major side effect is diarrhea. There are some concerns that nelfinavir may
not be as potent as some of the other ones but that remains to be seen.
48
Protease Inhibitors -- Resistance
. resistance occurs following mutations in viral Prozac
. cross resistance is common
Resistance occurs following mutations in the viral protease and cross-
resistance is common. If you use the protease inhibitors inappropriately,
then you can develop resistance and it may make it difficult to use any of
the other agents in that same class.
49
Protease Inhibitors -- Drug Interactions
. protease inhibitors inhibit cytochrome P450 activity causing increased
plasma levels of drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450
. protease inhibitors increase activity of glucuronyl transferase causing
decreased plasma levels of drugs metabolized by glucuronyl transferase
Antiviral Agents
Janet Wong, M.D.
2
Antiviral Agents
Respiratory viruses Herpesviruses HIV
Amantadine Acyclovir Zidovudine
Rimantadine Famciclovir Didanosine
Ribavirin Valacyclovir Zalcitabine
Ganciclovir Stavudine
Foscarnet Lamivudine
Cidofovir Nevirapine
Vidarabine Saquinavir
Trifluridine Indinavir
Ritonavir
Nelfinavir
Delavirdine
3
Amantadine/rimantadine -- Mechanism of
Action
adamantyl case structure interferes with transmembrane proton (H+)
transport initiated by influenza A membrane protein M2
blockage of H+ channel reduces intracellular acidification necessary
for fusion of influenza A to host cell endosomal membranes and
release of rind RNA
influenza B lacks M2 protein; not inhibited by either amantadine or
rimantadine
Amantadine and rimantadine have what is called an adamantyl cage
structure. When the virus is endocytize into the cell, the influenza A
membrane protein M2 is responsible for a transmembrane protein transport
which increases the acidity inside of the cell and allows encoding. Both the
adamantyl cage structure of amantadine and rimantadine interferes with
this transmembrane protein hydrogen ion transport and, therefore, there
can't be encoding of the virus. So, that is how these agents interfere with
the influenza A virus replication. Blockage of the hydrogen ion channel
reduces intracellular acidification which is necessary for fusion of the
influenza A to the host cell endosomal membranes and release of viral
RNA. Influenza B lacks the M2 protein and therefore influenza B is not
inhibited by either amantadine or rimantadine.
4
Amantadine/rimantadine -- Indications
• Prophylaxis of influenza A
• Treatment of influenza A
efficacy greatest if given within 48 hours of onset of symptoms
rimantadine does not have FDA indication for treatment in children
Indications for amantadine and rimantadine. Prophylaxis of influenza A as
well as treatment of influenza A. Now, for treatment of influenza A, efficacy
is greatest if the medications are given within 48 hours from the onset of
symptoms. Rimantadine does not have FDA indication for treatment in
children. However, it is equally efficacious with amantadine. I would have
no problems with using rimantadine in children for treatment if I was going
to use the medication because it is certainly much safer than amantadine.
5
Amantadine/rimantadine -- Adverse Events
. Amantadine - similar to antihistamines
nausea and vomiting
- difficulty concentrating
drowsiness
- nervousness
. Rimantadine - all adverse events are rare
- nausea and vomiting
. Both agents may induce seizures in individuals with prior seizure
disorder
Adverse events. Amantadine. They are very similar to the antihistamines.
They include nausea and vomiting, difficulty concentrating, drowsiness,
nervousness. Sometimes, particularly people who take anticholinergic
drugs in addition will end up with hallucinations and nightmares and a
number of CNS complications. With rimantadine, all adverse events are
rare. The most common ones are nausea and vomiting. But actually as
you'll see in controlled trials the frequency of adverse events of all types
and are pretty much equally distributed between the rimantadine recipients
and the placebo recipients. So, it does seem to be a pretty safe medication.
Both of these medications, however, can induce seizures in individuals who
have prior seizure disorder. In nursing homes this may be a problem, but
it isn't usually a big problem for children. The medication can induce
seizures in an individual with a prior history of seizures.
6
Amantadine/rimantadine -- Resistance
. Epidemic strains are usually sensitive
. Resistance occurs frequently during therapy. Resistance is due to single
amino acid mutation of influenza A M2 protein
. Cross resistance is expected
. Resistant strains may be transmitted
Resistance. In general, epidemic strains are usually sensitive to these two
medications. The new strains that come up are almost always sensitive to
these two medications. However, once you start using these medications,
resistance will develop frequently in the patient during therapy. If they
develop resistant virus or if they don't develop resistant virus, it does not
affect their clinical outcome. The development of resistance on therapy
does not seem to interfere with the beneficial effect of the medication, and
it probably is a later phenomenon that occurs after the immune system has
already had enough time to start working on clearance of virus. However,
the resistant strains can be transmitted. The resistance occurs by a single
amino acid mutation of the influenza A M2 protein. Cross-resistance
between amantadine and rimantadine is to be expected.
7
Amantadine/rimantadine--Indications for Prophylaxis
. Immunization with appropriate influenza vaccine is the prevention
method of choice
. Amantadine/rimantadine indications:
(1) when circulating strain is not in vaccine
(2) to be given simultaneously with vaccine, if vaccine is delayed until
start of influenza A outbreak
(3) during an outbreak in institutions or hospitals which have children at
risk who can't take the vaccine (e.g. anaphylaxis to egg protein; age
<6 months)
The indications for prophylaxis. Immunization with an appropriate influenza
vaccine is the prevention method of choice. This method of choice may not
be adequate when the circulating strain is not in the vaccine you may want
to consider chemoprophylaxis. You may want to give rimantadine or
amantadine simultaneously to the vaccine if the vaccine is delayed until the
influenza A outbreak has occurred. This is particularly relevant if you have
a child who currently now is receiving the vaccine that could lead for the
first set of vaccines two doses four weeks apart. If you delayed it until the
onset of the epidemic, you may need to do it with the amantadine and
rimantadine for actually the entire six weeks because it will take four weeks
to get the vaccines in and it takes about two weeks after the second dose
to have an adequate immune response. So, if the vaccine was delayed, you
can use the chemoprophylaxis.
Another indication for prophylaxis would be during an outbreak in institutions
or hospitals, or in home settings in which the child at risk for influenza
related complications (children who have bronchopulmonary dysplasia or
cystic fibrosis). If you have a child who can't take the vaccine, because they
have anaphylaxis to egg protein or their age is less than six months, you
may want to prophylax the individuals around that person in order to try to
reduce the amount of disease. Another situation where prophylaxis would
be indicated is if you have a child who comes to your office who has
influenza and they happen to have a sibling who is at risk for influenza
related complications. It is better to prophylax the family members so that
you can protect the at-risk child, because in general, most of the time,
influenza is going to be a relatively benign disease for the healthy child and
what you are trying to do is prevent disease in the child at risk.
8
Ribavirin--mechanism of Action
. Unknown; may vary from viral species to viral species
. Synthetic nucleoside analogue of guanosine or xanthosine
. Other possible uses
Influenza A (aerosol)
Influenza B (aerosol)
Measles (intravenous; oral or aerosol)
Hemorrhagic fevers (intravenous)
The mechanism of action for this particular agent is still unknown. It works
kind of like a broad spectrum antiviral agent and it may actually work in
different ways for different viral species. It is a synthetic nucleoside
analogue of guanosine or xanthosine.
9
Ribavirin--indications
. RSV lower respiratory tract infections in selected populations (aerosol)
. Lassa fever (intravenous)
Indications. The major indication is for RSV lower respiratory tract
infections in selected populations and it is given by aerosol. It is also
indicated for Lassa fever given intravenously. Ribavirin is effective against
both influenza A and influenza B, and, in some studies, it looks like it has
clinical efficacy for treatment of influenza A and B. There have been
anecdotal reports of success using intravenous, oral or aerosol ribavirin for
the treatment of measles infection. Most of this is noncontrolled, so true
efficacy and safety is not really clear.
10
Ribavirin--indications for Treatment of RSV
Infection
. Ribavirin may be considered for children with:
complicated congenital heart disease
underlying lung disease, especially bronchopulmonary dysplasia and
cystic fibrosis
prematurity (<37 weeks gestation)
infants <6 weeks of age
children who are immunocompromised
severely ill infants (e.g. high oxygen requirements; mechanical
ventilation)
certain chronic, debilitating conditions
The one area where ribavirin is most commonly considered for use is for
treatment of RSV infections. Right now, ribavirin may be considered for
children with RSV infection in a number of specific problems: complicated
congenital heart disease, particularly those that have high pulmonary artery
pressures; underlying lung disease, especially bronchopulmonary dysplasia
and cystic fibrosis; prematurity with a gestation of less than 37 weeks;
infants who are less than six weeks of age who develop their RSV lower
respiratory tract disease; children who are immunocompromised; severely
ill infants, those who have high oxygen requirements or mechanical
ventilation and certain chronic debilitating conditions.
Ribavirin may actually have an antiviral effect, and there may even be some
benefit but the clinical benefit, that was discussed in earlier papers hasn't
been supported by some of the newer studies. There is a major concern
that patients who are on mechanical ventilation actually do poorer if they
receive ribavirin than patients who receive the placebo, and the hospitalizations
were more prolonged. The medication may have a role, but we still
have to figure out exactly what that role is. In certain populations at highest
risk for RSV complications, I think it can be considered.
11
Ribavirin – Adverse Events
• Aerosol - rare; minimal systemic absorption
bronchospasm
rash
conjunctivitis
malfunction of ventilator delivery system
• Systemic
- oral or intravenous
anemia
- hyperbilirubinemias
• Ribavirin resistance has not yet been identified
Adverse events. It doesn't have a lot of adverse events. In the aerosol, they
are rare. There is minimal systemic absorption. You can see
bronchospasms, rash, and conjunctivitis can seen (both in the patient and
in the caretakers). You can see malfunction of the ventilator delivery
system. Endotracheal tubes may be clogged as a result of deposition of
ribavirin. Most of the ventilator related problems can be managed with
meticulous care. When given systemically, either oral or intravenously, you
can also see anemia and hyperbilirubinemia. Resistance has not yet been
identified. The use of this agent has been decreasing.
12
Acyclovir/valacyclovir
. acyclovir is a synthetic acyclic purine nucleoside analogue of guanosine
. valacyclovir is L-valyl ester of acyclovir
. hydrolysis of valacyclovir to acyclovir occurs in the intestinal wall and
liver
. valacyclovir is 3-5 limes more bioavailable than acyclovir
Anti-herpes antiviral agents. Valacyclovir together because valacyclovir is
the L-valyl ester of acyclovir. Acyclovir is a synthetic acyclic purine
nucleoside analogue of guanosine. Valacyclovir has one advantage over
acyclovir in that it is about three to five times more bioavailable. This fact
results in improvement in bioavailability.
13
Acyclovir/valacyclovir -- Mechanism of Action
acyclovir is catalyzed to acyclovir MP by herpes virus thymidine kinase
cellular kinases transform acyclovir MP to acyclovir triphosphate
(acyclo-GTP)
acyclovir triphosphate
DNA chain termination (lacks 3'-OH)
terminated DNA chains bind with viral DNA polymerase
Mechanism of action. Acyclovir is catalyzed to the acyclovir monophosphate
by the herpes virus thymidine kinase. So, cells that are not infected with
herpes simplex have about 100-1000 times less phosphorylation of
acyclovir to the acyclovir monophosphate, so that active acyclovir, which is
the acyclovir triphosphate, occurs much, much less commonly in uninfected
cells. The cellular kinases transform the monophosphate to the
triphosphate. Acyclovir does not have a three-pronged hydroxyl group and
this three-pronged hydroxyl group is important for elongation of a forming
DNA molecule. So, if you get incorporation of the acyclo-GTP into the DNA
chain, it will terminate. This terminated chain will turn around and bind with
DNA polymerase. So, that it actually creates chain termination and
inhibition of the DNA polymerase. That slows down replication of herpes
simplex and other herpes viruses.
14
Acyclovir/valacyclovir Indications
Herpes simplex virus infections
• encephalitis • recurrent genital gingivostomatitis
• neonatal HSV • whitlow
• first episode genital • eczema herpeticum
suppression of genital • prophylaxis of seropositive bone marrow
recurrences transplant
recurrent genital
Varicella zoster virus
chicken pox
zoster (shingles)
Indications. It can be life saving and also can reduce the discomfort and
problems associated with those conditions. It also can be indicated for
varicella zoster virus infections, and it may sometimes be used for chicken
pox and for zoster.
15
Acyclovir/valacyclovir
. acyclovir (tablet; syrup; topical; and intravenous)
. valacyclovir (tablet)
. therapy likely to yield greatest benefit:
primary infections
immunocompromised
-initiated early
. dose required for VZV > HSV
Acyclovir is available in a tablet, syrup, topical and intravenous. My
experience is that the topical probably doesn't have much of a role anymore
in use with therapy. If you need to use acyclovir, you should use one of the
systemic forms. Valacyclovir is available in a tablet. Therapy is likely to
yield the greatest clinical benefit for primary infections in
immunocompromised hosts if the dose is initiated very early in the disease.
Also, the dose required to treat varicella zoster virus infections is higher
than what we need for herpes simplex. The reason for that is if you look at
the range of sensitivity in the different agents, you can see that the amount
of acyclovir that is required to inhibit herpes simplex virus is approximately
two to four times lower than with the varicella zoster virus.
16
Acyclovir -- Antiviral Spectrum
HSV 1 0.02-0.2 ug/mL most sensitive
HSV 2 0.03-0.5 ug/mL 2 told less sensitive
VZV 0.8-l.2 ug/mL needs higher dose than HSV
EBV 1.6 ug/mL no viral thymidine kinase
CMV > 22 ug/mL no viral thymidine; resistant
You can see that the Epstein-Barr virus is inhibited somewhat and that the
cytomegalovirus doesn't seem to be very sensitive. Both the Epstein-Barr
virus and the cytomegalovirus lack the viral thymidine kinase that is
required for phosphorylating the acyclovir to the acyclovir monophosphate.
That's the reason that those two viruses don't respond very well to
treatment with acyclovir.
17
Acyclovir/valacyclovir -- Adverse Events
• increased BUN/creatinine • vertigo
• nausea/vomiting • arthralgia
• diarrhea • fever
• itching • headache
• rash
• intravenous
inflammation or phlebitis at injection site
precipitation of acyclovir crystals in renal tubules (prevented by
1 hour infusion time and ensuring adequate hydration)
encephalopathic changes of lethargy, obtundation, tremor (risk is
increased by prior neurologic or renal disease)
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/ hemolytic uremic syndrome
has been noted in a few severely immunocompromised patients
receiving valacyclovir.
Adverse events with acyclovir and valacyclovir. Increased BUN and
creatinine, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, itching, rash, vertigo, arthralgia,
fever, headache. These are all reported. In general, most of them are not
that common but they can occur. With intravenous you will get a much
higher level and you sometimes can get inflammation or phlebitis at the
injection site. You can get precipitation of acyclovir crystals in the renal
tubules and this can be prevented by a one hour infusion and by ensuring
adequate hydration. Encephalopathic changes of lethargy, obtundation,
tremor have been seen. Two of the risks would be patients who have had
prior neurologic disease, child herpes simplex encephalitis, or some other
condition of neurologic disease, or patients who have renal disease who
then get markedly elevated levels of acyclovir because acyclovir is renally
excreted. Patients who have recent hypoxia or those who are receiving
methotrexate also are at increased risk for the encephalopathic changes.
One of the things that has been seen with valacyclovir but not in acyclovir
has been thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura or hemolytic uremic
syndrome. It has been noted only in severely immunocompromised patients
receiving valacyclovir. It seems to be rare, but it certainly can be very life
threatening.
18
Acyclovir/valacyclovir -- Resistance
. thymidine kinase deficient mutants
. alteration of either viral thymidine kinase or viral DNA polymerase
. Risk factors
prolonged exposure
immunocompromised state
. If initial virus is acyclovir sensitive, reactivated latent virus will usually
have same susceptibility to acyclovir as initial strain
. Foscarnet (or cidofovir can be used for acyclovir-resistant HSV/VZV
Resistance. There are a couple of ways that viruses can become resistant
to acyclovir and valacyclovir. The most common mechanism would be
thymidine kinase deficient mutants. So, if you have a herpes simplex virus
that has a mutation where it loses the thymidine kinase, it will no longer
phosphorylate acyclovir to acyclovir monophosphate. There can also be
viruses that have alterations of either the viral thymidine kinase or the viral
DNA polymerase and if those occur, and those occur much less commonly,
the virus also will be resistant then to acyclovir and valacyclovir.
Factors that increase the likelihood of resistance. Resistance after
prolonged exposure hasn’t been as common with suppression of genital
herpes, but resistance is more common after prolonged exposure in
immunocompromised patients. In that set of circumstances, you've got a
situation where you have large quantities of virus replicating with prolonged
exposure to the antiviral agent and that seems to markedly increase the risk
for development of resistance. If the initial virus is acyclovir sensitive,
reactivated latent virus will usually have the same susceptibility to acyclovir
as the initial strain. The next time that they have an outbreak, that virus very
likely will still be acyclovir sensitive because the latent virus hasn't been
affected by being exposed to therapy. Medications that you can use for
acyclovir resistant virus include both foscarnet or cidofovir.
19
Famciclovir
synthetic acyclic guanine derivative
pro-drug of penciclovir (famciclovir is converted to penciclovir)
penciclovir is phosphorylated to penciclovir monophosphate by viral
thymidine kinase
indications, adverse events, and resistance issues are similar as for
famciclovir and acyclovir
Famciclovir. This is also a synthetic acyclic guanine derivative. It is a pro-
drug of penciclovir. Penciclovir is phosphorylated to penciclovir
monophosphate by the viral thymidine kinase. So, it is very similar to what
happens with acyclovir. The indications, adverse events and resistance
issues are pretty similar for famciclovir and acyclovir.
20
Foscarnet Mechanism of Action
• organic analogue of inorganic pyrophosphate
selectively inhibits at pyrophosphate binding site of viral DNA
polymerase and reverse transcriptase at concentrations that do not
affect cellular DNA
prevents elongation of DNA chains
does not require viral thymidine kinase
Indications
1. CMV retinitis in AIDS
2. acyclovir-resistant HSV in immunocompromised hosts
Foscarnet. Foscarnet is the analogue of pyrophosphate. It selectively
inhibits at the pyrophosphate binding site of the viral DNA polymerase and
the reverse transcriptase of HIV at concentrations that do not affect cellular
DNA polymerase. When the pyrophosphate binding site is blocked, it
interferes with removal of phosphate groups that are important for gene
linking, preventing elongation of the DNA chains. But it works in an entirely
different mechanism from acyclovir and valacyclovir. If you have certain
mutations, either thymidine kinase or viral DNA polymerase, that would
make the virus resistant to acyclovir it may still be sensitive to foscarnet.
Indications. The primary ones right now are CMV retinitis in AIDS patients
and acyclovir resistant herpes simplex virus infections in
immunocompromised hosts. In AIDS patients with CMV retinitis, ganciclovir
and foscarnet are fairly similar. However, the patients who received
foscarnet had a slightly greater survival time. Foscarnet is more toxic and
more difficult to deliver. For CMV retinitis in AIDS patient, foscarnet would
be an alternative to ganciclovir; however, there was a slight survival benefit
in the foscarnet recipients as compared to the ganciclovir recipient.
21
Foscarnet -- Adverse Events
increased BUN/creatinine • nausea
hypocalcemia (total or ionized) • anemia
hyper or hypophosphatemia • diarrhea
hypomagnesemia • seizures
hyperkalemia • granulocytopenia
fever • penile/vulvar ulcerations
Adverse events. Foscarnet is a much more nephrotoxic medication than
ganciclovir. It also causes a lot of changes in some of the minerals and
electrolytes resulting in decreased calcium. This is exacerbated in patients
also receiving pentamidine. It results in an increase or decrease in
phosphorus levels, a decrease in magnesium, and an increase in
potassium. You can get fever, nausea, anemia. The anemia is worse if
you're receiving zidovudine. Diarrhea, seizures, granulocytopenia. There
are also penile or vulvar ulcerations. Urination of this medication can cause
ulcerations. So, in order to reduce that, the person should be very well
hydrated or else they will have the ulcerations and burning.
22
Foscarnet -- Precautions
. nephrotoxic agents cause increased nephrotoxicity
. IV pentamidine causes hypocalcemia
. phlebitis common
. foscarnet affects development of tooth enamel and bones in mice and
rats (possibly children)
Precautions. If you use nephrotoxic agents, you can have increased
nephrotoxicity like patients on aminoglycosides, pentamidine. Pentamidine
increases the chance for hypocalcemia. Phlebitis is very common and you
want to get it in a large vein with a good blood flow so you don't end up with
problems of phlebitis. Foscarnet affects the development of tooth enamel
and bones in developing mice and rats. We don't know anything about how
this affects tooth enamel and bone development in children. Foscarnet may
have a role in children, but we need to be cautious.
23
Foscarnet – Resistance
. mutations in viral DNA polymerase
. cross-resistance with other antiviral agents is common
Resistance. The primary mechanism for resistance is mutations in the viral
DNA polymerase that change the pyrophosphate binding site. If you have
a mutation in the viral DNA polymerase that makes the virus resistant to
foscarnet, it is not unusual for it to have cross-resistance with the acyclovir
group of medications as well.
24
Ganciclovir -- Mechanism of Action
. ganciclovir is transformed to ganciclovir MP by enzyme phosphono
transferase that is encoded by UL-97 gene of CMV
. inhibits CMV replication
CMV DNA chain termination
competitive inhibition of CMV DNA polymerase
Ganciclovir is a medication that was recognized to be valuable for CMV.
The reason is that it is transformed to its more active monophosphate form
by an enzyme phosphotransferase that is encoded by a gene of CMV. It
causes chain termination and inhibition of CMV DNA polymerase as does
acyclovir.
25
Ganciclovir -- Indications
. CMV retinitis
Treatment
Prophylaxis
. CMV colitis
. CMV esophagitis
. CMV pneumonitis
Indications. Treatment and prophylaxis of CMV retinitis. It may also be use
for CMV colitis, CMV esophagitis, CMV pneumonitis. With CMV pneumonitis,
if you are going to treat a bone marrow transplant patient or another
similarly immunocompromised patient, you may want to consider using
CMV hyperimmune globulin along with it. Because in the bone marrow
transplant patient, the ganciclovir alone did not have significant benefit but
the combination seemed to have a benefit. Again, we've got the question
mark for congenital CMV. It may have a role for treating active disease. It
is not likely to be able to reverse damage that has already occurred, and we
may actually find that when we look at the risks of this medication and the
benefits, that it may actually have a role for protecting the development of
symptoms that occur with congenital disease.
26
Ganciclovir -- Adverse Events
• granulocytopenia • elevated LFT
• thrombocytopenia • headache
• anemia • confusion
•fever • increased BUN/creatinine
• rash • nausea/vomiting/anorexia
Adverse effects. Ganciclovir does have adverse effects that are common.
Most of the time you can treat through them. It does have a significant effect
on bone marrow. This is also something that is exacerbated in patients
receiving other medications that are affecting the bone marrow like
zidovudine. Granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia and anemia. You get
fever, rashes, mild increases in the LFT, headache, confusion. It has some
mild effects on the kidney and it also may cause some GI problems with
nausea, vomiting and anorexia.
27
Ganciclovir -- Precautions
therapy in immunocompromised patients requires prolonged
maintenance therapy (life-long in HIV)
nephrotoxic drugs cause increased nephrotoxicity
carcinogenic in mice
Precautions. Therapy in immunocompromised patients usually requires
prolonged maintenance therapy. In HIV infected patients, it is lifelong.
Fortunately, there now is both an intravenous and oral form. If you use other
nephrotoxic drugs, you are going to have a much bigger problem with
nephrotoxicity. The other thing is that it is carcinogenic in mice.
28
Ganciclovir -- Resistance
. relatively common during prolonged therapy Ca 8%)
. associated with clinical disease progression
. 2 mechanisms
- alteration of CMV phosphono transferase
- alteration of CMV DNA polymerase
. ganciclovir-resistant CMV may be sensitive to foscarnet and cidofovir
Resistance. If you use ganciclovir in an immunocompromised host for
prolonged periods of time, you are going to see resistance. In AIDS patients
receiving it for retinitis, greater than 8% were resistant. Resistance is
associated with clinical disease progression, so that when you start seeing
resistance, you'll start seeing recurrence of the symptoms that were
present before the medication was started. There are two separate
mechanisms. One is an alteration of the CMV phosphotransferase enzyme.
The other one is alteration of the CMV DNA polymerase. Ganciclovir
resistant CMV may be sensitive to either foscarnet or cidofovir.
29
Cidofovir -- Mechanism of Action
. acyclic nucleoside monophosphate derivative
. cidofovir is phosphorylated to diphosphate by host cell enzymes
. inhibits viral DNA
- competitive inhibitor (normal substrate d CTP
- alternate substrate
. cidofovir inhibits viral DNA polymerase at concentration 50-1000 fold
less than cellular DNA polymerase
Cidofovir is an acyclic nucleoside monophosphate derivative. Cidofovir is
phosphorylated to a diphosphate by host cell enzymes so it does not need
a viral encoded enzyme for phosphorylation. It inhibits viral DNA as a
competitive inhibitor for the normal substrate, deoxycytidine triphosphate,
causing chain termination. Cidofovir inhibits viral DNA polymerase at a
concentration of 50-1000 fold less than cellular DNA polymerases.
30
Cidofovir -- Indications
CMV retinitis (intravenous or intravitreal)
acyclovir-resistant HSV
papillomatous lesions (intra-tumoral injection)
31
Cidofovir -- Spectrum of Activity
Herpes simplex virus (including acyclovir resistant)
Varicella-zoster virus
Cytomegalovirus (including ganciclovir and foscarnet -resistant)
Epstein-Barr Virus
32
Cidofovir -- Adverse Events
neutropenia
peripheral neuropathy
nephrotoxicity (proximal tubular dysfunction)
Nephrotoxicity can be reduced by oral probenecid plus prehydration with
normal saline
Adverse events. Cidofovir can cause neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy
and nephrotoxicity. The nephrotoxicity can be considerable and actually is
very commonly the limiting factor for this medication. It is a proximal tubular
dysfunction and nephrotoxicity can be reduced by giving oral probenecid
plus prehydration with normal saline. Unfortunately, these measures will
not always prevent nephrotoxicity. Medication is usually given once a week
so sometimes you can give it every other week if you want to try to reduce
nephrotoxicity.
33
Cidofovir -- Resistance
. not yet seen in treated patients
. has occurred in vitro
Resistance. It has occurred in vitro. It has not yet been described in patients
who were treated. Since it has been described in vitro, it is likely to happen,
particularly if it gets used with any frequency in immunocompromised
patients.
34
Trifluridine -- Mechanism of Acton
. inhibits thymidylic phosphorylase and specific DNA polymerase necessary
for incorporation of thymidine into viral DNA
. incorporated into viral DNA resulting in faulty viral DNA
Trifluridine. This is a medication that is primarily used topically for
treatment of herpes keratoconjunctivitis. It inhibits the thymidine
phosphorylase and specific DNA polymerase necessary for incorporation
of thymidine into the viral DNA. Incorporating into the viral DNA results in
faulty viral DNA, which cannot grow any further into the replication cycle.
35
Trifluridine -- Indications
. Herpes simplex keratitis
. Herpes simplex keratoconjunctivitis
. Adverse Events
local irritation
photophobia
edema of eyelids and cornea
superficial punctate keratopathy
increased intraocular pressure
Resistance has not yet documented
Indications include herpes simplex keratitis or herpes simplex
keratoconjunctivitis.
Adverse events. It can cause some local irritation and photophobia. You
need to use it usually early in the therapy very frequently, every two to three
hours, and it may cause some edema of the eyelids or the cornea.
Superficial punctate keratopathy and increased intraocular pressure are
pretty rare. Resistance has not yet been documented.
36
Antiretroviral Agents
. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
. Protease inhibitors
Antiretroviral agents. Medications that are available include the nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitors, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase
inhibitors, and the protease inhibitors.
37
Antiretroviral Agents Nucleoside RT Inhibitors
Zidovudine (AZT or ZDV)
Didanosine (ddI)
Zalcitabine (ddC)
Stavudine (d4T)
Lamivudine (3TC)
For the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, we have the original
medication zidovudine or AZT, didanosine or ddI, zalcitabine or ddC,
stavudine or d4T and lamivudine 3TC. Monotherapy with any of these
agents would not be considered optimal.
38
Nucleoside Rt Inhibitors -- Mechanism of Action
. phosphorylated to triphosphate by cellular enzymes
. triphosphate incorporated into viral DNA causing chain termination
These agents are phosphorylated to triphosphate by cellular enzymes and
they work intracellularly. Triphosphate is incorporated into the viral DNA
resulting in chain termination.
39
Nucleoside RT Inhibitors -- Adverse Events
. Zidovudine - hematologic, nausea:, hepatotoxicity
. Didanosine - pancreatitis; neuropathy; diarrhea
. Zalcitabine - neuropathy, pancreatitis
. Stavudine - neuropathy, pancreatitis
. Lamivudine - pancreatitis; hematologic
Adverse events. Zidovudine causes multiple adverse events, which are
relatively common. Most of them, however, are not life threatening or
serious. Anemia and neutropenia are very common. Nausea and some
hepatotoxicity. I think we are now starting to learn that with zidovudine you
can probably live with a lower neutrophil count than you were happy with
before. It is a relatively safe medication but not everyone can tolerate it.
Didanosine. The major adverse effects that we worry about are pancreatitis,
neuropathy and diarrhea. The diarrhea is caused by the buffer that is
included with the medication.
Zalcitabine. Neuropathy and pancreatitis.
Stavudine causes neuropathy and pancreatitis.
Lamivudine. Pancreatitis is a problem and then hematologic. Pancreatitis,
which is something that is seen not uncommon in adults, may occur in
children, but it doesn't seem to be a significant problem. In general, the
nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are relatively well tolerated and
probably out of all of them, zidovudine is the one with the greatest
concerns.
40
Nucleoside RT Inhibitors -- Resistance
. occurs following mutations of viral reverse transcriptase
. likelihood of developing resistance related to:
disease state (symptomatic > asymptomatic)
viral load (higher replication)
combination therapy may prolong time to development of resistance
Resistance. Resistance occurs following mutations of the viral reverse
transcriptase. Symptomatic children are more likely than asymptomatic
children to develop resistance. Probably this is a reflection of viral load
because of higher replication. Viral load is probably one of the key
indicators of how successful you are with your antiretroviral therapy.
Medications, such as zidovudine or didanosine, when used alone result in
such a small decrease in the viral load that there is so much viral replication
still occurring, billions a day, that the expectation should be there that
you will develop resistance. So, for that reason, a combination of therapies
may prolong the time for development of resistance. Combination therapy
has to be adequate to reduce viral replication down to a point where
mutations are not likely to occur. Most people would feel most comfortable
with undetectable virus loads.
41
Antiretroviral Agents – Non-nucleoside RT
Inhibitors
..Nevirapine
..Delavirdine
We now have two non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors,
nevirapine and delavirdine. No phosphorylation is required.
42
Non-nucleoside RT Inhibitors -- Mechanism of
Action
. structurally similar to benzodiazepines
. no phosphorylation required
. non-competitive inhibitor of RT by binding to RT at site distinct from the
substrate binding site
. antiviral effect
protease inhibitors > non-nucleoside RT inhibitors > nucleoside RT
inhibitors
They are noncompetitive inhibitors of reverse transcriptase by binding to
the reverse transcriptase at a site that is distinct from the substrate binding
site. So, they work with an entirely different mechanism than the nucleoside
reverse transcriptase inhibitors. When you look at potency of the antiviral
effect of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, they seem to
be greater in potency than the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors,
but they are not as potent as protease inhibitors.
43
Nevirapine -- Adverse Events
. rash including Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
. fever
. hematotoxicity
. myalgia
Adverse events. Rash. It is relatively common in adults and maybe as many
as 3-5% of adults will go on to develop very severe rash including Stevens-
Johnson syndrome. If you use these medications and step up in the dosing,
you can sometimes reduce the incidence of the rash. You may also see
fever, hepatotoxicity or myalgia.
44
Non-nucleoside RT Inhibitors -- Resistance
. resistance occurs rapidly with monotherapy
. resistance occurs as a result of mutations in reverse transcriptase
. combination with other antiretroviral agents delays development of
resistance
Resistance with monotherapy for these agents occurs very rapidly. Actually,
within a few weeks of monotherapy, you will develop resistance to these
agents. These are agents that can never be used in monotherapy. Even in
situations where you have combination therapy, you have to be concerned
about development of resistance if you don't have immunosuppression of
the virus. So, combination with other antiretroviral agents delays development
of resistance but you really need to be very careful because if you
don't have suppression of replication, you are going to have problems.
45
Antiretroviral Agents -- Protease Inhibitors
. Saquinavir
. Indinavir
. Ritonavir
. Nelfinavir
Protease inhibitors. Saquinavir, indinavir, ritonavir and nelfinavir. They work
by binding to both HIV-1 and HIV-2 protease, rendering it incapable of
cleaving the viral polyprotein precursors into the individual structural
proteins necessary for assembly of new viral progeny.
46
Protease Inhibitors Mechanism of Action
. Binds to both HIV-1 and HIV-2 protease rendering it incapable of cleaving
viral polyproteins precursors into individual structural proteins necessary
for assembly of new viral progeny.
Adverse events. Saquinavir causes nausea, diarrhea and confusion. There
are now some soft gel preparations that may increase bioavailability and for
some older children who can swallow tablets, they may be an alternative.
Indinavir is only available as a tablet but children may be able to take this
as young as age four or five. Nausea is not uncommon. Indirect
hyperbilirubinemia is an issue and this will be an issue particularly in young
infants and newborns. Kidney stones may occur in more than 5%. You
really need to hydrate the patient very well and this isn’t always easy in
children.
47
Protease Inhibitors --Adverse Events
• Saquinavir - nausea, diarrhea, confusion
• Indinavir - nausea; kidney stones, direct hyperbilirubinemia
• Ritonavir- nausea; vomiting, circumoral paresthesia; taste perversion
• Nelfinavir - diarrhea
Ritonavir may cause nausea and vomiting. It is a very difficult medication
to get patients to tolerate. You need to give it with chocolate milk or peanut
butter or something. Circumoral paresthesia, taste perversion. It is not the
best of the medications but it does have a very good antiviral effect.
Nelfinavir is the medication of choice of the protease inhibitors for children
based on the fact that it has the greatest palatability and tolerability. Its
major side effect is diarrhea. There are some concerns that nelfinavir may
not be as potent as some of the other ones but that remains to be seen.
48
Protease Inhibitors -- Resistance
. resistance occurs following mutations in viral Prozac
. cross resistance is common
Resistance occurs following mutations in the viral protease and cross-
resistance is common. If you use the protease inhibitors inappropriately,
then you can develop resistance and it may make it difficult to use any of
the other agents in that same class.
49
Protease Inhibitors -- Drug Interactions
. protease inhibitors inhibit cytochrome P450 activity causing increased
plasma levels of drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450
. protease inhibitors increase activity of glucuronyl transferase causing
decreased plasma levels of drugs metabolized by glucuronyl transferase
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
