Showing posts with label isotonic saline. Show all posts
Showing posts with label isotonic saline. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Cancer Chemotherapy

Cytotoxic drugs, hormones, antihormones, and biologic agents have become increasingly effective means of treating cancer. Many patients are treated on protocols to provide optimal therapy for refractory or poorly responsive malignancies. Treatment may be inadequate or ineffective because of drug resistance of the tumor cells. This has been attributed to spontaneous genetic mutations in subpopulations of cancer cells prior to exposure to chemotherapy. After chemotherapy has eliminated the sensitive cells, the resistant subpopulation grows to become the predominant cell type (Goldie-Coldman hypothesis). This has been the basis of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy regimens. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance are now the subject of intense study. In many instances, specific drug resistance results from an amplification in the number of gene copies for an enzyme inhibited by a specific chemotherapeutic agent. A more general form of "multidrug resistance" (MDR) has been described in association with expression of a gene (MDR1) encoding a transmembrane glycoprotein of MW 170 (P-glycoprotein) on tumor cells. This protein is an energy-dependent transport pump that facilitates drug efflux from tumor cells and promotes resistance to a broad spectrum of unrelated cancer drugs. Acquired multidrug resistance in multiple myeloma and lymphoma has been reversed clinically by adding the calcium channel blocker verapamil to chemotherapy regimens. Unfortunately, the doses of verapamil required to overcome drug resistance are associated with cardiovascular side effects. High doses of cyclosporine appear to increase the cytotoxicity of etoposide both in vitro and in vivo, probably by inhibiting the function of P-glycoprotein. The use of cyclosporine to enhance the effect of etoposide in purging resistant tumor cells in vitro from autologous bone marrow is under investigation. Cyclosporine has also been shown to enhance the cytotoxic effect of multiagent chemotherapy against resistant multiple myeloma. Verapamil and cyclosporine increase the accumulation and cytotoxicity of daunorubicin in myeloid leukemia cells, enhancing cell kill. MDR modulators will need to be both less toxic and more potent to be clinically useful. An example is the cyclosporine analog PSC 833, with little of the immunosuppressive effects or renal toxicities of cyclosporine but with five- to tenfold greater MDR-modulating activity. Chemotherapy is used to cure a small percentage of malignancies, as adjuvant therapy to decrease the rate of relapse or improve the disease-free interval, and to palliate symptoms in some patients with incurable malignancies. In addition, chemotherapy may play a role as preoperative or "neoadjuvant" therapy to reduce the size and extent of the primary tumor, thereby allowing complete excision at the time of surgery. Chemotherapy was first shown to be curative in the treatment of advanced stages of choriocarcinoma in women. It is also curative in Hodgkin's disease, diffuse large-cell and some high-grade lymphomas (including Burkitt's), carcinoma of the testis, some cases of acute leukemia, and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. When combined with initial surgery—and in some instances with irradiation—chemotherapy increases the cure rate in Wilms' tumor and increases the rate of long-term control and cure of breast cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer, and osteogenic sarcomas. Combination chemotherapy provides palliation and prolongation of survival in adults with Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, mycosis fungoides, multiple myeloma and macroglobulinemia, acute and chronic leukemias, and breast, ovary, and small-cell lung carcinoma as well as carcinoid. Patients with incurable tumors who desire aggressive treatment should be referred for experimental protocol therapy. Tumor cell vaccines combined with immune adjuncts are under investigation as specific immunotherapy for chemotherapy-resistant tumors such as malignant melanoma. High-dose chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation is curative therapy for various types of leukemia, multiple myeloma, and high-risk lymphoma and testicular cancer. Allogeneic or autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells with or without ex vivo purging is used depending on the disease. The use of growth factors and blood stem cells has decreased the toxicity and cost of bone marrow transplantation. Autologous transplantation may now be used with low morbidity and mortality on selected patients up to age 70. In addition, dose-intense chemotherapy regimens with autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue are currently being investigated in the high-risk adjuvant or early relapse setting for patients with carcinoma of the breast and ovaries. A small study suggests that intensive doses of chemotherapy followed by bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell infusion in incurable diseases such as metastatic breast cancer may prolong survival. It is possible that this aggressive approach may be useful even when "cure" is not the objective. While most anticancer drugs are used systemically, there are selected indications for local or regional administration. Regional administration involves direct infusion of active chemotherapeutic agents into the tumor site (eg, intravesical therapy, intraperitoneal therapy, hepatic artery infusion with or without embolization of the main blood supply of the tumor). These treatments can result in palliation and prolonged survival. A summary of the types of cancer responsive to chemotherapy and the current treatments of choice is offered in Table 4–3. In some instances (eg, Hodgkin's disease), optimal therapy may require a combination of therapeutic resources, eg, radiation plus chemotherapy rather than either modality alone. Patients with stages I, II, and IIIA Hodgkin's disease are often treated with radiation alone, avoiding the potential toxicity of systemic chemotherapy. A small percentage of these patients may require chemotherapy later for disease recurrence.
Table 4–3. Treatment choices for cancers responsive to systemic agents.
Diagnosis
Acute lymphocytic leukemia
Acute myelocytic and myelomonocytic leukemia
Chronic myelocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Hairy cell leukemia Hodgkin’s disease (stages III and IV)
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Multiple myeloma
Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia
Polycythemia vera
Carcinoma of lung Small cell Non-small cell3
Carcinoma of the head and neck3 Carcinoma of the esophagus3 Carcinoma of the stomach and pancreas3
Carcinoma of the colon and rectum3
Carcinoma of the kidney3
Carcinoma of the bladder3
Carcinoma of the testis3
Carcinoma of the prostate3
Carcinoma of the uterus3 Carcinoma of the ovary3
Carcinoma of the cervix3
Carcinoma of the breast3
Current Treatment of Choice
Induction: Combination chemotherapy. Adults:
Vincristine, prednisone, daunorubicin, and asparaginase.
Children: Vincristine, prednisone with or without
asparaginase.
Consolidation: Multiagent alternating chemotherapy.
Allogeneic bone marrow transplant for young adults or
high-risk disease or second remission. CNS prophylaxis
with intrathecal methotrexate with or without whole brain
radiation.
Remission maintenance: Methotrexate, thioguanine.
Induction: Combination chemotherapy with cytarabine
and an anthracycline (daunorubicin, idarubicin).
Tretinoin for acute promyelocytic leukemia.
Consolidation: High-dose cytarabine. Autologous
(with or without purging) or allogeneic bone marrow
transplantation for high-risk disease or second remission.
Hydroxyurea, alpha interferon. Allogeneic bone marrow
transplantation for young patients.

Chlorambucil and prednisone or fludarabine (if treatment
is indicated).

Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine; CdA).
Combination chemotherapy: doxorubicin (Adriamycin),
bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) or
mechlorethamine, vincristine, prednisone, procarbazine
(MOPP) or alternating MOPP/ABVD or MOPP/ABV,
autologous bone marrow transplant for high-risk patients
or relapsed disease.
Combination therapy depending on histologic classification
but usually including cyclophosphamide, vincristine,
doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHOP) with or without
other agents. Autologous bone marrow transplantation in
high-risk first remission or first relapse.
Combination chemotherapy: melphalan and prednisone
or melphalan, cyclophosphamide, carmustine,
vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone. Autologous
bone marrow transplantation in first complete or partial
remission. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for
young patients with poor prognosis disease.
Chlorambucil versus combination chemotherapy:
cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone. Allogeneic
bone marrow transplantation for high-risk young patients.
Hydroxyurea, phlebotomy

Combination chemotherapy: cisplatin and etoposide.
Palliative radiation therapy.
Advanced disease: cisplatin, vinorelbine
Localized disease: cisplatin, vinblastine
Combination chemotherapy: cisplatin and fluorouracil

Combination chemotherapy: fluorouracil, cisplatin,
mitomycin
Stomach: etoposide, leucovorin,2 fluorouracil (ELF)
Pancreas: fluorouracil or ELF, gemcitabine

Colon: fluorouracil plus levamisole (adjuvant) or with
leucovorin.2
Rectum: fluorouracil with radiation therapy (adjuvant)
Floxuridine, vinblastine, IL-2, alpha interferon

Intravesical BCG or thiotepa. Combination
chemotherapy: methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin
(Adriamycin), cisplatin (M-VAC) or CMV alone
Combination chemotherapy: etoposide and cisplatin
Autologous bone marrow transplantation for high-risk or
relapsed disease.
Estrogens or LHRH analog (leuprolide) plus an
antiandrogen (flutamide)

Progestins or tamoxifen
Combination chemotherapy: cyclophosphamide and
cisplatin (or carboplatin) or paclitaxel and cisplatin/
carboplatin
Combination chemotherapy: methotrexate,
doxorubicin, cisplatin, and vinblastine; or mitomycin,
bleomycin, vincristine, and cisplatin
Combination chemotherapy: cyclophosphamide,
doxorubicin, fluorouracil, or cyclophosphamide,
methotrexate, fluorouracil. Tamoxifen for estrogen/
progesterone receptor-positive tumors. Adjuvant therapy
for high-risk patients and for limited metastatic disease:


Other Valuable Agents and Procedures
Doxorubicin, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, teniposide (VM-26),1 allopurinol,2 autologous bone marrow transplantation
Mitoxantrone, idarubicin, etoposide,
mercaptopurine, thioguanine,
azacitidine,1 amsacrine,1
methotrexate, doxorubicin, tretinoin,
allopurinol,2 leukapheresis, prednisone

Busulfan, mercaptopurine,
thioguanine, cytarabine, plicamycin, melphalan,
autologous bone marrow transplantation, allopurinol2
Vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin,
Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine; CdA),
androgens,2 allopurinol2
Pentostatin (deoxycoformycin), alpha interferon
Carmustine, lomustine, etoposide,
thiotepa, autologous bone marrow transplantation

Bleomycin, methotrexate, etoposide,
chlorambucil, fludarabine, lomustine, carmustine,
cytarabine, thiotepa, amsacrine, mitoxantrone,
autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Etoposide, cytarabine, alpha interferon,
dexamethasone, autologous bone marrow
transplantation

Etoposide, alpha interferon, doxorubicin,
dexamethasone, plasmapheresis, autologous bone
marrow transplantation
Busulfan, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide, alpha
interferon, radiophosphorus 32P
Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine

Doxorubicin, etoposide, mitomycin

Methotrexate, bleomycin,
hydroxyurea, doxorubicin, vinblastine
Methotrexate, bleomycin,
doxorubicin, mitomycin
Carmustine, mitomycin, lomustine,
doxorubicin, gemcytidine.
Doxorubicin, methotrexate, cisplatin, combinations
for stomach
Methotrexate, mitomycin, carmustine,
cisplatin, floxuridine

Alpha interferon, progestins, infusional FUDR,
fluorouracil
Cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil

Bleomycin, vinblastine, ifosfamide,
mesna,2 carmustine, carboplatin

Ketoconazole, doxorubicin,
aminoglutethimide, progestins, cyclophosphamide,
cisplatin, estramustine, vinblastine, etoposide,
suramin1
Doxorubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil, ifosfamide
Docetaxel, topotecan

Carboplatin, ifosfamide, lomustine

Mitoxantrone, vinblastine, paclitaxel,
docetaxel, topotecan, thiotepa, vincristine,
carboplatin, cisplatin/carboplatin, mitomycin,
vinorelbine, progestins, androgens, aminoglutethimide

Choriocarcinoma (trophoblastic neoplasms)3  Dose intensification or autologous bone marrow transplantation. Methotrexate or dactinomycin (or both) plus chlorambucil  Vinblastine, cisplatin, mercaptopurine, doxorubicin, bleomycin, etoposide
Carcinoma of the thyroid gland3 Carcinoma of the adrenal  Radioiodine (131I) Mitotane  Doxorubicin, cisplatin, bleomycin, melphalan Doxorubicin, suramin1
gland3 Carcinoid3 Osteogenic sarcoma3 Soft tissue sarcoma3 Melanoma3 Kaposi’s sarcoma Wilms’ tumor (in children)3 Neuroblastoma3  Fluorouracil plus streptozocin with or without alpha interferon High-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, vincristine Doxorubicin, dacarbazine Dacarbazine, alpha interferon, IL-2 Vincristine alternating with vinblastine or vincristine alone. Palliative radiation therapy. Combination chemotherapy: vincristine and dactinomycin with or without doxorubicin after surgery and radiation therapy Combination chemotherapy: variations of cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, dacarbazine  Doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, octreotide, cyproheptadine,2 methysergide2 Cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, bleomycin, dacarbazine, cisplatin, dactinomycin Ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate, vincristine Carmustine, lomustine, melphalan, thiotepa, cisplatin, paclitaxel,1 tamoxifen, vincristine Alpha interferon, bleomycin, etoposide doxorubicin Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, etoposide, cisplatin Melphalan, ifosfamide, autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

1Investigational agent. Treatment is available through qualified investigators and centers authorized
by the National Cancer institute and Cooperative Oncology Groups.
2Supportive agent; not oncolytic.
3These tumors are generally managed initially with surgery with or without radiation therapy
with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. For metastatic disease, the role of palliative radiation
therapy is as important as that of chemotherapy.

Table 4–4 sets forth the currently used dosage schedules and toxicities of the most commonly used cancer chemotherapeutic agents.
The dosage schedules given are for single-agent therapy. Combination therapy is used for many diseases, including advanced-stage
Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and testicular carcinoma. Hematologic or other toxicity may limit the therapeutic
effectiveness of chemotherapy. It is possible to avoid the need for dose reductions or delay in therapy by using granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; sargramostim).

Scroll right to see more columns.

Table 4–4. Single agent dosage and toxicity of anticancer drugs.
Drug Alkylating agents  Dosage  Acute Toxicity  Delayed Toxicity
Mechlorethamine  6–10 mg/m2 IV every 3  Severe vesicant; severe  Moderate suppression of blood counts.
weeks  nausea and vomiting  Melphalan effect may be delayed 4–6 weeks.
Excessive doses produce severe bone
marrow suppression with leukopenia,
Chlorambucil  0.1–0.2 mg/kg/d orally  None  thrombocytopenia, and bleeding.
(6–12 mg/d) or 0.4  Alopecia and hemorrhagic cystitis occur with
mg/kg pulse every 4  cyclophosphamide, while busulfan can cause
weeks  hyperpigmentation, pulmonary fibrosis, and
weakness (see text). Ifosfamide
Cyclophosphamide  100 mg/m2/d orally for  Nausea and vomiting with  is always given with mesna to prevent
14 days; 400 mg/m2  higher doses  cystitis. Acute leukemia may develop
orally for 5 days; 1–1.5  in 5–10% of patients receiving prolonged
g/m2 IV every 3–4 weeks  therapy with melphalan, mechlorethamine, or
chlorambucil; all alkylators probably increase
the risk of secondary malignancies with
prolonged use. Most cause either
Melphalan  0.25 mg/kg/d orally for 4  None  temporary or permanent aspermia/
days every 6 weeks  amenorrhea.
Busulfan  2–8 mg/d orally;  None
150–250 mg/course
Carmustine (BCNU)  200 mg/m2 IV every 6  Local irritant  Prolonged leukopenia and thrombocytopenia .
weeks  Rarely hepatitis. Acute leukemia has been
observed to occur in some patients
Lomustine (CCNU)  100–130 mg orally  Nausea and vomiting  receiving nitrosoureas. Nitrosoureas can
every 6–8 weeks  cause delayed pulmonary fibrosis with
prolonged use.
Procarbazine  100 mg/m2/d orally for  Nausea and vomiting  Bone marrow suppression, mental
14 days every 4 weeks  suppression, MAO inhibition, disulfiram-like
effect
Dacarbazine  250 mg/m2/d IV for 5  Severe nausea and  Bone marrow suppression; flu-like syndrome
days every 3 weeks;  vomiting; anorexia
1500 mg/m2 IV as
single dose

Cisplatin 50–100 mg/m2 IV every  Severe nausea and vomiting
3 weeks; 20 mg/m2 IV
for 5 days every 4 weeks
Carboplatin 360 mg/m2 IV every 4  Severe nausea and vomiting
weeks
Structural analogs or antimetabolites
Methotrexate 2.5–5 mg/d orally;  None
20–25 mg IM twice
weekly; high-dose:
500–1000 mg/m2 IV
every 2–3 weeks;
12–15 mg intrathecally
every week for 4–6
doses
Mercaptopurine 2.5 mg/kg/d orally; 100  None
mg/m2/d orally for 5
days for induction
Thioguanine 2 mg/kg/d orally; 100  Mild nausea, diarrhea
mg/m2/d IV for 7 days
for induction
Fluorouracil 15 mg/kg/d IV for 3–5  None
days every 3 weeks; 15
mg/kg weekly as
tolerated; 500–1000
mg/m2 IV every 4 weeks
Cytarabine 100–200 mg/m2/d for  High-dose: nausea,
5–10 days by  vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia
continuous IV infusion;
2–3 g/m2 IV every 12
hours for 3–7 days; 20
mg/m2 SC daily in
divided doses
Hormonal agents
Testosterone 100 mg IM 3 times  None
propionate weekly
Fluoxymesterone 20–40 mg/d orally  None
Flutamide 250 mg 3 times a day  None
orally
Diethylstilbestrol 1–5 mg/d orally in  Occasional nausea and
divided doses  vomiting
Ethinyl estradiol 3 mg/d orally  None
Tamoxifen 20 mg/d orally in 2  Transient flare of bone pain
divided doses
Megestrol acetate 40 mg orally 4 times daily  None
Anastrazole 1 mg orally daily  None
Hydroxyproges­1 g IM twice weekly  None
terone caproate
Medroxyproges­100–200 mg/d orally;  None
terone 200–600 mg orally twice
weekly
Adrenocorticosteroid
Prednisone 20–100 mg/d orally or  Alteration in mood
50–100 mg every other
day orally with systemic
chemotherapy
Aromatase inhibitor
Aminoglutethimide 500 mg/d orally, along  Initial drowsiness
with hydrocortisone, 40
mg/d orally
GnRH analogs
Leuprolide 7.5 mg IM (depot) once  Local irritation, transient
a month; 1 mg/d SC  flare of symptoms
Goserelin acetate 3.6 mg SC monthly  Transient flare of symptoms
Biologic response modifiers
Interferon alfa-2a 3–5 million units  Fever, chills, fatigue,
Interferon alfa-2b SC 3 times weekly or  anorexia
daily
Aldesleukin (IL-2) 600,000 IU/kg IV over  Hypotension, fever, chills,
15 minutes every 8  rigors, diarrhea, nausea,
hours for 14 doses,  vomiting, pruritus, liver,
repeated after 9-day  kidney, and CNS toxicity,
rest period. Some  capillary leak (primarily at
doses may be withheld  high doses), pruritic skin
or interrupted because  rash, infections (can be
of toxicity. Caution:  severe)
High doses must be
administered in an ICU
setting by experienced

Nephrotoxicity, mild otic and bone marrow
toxicity, neurotoxicity.

Bone marrow suppression, prolonged
anemia; same as cisplatin but milder.

Bone marrow suppression, oral and
gastrointestinal ulceration, acute renal failure;
hepatotoxicity, rash, increased toxicity when
effusions are present. Note: Citrovorum
factor (leucovorin) rescue for doses over 100
mg/m2.

Well tolerated. Larger doses cause bone
marrow suppression

Well tolerated. Larger doses cause bone
marrow suppression

Nausea, diarrhea, oral and gastrointestinal
ulceration, bone marrow suppression,
dacryocystitis.

Nausea and vomiting; cystitis; severe bone
marrow suppression; megaloblastosis; CNS
toxicity with high-dose cytarabine.

Fluid retention, masculinization, leg cramps.
Cholestatic jaundice in some patients
receiving fluoxymesterone.
Gynecomastia, hot flushes, decreased libido,
mild gastrointestinal side effects.
Fluid retention, feminization, uterine bleeding,
exacerbation of cardiovascular disease,
painful gynecomastia,
thromboembolic disease.
?Increased risk of venous thrombosis;
anovulation

Occasional fluid retention; rare thrombosis,
weight gain.

Fluid retention, hypertension, diabetes,
increased susceptibility to infection, "moon
facies," osteoporosis, electrolyte
abnormalities, gastritis.

Transient skin rash, which usually subsides
with continued therapy; weight gain, fluid
retention, leg cramps; cholestatic jaundice.

Hot flushes, decreased libido, impotence,
gynecomastia, mild gastrointestinal side effects
.

General malaise, weight loss, confusion

Hypoglycemia, anemia

personnel.
Peptide hormone inhibitor
Octreotide acetate  100–600 mg/d SC in 2  Local irritant; nausea and  Diarrhea, abdominal pain, hypoglycemia.
divided doses  vomiting
Natural products and miscellaneous agents
Vinblastine  0.1–0.2 mg/kg or 6  Mild nausea and vomiting;  Alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, bone
mg/m2 IV weekly  severe vesicant  marrow suppression, constipation, SIADH,
areflexia.
Vincristine  1.5 mg/m2 (maximum: 2  Severe vesicant  Areflexia, muscle weakness, peripheral
mg weekly)  neuropathy, paralytic ileus, alopecia (see
text), SIADH.
Vinorelbine  30 mg/m2 IV weekly  Mild nausea and vomiting,  Granulocytopenia, constipation, peripheral
fatigue, severe vesicant  neuropathy, alopecia
Paclitaxel  135 mg/m2 by  Hypersensitivity reaction  Peripheral neuropathy, bone marrow
continuous infusion over  (premedicate with  suppression, fluid retention.
24 hours every 3 weeks  diphenhydramine and
dexamethasone), mild
Docetaxel  60–100 mg/m2 IV every  nausea and vomiting
3 weeks
Dactinomycin  0.04 mg/kg IV weekly  Nausea and vomiting;  Alopecia, stomatitis, diarrhea, bone marrow
severe vesicant  suppression.
Daunorubicin  30–60 mg/m2 daily IV  Nausea, fever, red urine  Alopecia, stomatitis, bone marrow
for 3 days, or 30–60  (not hematuria); severe  suppression, late cardiotoxicity. Risk of
mg/m2 IV weekly  vesicant; acute cardiotoxicity  cardiotoxicity increases with radiation,
cyclophosphamide.
Idarubicin  12 mg/m2 daily IV for 3
days
Doxorubicin  60 mg/m2 IV every 3
weeks to a maximum
total dose of 550 mg/m2
Liposomal  20 mg/m2 IV every 3
Doxorubicin  weeks
Daunorubicin  40 mg/m2 IV every 2
weeks
Etoposide  100 mg/m2/d IV for 5  Nausea and vomiting;  Alopecia, bone marrow suppression.
days or 50–150 mg/d  occasionally hypotension
orally
Plicamycin  25–50 mg/kg IV every  Nausea and vomiting  Thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, hepatotoxicity,
(mithramycin)  other day for up to 8  nephrotoxicity, stomatitis.
doses
Mitomycin  10–20 mg/m2 every 6–8  Severe vesicant; nausea  Prolonged bone marrow suppression, rare
weeks  hemolytic-uremic syndrome.
Mitoxantrone  12–15 mg/m2/d IV for 3  Mild nausea and vomiting  Alopecia, mild mucositis, bone marrow
days with cytarabine;  suppression.
8–12 mg/m2 IV every 3
weeks
Bleomycin  Up to 15 units/m2 IM,  Allergic reactions, fever,  Fever, dermatitis, pulmonary fibrosis.
IV, or SC twice weekly  hypotension
to a total dose of 200
units/m2
Hydroxyurea  500–1500 mg/d orally  Mild nausea and vomiting  Hyperpigmentation, bone marrow
suppression.
Mitotane  6–12 g/d orally  Nausea and vomiting  Dermatitis, diarrhea, mental suppression,
muscle tremors.
Fludarabine  25 mg/m2/d IV for 5  Nausea and vomiting  Bone marrow suppression, diarrhea, mild
days every 4 weeks  hepatotoxicity, immune suppression.
Cladribine (CdA)  0.09 mg/kg/d by  Mild nausea, rash, fatigue  Bone marrow suppression, fever, immune
continuous IV infusion  suppression.
for 7 days
Topotecan  1.5 mg/kg IV daily for 5  Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,  Alopecia, bone marrow suppression.
days every 3 weeks  headache, dyspnea
Tretinoin  45 g/m2 by mouth until  Retinoic acid syndrome (fever, dyspnea, pleural or pericardial effusion)
remission or for 90 days  must be treated emergently with dexamethasone; headache, dry skin rash,
flushing.
Gemcitabine  1000 mg/m2 every week  Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,  Bone marrow suppression, rash, fluid
up to 7 weeks, then 1  fever, dyspnea  retention, mouth sores, flu-like symptoms,
week off, then weekly  paresthesias.
for 3 out of 4 weeks
Supportive agents
Allopurinol  300–900 mg/d orally for  None  Rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome; enhances
prevention or relief of  effects and toxicity of mercaptopurine when
hyperuricemia  used in combination.
Mesna  20% of ifosfamide  Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea  None
dosage at the time of
ifosfamide
administration, then 4
and 8 hours after each
dose of chemotherapy
to prevent hemorrhagic

cystitis
Leucovorin  10 mg/m2 every 6 hours  None  Enhances toxic effects of fluorouracil.
IV or orally until serum
methotrexate levels are
below 5 ´ 10–8 mol/L
with hydration and
urinary alkalinization
(about 72 hours)
Amifostine  910 mg/m2 IV daily, 30  Hypotension, nausea,  Decrease in serum calcium.
minutes prior to  vomiting, flushing
chemotherapy
Dexrazoxane  10:1 ratio of  Pain on injection  Increased bone marrow suppression.
anthracycline IV, before
(within 30 minutes of)
chemotherapy infusion
Pilocarpine  5–10 mg orally 3 times  Sweating, headache, flushing; nausea, chills, rhinitis, dizziness, and
hydrochloride  daily  urinary frequency at high dosage
Pamidronate  90 mg IV every month  Symptomatic hypoglycemia  None
(rare), flare of bone pain,
local irritation
Epoetin alfa  100–300 units/kg IV or  Skin irritation or pain at  Hypertension, headache, seizures in
(erythropoietin)  SC 3 times a week  injection site  patients on dialysis (rare).
Filgrastim (G-CSF)  5 mg/kg/d SC or IV  Mild to moderate bone pain,  ?Unknown risk of tumor cell stimulation.
mild hypotension (rare),
irritation at injection sites
(rare)
Sargramostim  250 mg/kg/d as a 2-hour  Fluid retention, dyspnea,
(GM-CSF)  IV infusion (can be  capillary leak (rare),
given SC)  supraventricular tachycardia
(rare), mild to moderate
bone pain, irritation at
injection sites

Hormonal therapy also plays an important role in cancer management. Hormonal therapy or ablation is important in treatment and palliation of breast and prostatic carcinoma, while added progestins are useful in suppression of endometrial carcinoma. Women with metastatic breast cancer who show objective improvement with hormonal therapy have tumors that contain cytoplasmic estrogen and progesterone receptors. Antiestrogens (eg, tamoxifen) and aromatase inhibitors (eg, anastrazole or megestrol acetate) that block peripheral conversion of adrenal androgens into estrogens have substantial additive effects to—or may obviate the need for—oophorectomy in premenopausal women whose tumors are estrogen- or progesterone receptor-positive. Hormonal approaches are also available to treat prostate cancer, though androgen receptors remain difficult to measure. These include the use of estrogen therapy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (eg, leuprolide), aromatase inhibitors (eg, aminoglutethimide), and antiandrogens (eg, flutamide). The use of leuprolide plus flutamide can be considered as an alternative to orchiectomy but also causes impotence. High-dose ketoconazole has been used to rapidly suppress adrenal production of steroids in crises such as cord compression. Use of this agent requires hydrocortisone supplementation. Several recombinant growth factors have been shown to be effective in the treatment of malignancy. Recombinant alpha interferon has marked antitumor effects in hairy cell leukemia and chronic myelogenous leukemia, moderate effects in lymphomas, in the epidemic (AIDS-associated) form of Kaposi's sarcoma, in multiple myeloma, and as adjuvant therapy for malignant melanoma. Alpha interferon has some utility also in metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and carcinoid syndrome. Patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia may benefit from treatment with alpha interferon and achieve both a hematologic and cytogenetic remission. Patients with a cytogenetic response to interferon (about 30% of treated patients) have longer survival than patients treated with standard oral chemotherapy. The addition of alpha interferon to systemic chemotherapy for multiple myeloma appears to enhance the degree of cytoreduction achieved as compared with chemotherapy alone; toxicity is additive. Use of alpha interferon for myeloma following chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow transplant has prolonged remission duration, though overall survival may not be altered. Another cytokine, interleukin-2, when administered alone or in combination with lymphocyte-activated killer cells or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, exhibits marked antitumor activity in a minority of patients with melanoma or renal cancer, though its use is associated with marked toxicity. In addition to cytokines, other agents have recently been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of some tumors. For chronic lymphocytic leukemia and low-grade lymphomas, fludarabine phosphate, cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine; CdA), and pentostatin (2-deoxycoformycin) are effective. Studies using cladribine to treat hairy cell leukemia have resulted in a high remission rate that is durable with tolerable toxicities after a 1-week course of therapy. Pentostatin has been approved for use in hairy cell leukemia. Paclitaxel is a novel agent isolated from the Pacific yew tree that has been found to be effective in reducing tumor size in 20–35% of patients with refractory metastatic ovarian cancer, though most patients experienced rapid disease progression after an initial response; paclitaxel combined with carboplatin appears to be more effective than cyclophosphamide plus carboplatin in the adjuvant setting. Dose intensification as well as intraperitoneal instillation may also be helpful. The toxicity of paclitaxel is primarily hematologic and neurologic. The hematologic toxicity is dose-dependent and can be ameliorated by the use of myeloid growth factors. Effectiveness has been demonstrated in metastatic carcinoma of the breast as well as in other cancers. Docetaxel, a synthetic analog of paclitaxel, has recently been approved and is effective also in the treatment of advanced malignancies, especially breast cancer. Toxicities are similar to those of paclitaxel. Vinorelbine, a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, has recently been approved for use in treating advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Response rates of 30% have been observed when vinorelbine is used as a single agent in this poorly responsive tumor. Current studies are evaluating combination chemotherapy, including vinorelbine, in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and other tumors. Newer experimental cancer therapies are discussed briefly at the end of this chapter.
 10040:7:1 Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP: Chorionic tumors. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1740. (Review of the clinical presentation and treatment of this curable tumor.)
 10040:7:2 Chabner BA: Biological basis for cancer treatment. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:633. (A discussion of cancer biology as the basis of drug discovery research and a review of novel cancer therapies.)
 10040:7:3 O'Brien S, del Giglio A, Keating M: Advances in the biology and treatment of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1995;85:307. (Fludarabine treatment results in high complete remission rates and may allow more aggressive subsequent therapy.)
 10040:7:4 Philip T et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1540. (Bone marrow transplantation for chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed lymphoma markedly improves event-free survival over standard salvage chemotherapy [46% versus 12% at 5 years].)
 10040:7:5 Pritchard RS, Anthony SP: Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced, unresectable, non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:723. (Fourteen articles with 2589 patients suggested a 2-month mean gain in life expectancy when chemotherapy was added to radiation therapy.)
 10040:7:6 Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC: Paclitaxel (Taxol). N Engl J Med 1995;332:1004. (A thorough review, including mechanisms of action, toxicity, and antitumor effects.)
 10040:7:7 Saven A, Piro LD: Treatment of hairy cell leukemia. Blood 1992;79:1111. (Current and investigational treatments of hairy cell leukemia, including interferon, deoxycoformycin, and cladribine.)
 10040:7:8 Yuen A, Sikic BI: Multidrug resistance in lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2453. (Review of multidrug resistance in lymphomas and status of ongoing trials using modulating agents.)


Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Micrometastases
One of the most important roles of cancer chemotherapy is as adjuvant therapy to eradicate or suppress minimal residual disease after primary field treatment with surgery or irradiation. Failure of primary field therapy to eradicate tumor is due principally to occult micrometastases of tumor stem cells outside the primary field. These distant micrometastases are more likely to be present in patients with positive lymph nodes at the time of surgery (eg, breast cancer), in patients with tumors known to have a propensity for early hematogenous spread (eg, osteogenic sarcoma, Wilms' tumor), and in patients with certain pathologic or molecular risk factors (eg, high proliferative index, vascular invasion, oncogene amplification). Given specific risk factors, the risk of recurrent or metastatic disease can be extremely high (> 80%). Only systemic therapy can adequately prevent micrometastases. Chemotherapeutic regimens that have been shown to be effective in inducing regression of advanced cancers may be curative when combined with surgery for high-risk "early" cancer. More data are now available to support the use of adjuvant therapy in several neoplasms. Prolongation of survival times has been shown for women (especially premenopausal women) with breast cancer and positive or negative axillary lymph nodes (stages I, II, and III) from combination chemotherapy following surgical resection; there are several useful regimens. Node-negative patients are treated with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) or variants, whereas high-risk, node-positive patients are generally treated with regimens that include doxorubicin. Neoadjuvant (preoperative) and perioperative chemotherapy are also used and may improve surgical resectability or time to disease progression. The antiestrogen tamoxifen is used routinely either with or without antecedent chemotherapy if receptors for estrogen and progesterone are present. The role of amplification of the c-erbB-2 or Her-2/neu oncogene in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer is a subject of current research. In postmenopausal women, tamoxifen alone may be used. The main challenge in treating women with node-negative (stage I) breast cancer is to identify prognostic factors to determine which patients are at higher risk and therefore more likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus levamisole is now indicated in Dukes C (node-positive) colon cancer and has been shown to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. Earlier clinical trials employing semustine (methyl-CCNU) appeared to result in an increased risk of both leukemia and renal insufficiency. The omission of semustine from combination regimens still results in enhanced cure rates with decreased local and overall tumor recurrence. Other tumors that have been shown to respond to adjuvant therapy include osteogenic sarcoma, ovarian cancer, and malignant melanoma. Adjuvant therapy remains investigational and unproved for a number of common tumors, including non-small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer. Patients with Hodgkin's disease or testicular carcinoma do not benefit from adjuvant therapy. Although adjuvant therapy has been shown to reduce the rate of recurrence for some cancers, there is still a high failure rate (up to 80% in high-risk breast cancer despite adjuvant therapy). In most cases, tumor recurrence signifies incurability. There is clear evidence of a dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in some cancers; however, doses have been limited by bone marrow toxicity. Current studies are investigating the use of dose-intense chemotherapy regimens with or without autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue in the high-risk adjuvant setting for patients with carcinoma of the breast, testis, and ovaries. Otherwise incurable patients with testicular cancer have been cured by this intensive treatment approach. Nonrandomized studies suggest efficacy with tolerable side effects of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support in the setting of high-risk breast cancer (more than ten positive lymph nodes). Multicenter trials are now in progress comparing aggressive adjuvant chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for high-risk breast cancer. The use of marrow transplantation for high-risk ovarian cancer remains controversial, though long-lived responses in otherwise incurable patients have been documented. Patients with advanced ovarian cancer at high risk for recurrence may now be considered for treatment in a multicenter randomized study comparing transplantation with standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Young patients with high-risk malignancies should be considered for entry into clinical trials investigating this aggressive, potentially curable therapy. 10040:8:1 [Physicians' Data query: Information on cancer treatment] http://cancernet.nci.nih.gov/h_treat.htm
 10040:8:2 Bonadonna G et al: Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: The results of 20 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med 1995;332:901. (Long-term improvement in survival in patients with node-positive breast cancer randomized to receive adjuvant chemotherapy following mastectomy.)
 10040:8:3 Cannistra SA: Cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1550. (A review of risk factors, presentation, staging, surgical treatment and chemotherapy, and prognosis.)
 10040:8:4 Gradishar WJ, Tallman MF, Abrams JS: High-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:599. (A review of this controversial but widely used therapy.)
 10040:8:5 Moertel CG: Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1136.
 10040:8:6 Trimble EL et al: Neoadjuvant therapy in cancer treatment. Cancer 1993;72:3515. (Increasing indications.)

Toxicity and Dose Modification of Chemotherapeutic Agents
A number of cancer chemotherapeutic agents have cytotoxic effects on rapidly proliferating normal cells in bone marrow, mucosa, and skin. Still other drugs such as the vinca alkaloids produce neuropathy, and hormones often have psychologic effects. Acute and chronic toxicities of the various drugs are summarized in Table 4–4. Appropriate dose modification usually minimizes these side effects, so that therapy can be continued with relative safety.
Bone Marrow Toxicity
Depression of bone marrow is usually the most serious limiting toxicity of cancer chemotherapy. Autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation or rescue can reduce the myelosuppressive toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy; however, cost and toxicity limit its general use. Growth factors that stimulate myeloid proliferation (eg, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF; filgrastim] and granulocyte-macrophage stimulating factor [GM-CSF]; sargramostim) or erythroid proliferation (erythropoietin [epoetin alfa]) are now used to ameliorate bone marrow toxicity. G-CSF and GM-CSF have been shown to shorten the period of neutropenia following both standard and high-dose chemotherapy. Mucosal toxicity is also reduced. The myeloid growth factors are also used to stimulate circulation of progenitor cells in the peripheral blood either at steady state or during white blood cell recovery following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. These cells are then harvested using an apheresis machine and frozen for later use. When stimulated peripheral blood progenitor cells are used instead of or in conjunction with bone marrow for autologous transplantation following high-dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy, recovery of both neutrophils and platelets may be hastened by as much as 7–10 days as opposed to the use of bone marrow alone. Epoetin alfa (erythropoietin) has been shown to improve anemia associated with malignancy. Patients must have adequate iron stores to respond to this agent, and even patients with marrow infiltration with tumor may benefit. Higher doses are necessary for patients with cancer than for patients with renal failure (100–150 units/kg compared with 50 units/kg). It is useful to check the level of erythropoietin before instituting therapy. Very high levels (> 500 ng/mL) predict a poor response. Erythropoietin is usually given by subcutaneous injection three times a week. Thrombocytopenia remains a problem with high doses of or prolonged exposure to chemotherapeutic agents and may limit therapy. Several agents may help with this problem. Interleukin-3 stimulates myeloid growth and, to a lesser extent, platelet recovery. The megakaryocyte growth factor thrombopoietin has been cloned and is the subject of intense study. Clinical trials using thrombopoietin in a variety of circumstances are under way. Commonly used short-acting drugs that affect the bone marrow are the alkylating agents (eg, cyclophosphamide, melphalan, chlorambucil), procarbazine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, vinblastine, fluorouracil, dactinomycin, and doxorubicin. In general, it is preferable to use alkylating agents in intensive "pulse" courses every 3–4 weeks rather than to administer the drugs in continuous daily schedules. This allows for complete hematologic (and immunologic) recovery between courses rather than continuously suppressing the bone marrow with a cytotoxic agent. Pulse therapy reduces side effects to some degree but does not reduce therapeutic efficacy. The standard dosage schedules required to produce tumor responses with these agents often induce bone marrow depression. Continuing some drugs in the face of falling blood counts may result in severe bone marrow aplasia with pancytopenia, bleeding, or infection. Simple guidelines for treatment and follow-up can usually prevent severe marrow depression. With long-term chemotherapy, counts should be obtained initially at weekly intervals; the frequency of counts may be reduced only after the patient's sensitivity to the drug can be well predicted (eg, 3–4 months) and cumulative toxicity excluded. In patients with normal blood counts as well as normal liver and kidney function, drugs should be started in full dosages. Bone marrow toxicity is cumulative over time, and this must be anticipated during follow-up. Patients with bone marrow involvement may tolerate chemotherapy poorly initially, with improved counts on future cycles as the tumor burden is reduced. Drug dosage can usually be modified as a function of the peripheral white blood count or platelet count (or both). These modifications assume that the blood counts are checked shortly before the next course of chemotherapy is to be administered. Dosage modifications are used primarily for repeated courses of oral alkylator or antimetabolite therapy but should be avoided when possible if treatment is given with curative intent. A scheme for dosage modification is presented in Table 4–5. Alternatively, the interval between drug courses can be lengthened, thereby permitting more complete hematologic recovery and repetition of full-dose chemotherapy. Both dosage modification and delay of chemotherapy limit the efficacy of treatment.

Table 4–5. A common scheme for dose modification of cancer chemotherapeutic agents.1
Granulocyte Suggested Drug
Count Platelet Count (/mL) Dosage (% of full dose)
> 2000/µL > 100,000/µL 100%
1000–2000/µL 75,000–100,000/µL 50%
< 1000/µL < 50,000/µL 0% 1In general, dose modification should be avoided if full recovery is expected within 1–2 weeks. Chemotherapy can be delayed and given after recovery at full dosage to maintain therapeutic efficacy.
 10040:9:1 ASCO Ad Hoc Colony-Stimulating Factor Guideline Expert Panel: American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2471. (Standard practice guidelines.)
 10040:9:2 Kaushansky K: Thrombopoietin: The primary regulator of megakaryocyte and platelet production. Thromb Haemost 1995;74:521. (A review of current preclinical data.)
 10040:9:3 Vose JM, Armitage JO: Clinical applications of hematopoietic growth factors. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1023.

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea & Vomiting
A number of cytotoxic anticancer drugs induce nausea and vomiting. In general, these symptoms are thought to originate in the central nervous system rather than peripherally. Parenteral administration of agents such as doxorubicin, etoposide, or cyclophosphamide frequently is associated with mild to moderate nausea and vomiting, whereas nitrosoureas, dacarbazine, and particularly cisplatin usually cause severe symptoms. Combination chemotherapy can also cause severe symptoms. Antiemetics clearly reduce and often eliminate nausea and vomiting associated with these drugs and are especially useful in conjunction with cisplatin. Metoclopramide is a particularly useful agent, especially when administered parenterally at a dosage of 1–2 mg/kg both 30 minutes before and again 30 minutes after the administration of chemotherapy. Extrapyramidal signs may be induced with this drug but frequently can be suppressed with 25–50 mg of oral or parenteral diphenhydramine. Dexamethasone has antiemetic effects when administered at a dosage of 6–10 mg either as a single dose prior to or both prior to and every 6 hours following the administration of chemotherapy for two to four total doses. Both of these drugs are more potent than conventional agents such as prochlorperazine, diphenhydramine, and thiethylperazine. Prochlorperazine is given at a dose of 10 mg orally or intravenously every 6 hours. The total dose given over 24 hours should not exceed 40 mg. A 25 mg rectal suppository is available and may be useful for patients who are too nauseated to swallow pills without experiencing further emesis. Unfortunately, all phenothiazines can induce extrapyramidal side effects. Thiethylperazine is given at a dose of 10 mg every 8 hours by mouth and is also available at the same dose in a rectal suppository. Lorazepam has both antiemetic and sedating effects and is administered at a dose of 0.5–1 mg every 4–6 hours by the sublingual route, making it particularly useful in the outpatient setting. Older patients may have intolerable psychologic side effects. Combinations of antiemetics (eg, metoclopramide with dexamethasone and lorazepam) are often more effective than maximal doses of any one agent for blocking cisplatin-induced vomiting. 5-Hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (ondansetron, granisetron) have now replaced high-dose metoclopramide in the treatment and prevention of emesis. A new and very potent class of antiemetics, these drugs are serotonin receptor-blocking agents that have few side effects. They are both more effective and less toxic than metoclopramide in cisplatin-treated patients. They are also effective against radiation-induced and postanesthetic vomiting as well as for patients with refractory nausea and vomiting following administration of other chemotherapeutic agents. Ondansetron is administered by the parenteral route at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg for three doses or orally at a dose of 8 mg every 8 hours. The first dose is given 30 minutes before the start of chemotherapy; subsequent doses are given 4 and 8 hours after the first dose. A typical antiemetic regimen might include ondansetron combined with 0.5–1 mg of lorazepam (sublingual) or 10 mg of prochlorperazine orally or intravenously and dexamethasone (10 mg orally), omitting both metoclopramide and diphenhydramine. For less emetogenic regimens, ondansetron alone may be no more effective than metoclopramide and dexamethasone and is usually used only for failure to control nausea with less expensive combination regimens. Granisetron is a long-acting serotonin receptor antagonist that is given as a single dose of 10 mg/kg intravenously 30 minutes before chemotherapy or orally at a dosage of 1–2 mg/d. The half-life of granisetron is 9 hours, and 24-hour dosing is recommended by the manufacturer. Ondansetron may also be effective in a single daily parenteral dose of 32 mg. Both agents appear to be more effective when given in conjunction with dexamethasone. Dronabinol (D9-tetrahydrocannabinol) is effective in some patients at a dose of 5 mg/m2 prior to and then every 2–4 hours following chemotherapy for a total of four to six doses a day. Dronabinol may cause undesirable side effects such as dysphoria, and it is available only for oral administration. A patient receiving antiemetics (eg, lorazepam, prochlorperazine, metoclopramide) along with chemotherapy on an outpatient basis must be escorted to and from the clinic, since the antiemetics often induce marked sedation and transient impairment of balance and reflexes. Antiemetics are more effective when given prophylactically. Therefore, regular dosing of an agent such as lorazepam or prochlorperazine is recommended after chemotherapy until the emetogenic effects have dissipated. This is dependent on the patient as well as on the type of chemotherapy administered. One problem with all combinations of antiemetic agents is the development of tachyphylaxis over 4–5 days with continuing highly emetogenic chemotherapy. This limits the effectiveness of any regimen.
 10040:10:1 Grunberg SM et al: Control of chemotherapy-induced emesis. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1790. (Mechanisms and treatment.)
 10040:10:2 Perez EA: Review of the preclinical pharmacology and comparative efficacy of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists for chemotherapy-induced emesis. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1036. (This is a highly effective class of antiemetic agents, and all three studied appear to be relatively equivalent.)

Gastrointestinal & Skin Toxicity
Since antimetabolites such as methotrexate and fluorouracil act only on rapidly proliferating cells, they damage the cells of mucosal surfaces such as the gastrointestinal tract. Methotrexate has similar effects on the skin. These toxicities are at times more serious than bone marrow suppression, and they should be looked for routinely when these agents are used. Erythema of the buccal mucosa is an early sign of mucosal toxicity. If therapy is continued beyond this point, oral ulceration will develop. In general, it is wise to discontinue therapy at the time of appearance of early oral ulceration. This finding usually heralds the appearance of similar but potentially more serious ulceration at other sites lower in the gastrointestinal tract. Therapy can usually be reinstituted when the oral ulcer heals (7–10 days). The dose of drug used may need to be modified downward at this point, with titration to an acceptable level of mucosal toxicity. Adequate mouth care with antimicrobial mouthwashes and attention to dental hygiene are essential and may prevent severe toxicity. Common mouthwashes include the microbicidal oral rinse chlorhexidine and a mixture of salt and bicarbonate of soda in warm water, which aids in debridement of dead mucosa. A prophylactic antifungal mouthwash such as nystatin oral suspension may also be used. High doses of methotrexate require special consideration as noted in the following section. Radiation therapy may cause xerostomia, which can lead to difficulty in swallowing, discomfort, and gum disease. Pilocarpine hydrochloride, 5–10 mg orally three times a day, can relieve symptoms of dry mouth but must be used regularly.

Miscellaneous Drug-Specific Toxicities
The toxicities of individual drugs have been summarized in Table 4–4. Several of these warrant additional mention, since they occur with commonly administered agents, and special preventive measures are often indicated.
A. Hemorrhagic Cystitis Induced by Cyclophosphamide or Ifosfamide: Metabolic products of cyclophosphamide that retain cytotoxic activity are excreted into the urine. Some patients appear to metabolize more of the drug to these active excretory products. If their urine is concentrated, the toxic metabolite may cause severe bladder damage. Patients receiving cyclophosphamide must be advised to maintain a high fluid intake. Early symptoms of bladder toxicity include dysuria and frequency despite the absence of bacteriuria. Such symptoms develop in about 20% of patients who receive the drug chronically. If microscopic hematuria develops, it is advisable to stop the drug temporarily or switch to a different alkylating agent, increase fluid intake, and administer a urinary analgesic such as phenazopyridine. With severe cystitis, large segments of bladder mucosa may be shed and the patient may have prolonged gross hematuria. Such patients should be observed for signs of urinary obstruction and may require cystoscopy for removal of obstructing blood clots. The risk of developing hemorrhagic cystitis is dose-related. For high doses of cyclophosphamide, preventive continuous bladder irrigation with 0.9% saline solution is used during the period of drug administration and for the following 24 hours. The cyclophosphamide analog ifosfamide can cause severe hemorrhagic cystitis when used alone. However, when it is used in conjunction with a series of doses of the neutralizing agent mesna, bladder toxicity can be prevented. Mesna can also be used to prevent cystitis in patients receiving cyclophosphamide in high doses.
B. Vincristine-Induced Neuropathy: Neuropathy is a toxic side effect that is peculiar to the vinca alkaloid drugs, especially vincristine. The peripheral neuropathy can be sensory, motor, autonomic, or a combination of these effects. In its mildest form, it consists of paresthesias of the fingers and toes. Occasional patients develop acute jaw or throat pain after vincristine therapy. This may be a form of trigeminal or glossopharyngeal neuralgia. With continued vincristine therapy, the paresthesias may extend to the proximal interphalangeal joints, hyporeflexia can appear in the lower extremities, and weakness may develop in the quadriceps muscle group. At this point, it is wise to discontinue vincristine therapy until the neuropathy has subsided. A useful means of judging whether peripheral motor neuropathy is severe enough to warrant stopping treatment is to have the patient attempt to do deep knee bends or rise from a chair without using the arm muscles. Constipation is the most common symptom of autonomic neuropathy associated with vincristine therapy. Patients receiving vincristine should be started on stool softeners and mild cathartics when therapy is begun; otherwise, severe impaction may result along with an atonic bowel. More serious autonomic involvement can lead to acute intestinal ileus with signs indistinguishable from those of an acute abdomen. Bladder neuropathies are uncommon but may be severe. These two complications are absolute contraindications to continued vincristine therapy. The majority of symptoms from vincristine are mild and resolve slowly after therapy has been completed. Paclitaxel, cisplatin, carboplatin, and vinorelbine can also cause peripheral neuropathy, though as a rule symptoms improve gradually after treatment is stopped.
C. Methotrexate Toxicity and Citrovorum Rescue: In addition to standard uses of methotrexate for cancer chemotherapy, this drug is also used in very high doses that could lead to fatal bone marrow toxicity if given without an antidote. High-dose methotrexate therapy with leucovorin rescue is routinely used to treat osteogenic sarcoma, acute lymphocytic leukemia, and some cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The bone marrow and mucosal toxicity of methotrexate can be prevented by early administration of leucovorin. Serum levels of methotrexate are usually monitored and doses of leucovorin adjusted accordingly. Rescue is required for methotrexate doses over 80 mg/m2 and is usually begun within 4 hours after completing treatment. Up to 100 mg/m2 of leucovorin is given initially every 6 hours, with further doses adjusted for the serum methotrexate level. Rescue is usually continued orally for 3 days or longer until the serum methotrexate level is below 0.05 mmol/L. If an overdose of methotrexate is administered accidentally, leucovorin therapy should be initiated as soon as possible, preferably within 1 hour. Intravenous infusion should be employed for larger overdosages to ensure adequate drug delivery. It is generally advisable to give leucovorin repeatedly in this situation. Vigorous hydration and bicarbonate loading also appear to be important in preventing crystallization of high-dose methotrexate in the renal tubular epithelium. Serum creatinine is determined before beginning therapy and daily thereafter, since methotrexate excretion is slowed by renal insufficiency and toxicity will be enhanced. In high doses, methotrexate can itself cause renal injury. Methotrexate doses are reduced in renal insufficiency. Concomitant use of certain drugs will slow methotrexate excretion, and they are avoided during therapy. These drugs include aspirin, NSAIDs, penicillins, sulfonamides, and probenecid.
D. Busulfan Toxicity: The alkylating agent busulfan, occasionally used for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia, has curious delayed toxicities, including increased skin pigmentation, a wasting syndrome similar to that seen in adrenal insufficiency, and progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Patients who develop either of the latter two problems should be switched to a different drug (eg, melphalan) when further therapy is needed. The pigmentary changes are innocuous and will usually regress slowly after treatment is discontinued. Long-term treatment with busulfan also results in an increased risk of secondary leukemias.
E. Bleomycin Toxicity: This antibiotic has found increasing application in cancer chemotherapy in view of its activity in squamous cell carcinomas, Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, and testicular tumors. Bleomycin can produce edema of the interphalangeal joints and hardening of the palmar and plantar skin. More serious toxicities include an anaphylactic or serum sickness-like reaction and a potentially fatal pulmonary fibrotic reaction (seen especially in elderly patients receiving a total dose of over 300 units). If a nonproductive cough, dyspnea, and pulmonary infiltrates develop, the drug is discontinued, and high-dose corticosteroids are instituted as well as empiric antibiotics pending cultures. Fever alone or with chills is an occasional complication of bleomycin treatment and is not an absolute contraindication to continued treatment. The fever may be avoided by hydrocortisone administration just prior to the injection. Fever alone is not predictive of pulmonary toxicity. About 1% of patients (especially those with lymphoma) may have a severe or even fatal hypotensive reaction after the initial dose of bleomycin. In order to identify and treat such patients, it is wise to administer a test dose of 5 units of bleomycin first and to have adequate monitoring and emergency facilities available. Patients exhibiting a hypotensive reaction should not receive further bleomycin therapy.
F. Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiomyopathy: The anthracycline antibiotics doxorubicin and daunomycin both have acute and delayed cardiac toxicity. The problem is greater with doxorubicin because it has a major role and is used in repeated doses in the treatment of sarcomas, breast cancer, lymphomas, acute leukemia, and certain other solid tumors. Studies of left ventricular function and endomyocardial biopsies indicate that some changes in cardiac dynamics occur in most patients by the time they have received 300 mg/m2 of doxorubicin. The multiple-gated ("MUGA") radionuclide cardiac scan is the most useful noninvasive test for assessing toxicity. Doxorubicin should not be used in elderly patients with intrinsic cardiac disease. In general, patients should not receive a total dose in excess of 550 mg/m2, and 1–10% of patients who receive this dose develop cardiomyopathy. Patients who have had prior chest or mediastinal radiotherapy may develop doxorubicin heart disease at lower total doses. The appearance of a high resting pulse may herald the appearance of cardiac toxicity. Unfortunately, the toxicity may be irreversible and frequently fatal at dosage levels above 550 mg/m2. At lower doses (eg, 350 mg/m2), the symptoms and signs of cardiac failure generally respond well to digitalis, diuretics, and cessation of doxorubicin therapy. Recent evidence suggests that cardiac toxicity can be correlated with high peak plasma levels obtained with intermittent high-dose bolus therapy (eg, every 3–4 weeks). Use of weekly injections or low-dose continuous infusion schedules appears to delay the occurrence of cardiac toxicity. Current laboratory studies suggest that cardiac toxicity may be due to a mechanism involving the formation of intracellular free radicals in cardiac muscle. Pretreatment with dexrazoxane, an iron chelator that decreases free radical formation, appears to protect the myocardium from anthracycline-induced injury but may also reduce the anticancer efficacy of the anthracycline. Dexrazoxane is now approved for the prevention of cardiomyopathy in women with metastatic breast cancer receiving cumulative doxorubicin doses > 300 mg/m2. Liposomally encapsulated doxorubicin and daunorubicin have been FDA-approved and appear to have minimal cardiac toxicity. Their main use to date has been to treat Kaposi's sarcoma. Newer anthracycline analogs include idarubicin, which has shown efficacy against acute nonlymphocytic leukemia and breast cancer when used in combination with other agents. Idarubicin appears to have a similar potential for causing cardiotoxicity when compared with other anthracyclines, though a maximum lifetime dosage recommendation has not yet been made.
G. Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity and Neurotoxicity: Cisplatin is effective in the treatment of testicular, bladder, and ovarian cancer as well as in several other types of tumor. Nausea and vomiting are common, but nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity are more serious. Vigorous hydration with or without mannitol diuresis may substantially reduce nephrotoxicity. Renal function must be carefully monitored during cisplatin therapy, as should serum magnesium, which may fall during therapy with this agent. Ototoxicity is a potentially serious neurotoxicity that can result in deafness. The neurotoxicity of this drug is delayed and is more common after a total dose of 300 mg/m2. Other manifestations include peripheral neuropathy of mixed sensorimotor type that may be associated with painful paresthesias. These supportive measures do not appear to reduce the therapeutic effectiveness of cisplatin. The second-generation platinum analog carboplatin is now available and has been shown to be as effective as cisplatin in ovarian cancer. Carboplatin is less nephrotoxic and causes less severe nausea or vomiting, but it does induce myelosuppression. Amifostine, an organic thiophosphate initially developed as a radioprotective agent, has efficacy in preventing renal toxicity from cisplatin. It has recently been approved to reduce cumulative renal toxicity associated with repeat administration of cisplatin in advanced ovarian cancer. In addition, amifostine may reduce cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced hematologic toxicity and neurotoxicity. Glutathione also appears to be a promising agent in preventing cisplatin neurotoxicity. Glutathione was given at a dose of 1.5 g/m2 intravenously before cisplatin administration, then at a dose of 600 mg by intramuscular injection on days 2–5.
H. Alpha Interferon Toxicities: While alpha interferon is generally tolerated in the standard doses listed in Table 4–4, it has increasing toxicity with increasing doses and is more toxic in elderly patients. Even standard doses may be intolerable to some patients. Fever and chills are initial side effects but are infrequent after continued treatment. These symptoms may be ameliorated or prevented by premedication with acetaminophen and bedtime dosing. However, anorexia, fatigue, and weight loss can be cumulative and with time may become severe. These symptoms may be dose- or treatment-limiting. Thirty percent or more of patients are intolerant of interferon therapy even at low doses. In some patients, central nervous system symptoms develop, usually manifested as confusion or somnolence. Reduction in peripheral blood counts can develop, but this abnormality is usually not clinically important and may even be a desired effect in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. These interferon-induced side effects are sometimes confused with the symptoms of progressive cancer. The side effects usually clear within 1 week after cessation of interferon therapy.

Friday, August 13, 2010

Antibiotics and Outpatient Infections

Antibiotics and Outpatient Infections

David Kramer, M.D.

Antibiotic Therapy

Factors in Choosing an Antibiotic

Clinical syndrome

Host characteristics

Focused history

Antibiotic characteristics

When you are choosing an agent to use, you are looking at

what clinical symptoms the patient has, who is this patient, an

immunocompromised or normal host. You are taking a little bit

more of a detailed history to include infectious risks, and you

are thinking about the antibiotic itself.



3 Assessment of Clinical Syndromes

Identify predominant symptoms and signs

Determine the site of infection

Identify disease process

Determine likely causative organisms

Identify likely susceptibility pattern

In a clinical syndrome, you are trying to identify what is the

predominant symptom and signs. You are trying to see where

the site of infection is. Is this infection in the joint? Is this

infection in the bone? Where are we treating this infection?

Does this patient have a central nervous system infection?

Then, identify the disease process because if you identify that

this is osteomyelitis, it is a little bit different than if you think that

the patient has pyogenic arthritis. The causative organisms

might change and then what you need do, is you need to think

of what the disease is, what are the most likely pathogens

associated with this disease and what is their susceptibility

pattern in the area where you practice. This is essential. To pick

a drug, you have to know what organism you are dealing with.

Because if not, you are really doing it blindly. So you have to

have an idea of what organisms cause what specific diseases

so that then you can make a good choice about antibiotic

therapy.



4 Host Characteristics

Age

Underlying conditions

Medical devices

Nutritional status

When you look at hosts, you need to know the age of the

patient. A 10-year-old is different from a neonate. The patho-

gens are different. Think about underlying conditions. Is this a

patient with cystic fibrosis with pneumonia, or is this a well child

with pneumonia? Different pathogens. So you are thinking

about that host. Does this patient have an indwelling catheter?

Does the patient have a prosthetic heart valve? All these things

make it a little different to know which antibiotic to choose.

Then, is the patient malnourished because that might be a

cause for immunodeficiency.



5 Focused History

Travel

Exposures

Immunizations

Drug abuse

Sexual activity

When you are looking at a focused history, you need to know if

the patient you are seeing with fever for 10 days has just come

back from a safari in Africa, or is this a patient who has just

been in the community where there is a lot of influenza. So you

are going to ask about travel, about exposure to people who

have contagious diseases such as tuberculosis, or whether the

child is exposed to more infections because he is in daycare.

Are immunizations up to date? That is very important. That

patient may have measles if they have never been immunized

and there is an increase in your community of Hemophilus

influenza type E,. which is now very rare but can occur. Is this

adolescent an IV drug abuser? Unfortunately, this happens

occasionally and it brings in another set of organisms and

diseases we have to think about, and then sexual activity brings

up another whole host of organisms and disease processes.



6 Antibiotic Selection Factors

Spectrum of activity

Absorption

Distribution

Metabolism

Excretion

Adverse Effects

Safety

Routes of administration

Drug-drug interactions

Cost

Palatability

Effect on Resident Flora

Selective Pressure on environment

When we finally make that decision to select an antibiotic, we

must ask, Does the antibiotic cover the organisms that I am

thinking about? Is it well absorbed? Does it get to the site of

infection? Oral vancomycin is not good to treat Staph aureus

because it does not get absorbed from the GI tract. What are

the adverse effects? How safe is this drug? Do I have to

monitor drug levels? What is the route of administration? Can

I give it orally? Is it as good orally as it is IV? Are there other

interactions with other drugs, I might not want to use

erythromycin because it might change the levels of the

cyclosporin? How much does it cost? Is there a cheaper

alternative? Does it taste good? Because if it doesn't taste good

nobody, is going to take it. And no matter how good the

antibiotic is for that infection, if it is not taken, it is not of use.

Then, things that we think of in a more global setting are what

will this do to the patient's flora, and will this alter the flora and

then transmit resistant organisms? So, usually when you are

selecting an antibiotic, you are looking at all of these factors

and then making the decision based on the best antibiotic.



7 General Principles of Antibiotic Therapy

May initiate with broad spectrum awaiting culture results

Obtain pertinent cultures to narrow therapy

Use narrowest spectrum antibiotic as possible

The general principle is that you initiate broad spectrum

antibiotics awaiting culture results, then based on culture

results, you can narrow therapy. It is really best to use the

narrowest spectrum antibiotic possible for the infection,

especially now in the era of increasing antimicrobial resistance.

We really want to keep the very broad spectrum antibiotics for

when we need them. Ceftriaxone for treatment of otitis should

not be used because we have other, much narrower, alterna-

tives for otitis media and I want to save ceftriaxone to have an

antibiotic to treat the patient who comes in with meningitis. If

you don't use it in this fashion, I think that we are going to end

up with a lot of ceftriaxone resistance, and you are going to

have a lot of patients for which we have no antibiotics. So use

the narrowest spectrum possible.

The ideal antibiotic would be one that would be broad enough

to cover everything we want to cover, but very narrow to also

not cause resistance. It would have a very good absorption. It

would have a long half life, preferably that could be given in a

once a day or b.i.d. dosing. I actually prefer a b.i.d. dosing

schedule. Once a day, if a patient forgets to take it, then you

could be without an antibiotic for a long period of time. I want an

antibiotic that has no side effects. I want one that is very cheap

and one that has a great taste that the child will actually say,

Mom. It s my antibiotic time. I want to take it. Unfortunately, it

doesn t exist. There is no perfect antibiotic. Unfortunately, there

are good antibiotics or there are better antibiotics, but there is

no perfect one. There is no magical antibiotic for every infection.



8

Penicillins

Agent Activity Clinical Uses

Penicillin G oral anaerobes Gp A streptococcus

pharyngitis

Penicillin V streptococci RF prophylaxis

Benzathine Eikenella Syphilis

Procaine Pasteurella

Treponema

aspiration

pathogen specific

The different classes of antibiotics. I am starting with the

penicillins and they are divided into the name of the antibiotic,

their activity and then the clinical uses. Penicillin is a very useful

antibiotic still. Very active against oral anaerobes, streptococci

and the treatment of choice for Eikenella infections. Eikenella

is an organism that lives in the mouth, and with boxers or

people who punch each other in the mouth, you can get

infections with Eikenella in the hand. That is not uncommon.

Occasionally bites from animals can have Eikenella.

Pasteurella. Bites from animals. Penicillin is also for syphilis.

Penicillin is still very useful. We use it as the treatment of

choice for group A strep pharyngitis. We use it for rheumatic

fever prophylaxis. It is the therapy of choice for syphilis. For

aspiration pneumonia, it is still a very good agent to use initially

in that patient that may have aspirated in the community, not

the patient that has aspirated and has hospital acquired

organisms. But definitely, that patient coming from the commu

nity with an aspiration pneumonia. If you have a specific

infection with any of these pathogens, then that is when you

would use the penicillin.



9

Penicillin - Adverse Effects

Allergic reactions

Hemolytic anemia

Interstitial nephritis

Seizures and hyperkalemia in patients with underlying renal

disease

Adverse effects. The one that you most commonly hear about

is allergic reactions. A lot of people say that they are penicillin

allergic. I think that if you are penicillin allergic, you re really

going to take out all of the penicillins and most of the

cephalosporins if you are truly allergic with anaphylaxis. So

when the patient says they had a rash from penicillin or a rash

from amoxicillin, I investigate it further. I would hesitate to label

a patient as allergic to penicillin. Is it hives, not hives? I try to

bring pictures so the patient can see if it was hives or not. Or

was there wheezing, no wheezing? Was it true anaphylaxis? Try

to limit the labeling of patients as penicillin allergic if they just

had a rash.



10

Penicillinase-Resistant Penicillins

Agents Activity Clinical Uses

Methicillin

Nafcillin

Oxacillin

Cloxacillin

Dicloxacillin

S. aureus

S. epidermidis

less active for

penicillin suscepti-

ble bacteria

S. aureus infec

tions

After the penicillins were introduced, Staph aureus became very

rapidly resistant to penicillin. The penicillinase-resistant

penicillins were developed basically for treatment of Staph

aureus infections. These include methicillin, nafcillin, oxacillin

and oral agents such as cloxacillin and dicloxacillin. Their

activity is for Staph aureus. Occasionally, some Staph

epidermidis may be susceptible but the penicillinase resistant

penicillins are less active against penicillin susceptible bacteria,

especially anaerobes. The clinical uses are limited to Staph

aureus infections.



11

Adverse Effects of Penicillinase Resis-

tant Penicillins

Neutropenia - dose and duration related

Cholestasis and cholestatic jaundice

Interstitial nephritis - most common with methicillin

Poor palatability of oral preparations (dicloxacillin and

cloxacillin)

Adverse effects. Neutropenia is very common and it really

depends on how prolonged the usage is. In patients that we

treat for four or six weeks for Staph aureus osteomyelitis with

nafcillin, we frequently see neutropenias, and we have to stop

that agent and switch to something different like clindamycin.

So you should look for neutropenia with prolonged use. If it is

going to be a short course, it is very unlikely to produce

neutropenia. The other one that I just wanted to mention is

interstitial nephritis which is much more common with methicillin

than it is with nafcillin or oxacillin. Methicillin may not be

available any more.

The oral preparations of dicloxacillin and cloxacillin. There is no

child who has taste buds that would actually take this prepara-

tion because it tastes so terrible. The use of dicloxacillin and

cloxacillin is limited to the adolescent who can take a pill and

not worry about an aftertaste. But in a child, this becomes a

very big problem because they are really terrible tasting.



12

Aminopenicillins

Agents Activity Clinical Uses

Ampicillin

Amoxicillin

Penicillin suscep

tible

Some GNR

Enterococcus

Listeria

H influenzae

Borrelia

Otitis media

Sinusitis

UTI

Lyme disease

The aminopenicillins, ampicillin and amoxicillin, were developed

so that they could have a broader spectrum of activity than

penicillin. This broader spectrum includes all of the penicillin

susceptible ones, some gram negative rods, such as E. coli or

occasionally Proteus, enterococcus that is not resistant,

Listeria. Listeria in the neonate can cause infection in neonatal

meningitis. You cannot use a cephalosporin alone for neonatal

meningitis because Listeria would not respond. So ampicillin is

the drug of choice for Listeria. If H. influenza is susceptible, you

could use ampicillin, although we know that there is increasing

resistance. For Lyme disease amoxicillin is a good choice.

Clinical uses for amoxicillin. We know it is the drug of choice for

otitis and sinusitis. If you have an E. coli that is susceptible in

the urinary tract or you have enterococcal urinary tract infection,

it is useful, although most people would not start with amoxicillin

for a UTI because E. coli is becoming amoxicillin resistant and

is the most frequent cause of UTI. Lyme disease is one of the

uses you can use it for.



13

Adverse Effects of Aminopenicillins

Allergic reactions

Non-allergic mediated rashes associated with viral infections,

particularly EBV

Diarrhea

C difficile colitis

Seizures in patients with renal disease

The adverse effects are really non-allergic mediated rashes.

The rash from amoxicillin, if it is not hives, is usually not an

allergy. Remember that it is particularly evident in patients with

EBV. It can cause diarrhea. It can cause C. difficile. Seizures

are a very rare side effect.



14

Extended Spectrum Penicillins

Agents Activity Clinical Uses

Mezlocillin

Piperacillinn

Ticarcillin

Carbenicillin

Ampicillin suscep

tible

More GNR

Pseudomonas

GNR infection

Extended spectrum penicillins cover more Gram-negative rod

infections, and these include, mezlocillin, piperacillin, ticarcillin

and carbenicillin. Their activity is the same as ampicillin but they

include more Gram negative rods, and particularly piperacillin

and ticarcillin and orally carbenicillin are quite good for Pseudo-

monas infections if they are susceptible. So their clinical uses

are really Gram-negative rod infections. These are frequently

antibiotics that are used in hospitalized patients, except for

carbenicillin which is a p.o. preparation.



15

Adverse Effects of Extended Spectrum

Penicillins

Allergic reactions

Thrombophlebitis

High sodium load

Hypokalemia

Platelet dysfunction and bleeding

The extended spectrum penicillin have the same kind of

adverse profile. Ticarcillin has a high sodium load so we don't

use it in patients that have congenital heart disease or any

propensity to go into failure. Ticarcillin can also cause platelet

dysfunction and bleeding even with a normal platelet count.



16

Penicillins + Beta Lactamase Inhibitor

Agents Activity Clinical Uses

Amoxicillin +

clavulanate

ticarcillin +

clavulanate

Ampicillin +

sulbactam

Piperacillin +

tazobactam

Ampicillin suscep

tible

S. aureus

Anaerobes

H influenzae

M catarrhalis

Polymicrobic In

fections

Bites

Otitis media

Sinusitis

Nosocomial infec-

tions

Penicillin plus a beta lactamase inhibitor. We have come up

with amoxicillin + clavulanate, ticarcillin + clavulanate, ampicillin

+ sulbactam and piperacillin + tazobactam. These are all

ampicillin susceptible, but because of the clavulanate and the

addition of this beta-lactamase inhibitor, they get Staph aureus

as well as very good anaerobe coverage. Then because we

have ampicillin and the beta-lactamase, we now get H. influ-

enza and Moraxella catarrhalis included in the spectrum. The

clinical uses are usually polymicrobic infections. One of the

major clinical uses in pediatrics is bites. So that for cat bites,

extensive dog bites and even human bites, Augmentin or one

of these extended spectrum plus the beta-lactamase inhibitors

are the ones that are used in the hospital as well for bites. It is

a second line agent for otitis media and sinusitis. And they can

be used for nosocomial infection for Gram-negative rods that

are susceptible, or in patients infected with Gram-negative rods

plus Staph aureus and anaerobes, as in the hospitalized patient

who may have an aspiration pneumonia.



17

Adverse Effects of Penicillin +Beta

Lactamase Inhibitors

Gastrointestinal effects, especially diarrhea

All adverse reactions of the penicillin component can occur with

combinations

The adverse effects are an increased incidence of diarrhea.

Then remember that all the adverse effects of penicillin can

occur with the combination of preparations.



18

Cephalosporins

Cephalosporins are divided into first, second and third genera-

tions.



19

First Generation Cephalosporins

Excellent activity against Gram-positive organisms

Good activity against enteric Gram-negative bacilli

No CNS penetration

The first generations have excellent activity against Gram

positive organisms and their mainstay is for Staph aureus

infections. They have okay activity against enteric Gram

negative bacilli, so occasionally you will see that there is an E.

coli or Klebsiella that s susceptible to Keflex. But remember that

first generation agents have no central nervous system penetra-

tion so do not use Ancef or Keflex if meningitis is a possibility.

That is one of the major reasons we use them very infrequently

in neonates or preterm neonates where we can't easily exclude

central nervous system infection.



20

Second Generation Cephalosporins

Retain activity against Gram-positives

Enhanced activity against Gram-negatives

Some with good anaerobic coverage

Limited CNS penetration

Second generation cephalosporins retain activity against Staph

aureus and the Gram-positives. They have enhanced activity

against Gram-negatives, especially Hemophilus and Moraxella.

Some of them, especially cefoxitin, have good anaerobic

coverage and you may see them used for pelvic inflammatory

disease or for abdominal infections because of their anaerobic

coverage. Second generation cephalosporins have limited

central nervous system penetration and should not be used for

meningitis.



21

Third Generation Cephalosporins

Decreased activity against Gram-positives

Much enhanced activity against Gram-negatives

Some with antipseudomonal activity

Excellent CNS penetration

The third generations have much decreased activity against the

Gram-positive, so we do not use the third generation

cephalosporins, like cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, for infections

that are due to Staph aureus. They have much enhanced

activity against Gram-negatives. Some, like ceftazidime

particularly, have anti Pseudomonal activity and they have

excellent CNS penetration. Therefore, that is why we use them

for meningitis.



22

First Generation Cephalosporins

Agents Activity Clinical Uses

cephalothin

cephalexin

cefazolin

cefadroxil

Penicillin suscep

tible

S. aureus

GNR (some)

S. aureus infec

tions

First generation cephalosporins include cephalexin (Keflex),

cefazolin (Ancef) and cefadroxil (Duricef) with b.i.d. preparation.

Their activity is really for Staph aureus. Their clinical uses are

for Staph aureus. Remember that group A strep is also suscep-

tible. So for lacerations or cellulitis or osteomyelitis, where you

think Staph aureus is a player, these are good alternative drugs.



23

Second Generation

Activity Clinical Uses

Cefaclor

Cefuroxim

e

Cefprozil

Loracarbe

f

Cefoxitin

1st gen suscep-

tible

H. influenzae

M. catarrhalis

GNR (more)

Anaerobes

Second-line therapy for

otitis media and sinus

itis

Intraabdominal infections

Pelvic inflammatory disease

Second generation cephalosporins include cefaclor, cefuroxime,

cefprozil, loracarbef. They have the activity of the first genera-

tion and they include Hemophilus and Moraxella. Some to a

better degree than others. The clinical uses are really as

second line agents for otitis media and sinusitis. Cefoxitin is a

second generation that has increased activity against

anaerobes, and is used for intra-abdominal infections and pelvic

inflammatory disease.



24

Third Generation Cephalosporins

Agent Activity Clinical Uses

Cefotaxime

Ceftriaxone

Ceftazidime*

GNR

Streptococci

Nosocomial infections

Meningitis

*increased antipseudomonal activity

Third generation cephalosporins include cefotaxime,

ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime. They truly are Gram-negative rod

drugs. They are good for Strep pneumoniae, and that is why we

use them for meningitis. But we are seeing increased resis

tance to cephalosporins and their clinical uses should be

reserved for nosocomial infections and serious meningitis.

Other clinical uses of these can be for Gram-negative rod

infections, such as Salmonella in sickle cell patients or Salmo-

nella infections in general.



25

Oral Third Generation Cephalosporins

Agent Activity Clinical Uses

Cefixime

Ceftibuten

GNR

Poor coverage

against S. aureus,

pneumococcus

Resistant urinary tract infec

tions

Limited pediatric use

Oral third generation cephalosporins include cefixime (Suprax),

ceftibuten (Cedax). Their activity is really very good for Gram

negative rods. They have extraordinarily poor Staph aureus

activity and very poor pneumococcus activity. These basically

should really be used for Gram-negative rod infection. This

limits their pediatric use because otitis, pharyngitis and sinusitis

are not commonly caused by Gram-negative rods. I think that

one of the good uses for these agents is for resistant UTIs. So

our nephrologists use them quite frequently for complicated

UTIs with resistant Gram-negatives that they don't want to put

into the hospital and this is a very good oral alternative. Using

it routinely for otitis and sinusitis in patients where it really has

poor pneumococcal activity really doesn't make much bug-

drug" sense.



26

Fourth Generation Cephalosporins

Agent Activity Clinical Uses

Cefepime S. aureus

GNR

Pseudomonas

Undetermined

Cefepime is a new fourth generation. I really have not used it at

all yet. Its activity is said to be good for Staph aureus, Gram

negative rods and for Pseudomonas and I am really not sure

what clinical uses it will have in pediatrics. This is really a

relatively new drug that we don't have experience with.



27

Oral Cephalosporin Activity

PSP PRP H/M GAS SA

Cepha

lexin

Keflex + + +

Cefad

roxil

Durice

f

+ + +

Cefpr

ozil

Cefzil + +/ + +

Cefacl

or

Ceclor + +/ +

Cefur

oxime

Ceftin + + + +

Cefpo

doxim

e

Vantin + + + +/

Lorac

arbef

Lorabi

d

+ +/ +

Cefixi

me

Supra

x

+/-+ +

Ceftib

uten

Cedax +/ + +

Activity of antibiotics for otitis. Really you have to distinguish

between all of these oral cephalosporins and pick the ones that

you think have the best activity for the organisms that are

prevalent in your community and make a decision according to

that. Don t switch between these for second line drugs. There

is really no reason to switch. New information on Cedax

indicates that it is not very good for pneumococcus, so I think

it had a plus there before. You want to change that to a +/- as

well as cefixime. Loracarbef and Cefzil as well as cefaclor

really are +/- against Hemophilus and none of them are

better than high dose amoxicillin for resistant

pneumococcus.



28

Adverse Effects of Cephalosporins

Allergic reactions - 15% cross reactivity in penicillin allergic

patients

Serum sickness reaction (cefaclor)

Interstitial nephritis

Autoimmune thrombocytopenia

Biliary cholestasis and cholelithiasis (ceftriaxone)

Fungal overgrowth and infections

The adverse effects of cephalosporins. Cross reactivity may be

as high as 15% with penicillin allergic patients. It is said that the

cross reactivity is much greater with first generation

cephalosporins than with second generations and thought to be

really not very high at all in third generations. I am very conser

vative. If the patient truly has an anaphylaxis to penicillin I really

do not use any of the cephalosporins. However, some people

say that you could very safely use the third generations

because they are so different. Ceftriaxone is very unique in that

it causes biliary cholestasis and cholelithiasis. Then I really

want to point out that these are very a broad spectrum agents,

especially the third generations. We do see a lot of fungal

overgrowth and this may be a precipitating factor of the

nosocomial fungal infections in patients who are hospitalized.



29

Disadvantages of Cephalosporins

Not cure all drugs

Pneumococci may be resistant

Increasing resistant of hospital GNR

Broad spectrum

May lead to changes in normal flora and superinfection

High cost

Disadvantages. Pneumococci may be resistant. There is

increasing resistance of some hospital Gram-negative rods

such as Enterobacteriaceae, that are hospital acquired flora

may be resistant to cephalosporins. They are very broad

spectrum. They lead to especially fungal superinfection and

they are relatively high cost.



30

Causes of Cephalosporin Failure

Methicillin resistant S. aureus

Coagulase negative Staphylococcus

Listeria monocytogenes

Enterococcus spp.

C. difficile

Rickettsia

Chlamydia

Cephalosporin failure. The instances where it can fail include

methicillin-resistant Staph aureus or coagulase negative

Staphylococcus infections because you have an indwelling

catheter or a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Listeria is resistant. For

Enterococcus they are not good at all. C. difficile and then

Rocky Mountain Spotted fever and chlamydia, especially

chlamydia pneumonia.



31

Carbapenems

Agent Activity Clinical Uses

Imipenem

Meropenem

Ceftriaxone

susceptible

Resistant GNR

anaerobes

Resistant infec-

tions

Carbapenems. Imipenem, and meropenem are really extraordi

narily broad spectrum drugs that have their use in pediatrics

really for resistant infections and particularly have been used for

meningitis. For pneumococcus that is resistant to ceftriaxone,

sometimes they are susceptible to imipenem or to meropenem.

Its activity is really against ceftriaxone susceptible plus resistant

Gram-negative rods as well as anaerobes.



32

Adverse Effects of Carbapenems

Allergic reactions - cross reactivity in PCN allergic parents

Diarrhea

Lowers seizure threshold (imipenem)

Adverse effects are that if you are penicillin allergic you are

going to be allergic to meropenem and imipenem. So it is not an

alternative for the penicillin allergic patient. Remember that

imipenem lowers the seizure threshold so that for use in

meningitis this might become a problem and it is better to use

meropenem in those instances. It is really nice to reserve this

for when you have a ceftriaxone resistant organism, this is a

good alternative.



33

Macrolides

Erythromycin

Clarithromycin

Azithromycin

Roxithromycin

Dirithromycin

Macrolides. Erythromycin is the prototype but now we have

clarithromycin, azithromycin. There is increasing use of

clarithromycin and azithromycin.



34

Erythromycin - Activity

Spectrum Clinical Uses

Penicillin susceptible

S. aureus

Mycoplasma

Legionella

B. pertussis

Campylobacter

Chlamydia

Penicillin allergic ptatients

Specific pathogens

The spectrum of activity. It is the penicillin susceptible organ-

isms. Then you have Staph aureus, although there is an

increase in Staph aureus that is resistant to erythromycin and

if they're resistant to erythromycin, they're going to be resistant

to azithromycin and clarithromycin as well. Organisms that are

covered include Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella which is

an infrequent cause of infection in children but may occasionally

happen, Pertussis. It is our drug of choice for pertussis,

Campylobacter, and also chlamydia pneumoniae. So the

erythromycins are really good alternatives. The clinical uses are

for penicillin allergic patients for pharyngitis. They can be used

as second line agents for otitis and sinusitis and against,

specific pathogens, it is the drug of choice for pertussis

infections.



35

Macrolides - Adverse Effects

Gastrointestinal disturbances

Hepatotoxicity

IV erythromycin - cardiotoxicity hepatotoxicity venous irritation

Many drug interactions

The adverse effects are really gastrointestinal disturbances and

this is why the new macrolides exist. Because clarithromycin

and azithromycin have less gastrointestinal intolerance than

erythromycin. They may be hepatotoxic and remember that IV

erythromycin is a very dangerous drug to use. It can be

cardiotoxic and hepatotoxic and causes a lot of venous irritation.

It should not be given IV unless you have an infectious disease

consult and a very good reason such as Legionella infection in

a child. Remember that there are many drug interactions with

the erythromycins and these interactions don't go away be-

cause you are using the newer preparations. It is terrible for

cyclosporin levels but it also interacts with theophylline.



36

New Macrolides

Activity Clinical Uses

Clarithromyc

in

azithromycin

Erythromycin sus

ceptible

H influenzae

M catarrhalis

Non-tuberculous

mycobacterium

Toxoplasma

Cryptosporidium

N gonorrhoeae

Second line therapy

for otitis media and

sinusitis

Pathogen specific

Clarithromycin and azithromycin. Their activity is that of

erythromycin susceptible. They have better Hemophilus and

Moraxella coverage than penicillin, but they may not achieve

adequate middle ear concentrations. It is very interesting that

this is a very good use for non-tuberculous mycobacteria.

Those patients that have cervical lymphadenitis that we think

are secondary to non-tuberculous, might respond to

clarithromycin. I may use clarithromycin initially for these

patients. Also in patients with HIV with MAI, clarithromycin is a

good drug. Toxoplasma also in immunocompromised patients.

Azithromycin has the same activity in Cryptosporidium and

gonorrhea. The clinical uses are really as second line agents for

otitis and sinusitis and for pathogen specific infections.



37

Advantages of New Macrolides

Retain spectrum of activity of erythromycin

Increased spectrum against H. influenzae and nontuberculous

mycobacteria

Improved pharmacokinetics

Decreased gastrointestinal side effects

The advantages are that they retain the spectrum of

erythromycin, they increase the spectrum against these things,

they have improved pharmacokinetics, but really the main

advantage of clarithromycin and azithromycin is in their dosing

and their improvement in altered side effects. So that b.i.d. or

once a day dosing is preferable to four times a day dosing, and

the decrease in side effects is really the major advantage.



38

Disadvantages New Macrolides

Broader spectrum of activity

Does not broaden spectrum for erythromycin resistant

pneumococcus

High cost

Adverse effect of clarithromycin headache, neurologic changes

The disadvantage is that they have a broader spectrum of

activity. It does not really broaden the spectrum for

erythromycin resistant pneumococcus. So, if your

pneumococcus is resistant to erythromycin, it is equally

resistant to clarithromycin and azithromycin. The relative cost

is higher, and azithromycin is extraordinarily expensive, but

because it s been used for half of the time for five days rather

than the usual 10 day course, it is pretty equivalent to

clarithromycin, but it is about 10 or 12 times higher in cost than

erythromycin. The uncommon effects of clarithromycin such as

headache and neurologic changes are uncommon but can

occur.



39

Clindamycin

Activity Clinical Uses

PCN susceptible

S. aureus

Anaerobes

Toxoplasma

No H. influenzae

or M.

catarrhalis

Penicillin allergic

Resistant pneumococci

Intraabdominal infections

Toxoplasmosis

Clindamycin. Clindamycin is a drug that we had not used

previously as much as we are using now, but now with resistant

infections, we are seeing new uses for clindamycin. It has

activity against penicillin susceptible organisms, Staph aureus,

anaerobes, Toxoplasma. It doesn't have activity against

Hemophilus or Moraxella catarrhalis. Especially in bite wounds,

it doesn't cover Eikenella, so that it cannot be used as a single

agent in this. That is why we use amoxicillin-clavulanate or the

combination ones for bite wounds. The clinical uses of

clindamycin are in the penicillin allergic, in the resistant

pneumococcal infection, intra-abdominal infections, not alone

but with other Gram negative rod agents, and then in patients

with toxoplasmosis.



40

Adverse Effects of Clindamycin

Clostridium difficile colitis

Hepatotoxicity

Stevens-Johnson syndrome

Eosinophilia

Clindamycin adverse effects are C. difficile colitis. It definitely

has been associated with colitis, but I am not really sure that it

is more associated than any of the other antibiotics. Amoxicillin

is the one that is used the most, and amoxicillin is the antibiotic

that is most associated with C. difficile by the sheer numbers of

its usage. Clindamycin can cause hepatotoxicity. It can cause

Stevens-Johnson, and it may cause eosinophilia. Overall, it is

used a lot and it is a safe alternative.



41

Quinolones

Nalidixic Acid

Ciprofloxacin

Norfloxacin

Quinolones have been increasingly used in pediatrics, and

although they are not approved for use in pediatrics, we do

have an increasing experience with the quinolones and may

choose them as alternatives in some patients for specific

reasons.



42

Quinolones

Spectrum of Activity

Gram positives +/- S. pneumoniae

+/- S. aureus

Gram negatives Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Other Chlamydia, Mycoplasma,

Mycobacterium, Bartonella,

Plasmodium

They are not wonderful for pneumococcus or for Staph aureus,

these are not drugs for resistant pneumococcal infections or for

Staph aureus infections. But they are good for Gram negatives,

particularly Pseudomonas. That is one of the areas of major

use is as an outpatient drug for pseudomonal infection. Other

uses include Bartonella henslae which is the agent of cat

scratch disease.



43

Potential Uses of Quinolones

Pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis

Complicated urinary tract infections

Chronic suppurative otitis media

Complicated osteomyelitis

Resistant nosocomial infections

Prophylaxis for N. meningitidis

Gastrointestinal infections

The potential uses for the quinolones. We have lots of experi

ence in the cystic fibrosis patients, with very little adverse

effects that we can attribute to the quinolones. Complicated

urinary tract infections caused by Gram-negative rods that are

resistant to other drugs. For chronic suppurative otitis media

when Pseudomonas may be one of the pathogens. Compli

cated osteomyelitis such as that associated with decubital

ulcers with Gram-negative rods and where resistant Pseudomo

nas may be a problem. Resistant infections. There are theoreti

cal risks of growth problems with quinolones. It is also used for

gastrointestinal infections such as Salmonella.



44

Adverse Effects of Quinolones

Diarrhea

Arthralgias and tendon rupture

Increased liver enzymes

Possible effect human cartilage growth

Adverse effects. Quinolones do cause diarrhea. It has been

reported to cause arthralgias and there was recently a report of

an Achilles tendon rupture associated with quinolone use,

particularly ciprofloxacin. But the question of the effect on

human cartilage growth is becoming more and more of a

question. This is definitely seen in animals, but in cystic fibrosis

patients where we use large quantities of ciprofloxacin, in doing

MRIs of their joints there is really no detectable damage to the

cartilage. So I think we are getting more and more comfortable

with quinolones. Obviously not as a first choice. But their

potential uses in pediatrics are going to be becoming more and

more prevalent.



45

Sulfonamides

Agent Activity Clinical Uses

TMP/sulfamethoxaz

ole (Bactrim, Septra)

PCN susceptible,

except Gp A

strep and

anaerobes

GNR Salmonella,

Shigella

H. influenzaee

Pneumocystis

Second-line therapy

for otitis media and

sinusitis

Bacterial enteritis

Pneumocystis

Erythro/sulfamethox

azole Pediazole)

Erythromycin sus

ceptible

H. influenzae

M. catarrhalis

Second-line therapy

for otitis media and

sinusitis

Sulfonamides. TMP/sulfa does not have activity against group

A strep. It has no anaerobic activity at all. The Gram-negative

rods, that it is very good for are Salmonella, shigella,

Hemophilus influenza. It is the drug of choice for Pneumocystis

carinii pneumonia infections. Its clinical uses are as a second

line agent for otitis and sinusitis. For bacterial enteritis and for

Pneumocystis. Erythro/sulfa (Pediazole) takes the activity of all

the erythromycin and increases activity for Hemophilus and

Moraxella. It is a second line agent for otitis and sinusitis.



46

Adverse Effects of Sulfonamides

Gastrointestinal disturbances

Skin rashes - more common in HIV infected patients

Erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome

Adverse effects of the sulfonamides. Skin rashes are very

prominent and are more common in HIV patients than in non-

HIV infected patients. Erythema multiforme and Stevens

Johnson syndrome seem to have a higher association with

sulfonamides than with other antibiotics, although it can occur

with other antibiotics. But there seems to be somewhat of a

higher association with sulfonamides and Stevens-Johnson.



47

Vancomycin

Activity Clinical Uses

PCN susceptible

MRSA

S. epidermidis

Enterococcus sp

C. difficile

pathogen specific

infection of medical devices

Vancomycin. The activity of vancomycin is that it is penicillin

susceptible. It includes methicillin resistant Staph aureus and

is really the best drug for methicillin resistant Staph aureus

infections. It is the drug that we use when Staph epidermidis

infection is thought of, such as in patients with indwelling

devices and indwelling venous catheters. Enterococcus is

usually susceptible, although now we know that enterococcus

has the ability to develop vancomycin resistance, and this is an

increasing problem that is going to becoming even more of a

problem in pediatric institutions. Then we use the oral prepara-

tion for C. difficile. Really the clinical uses are for infection of

medical devices and truly pathogen specific when you have

MRSA or if you have a susceptible Enterococcus. The routine

use of vancomycin for C. difficile colitis is not recommended

because we do not want to encourage Enterococcus resistance.

Metronidazole should be used instead.



48

Adverse Effects of Vancomycin

Ototoxicity - in patients with renal disease or concurrent

aminoglycosides

Red man syndrome

Hypotension associated with infusion

The infusion of the intravenous vancomycin can cause a red

man syndrome that is not an allergy. It responds very nicely to

decreasing the rate of infusion or stopping it for a little bit and

starting up again at a lower rate. It also responds nicely to

antihistamines. There have been patients with hypotension

associated with the infusion, which readily gets better with

stopping it.



49

Aminoglycosides

Agents Activity Clinical Uses

Gentamicin

Netilmicin

GNR GNR infections

Amikacin Resistant GNR Hospital GNR

Tobramycin P. aeruginosa

Aminoglycosides. Their activity is for Gram-negative rods and

Gram-negative rods only. It is a little bit better for resistant

Gram-negative rods, so some are no longer using gentamicin

but have switched to amikacin because they have a problem

with a particular Gram-negative rod that may be resistant.

Tobramycin is specific for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. They are

used for Gram-negative rod infections, and apart from urinary

tract infections, should not be used as the sole agent.



50

Adverse Effects of Aminoglycosides

Nephrotoxicity

Ototoxicity

Reversible neuromuscular blockade

Need to monitor levels

Adverse effects. They have nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. It can

cause neuromuscular blockade, which is an important factor in

patients with botulism because this small neuromuscular

blockade becomes clinically significant in those patients, and it

may precipitate respiratory arrest in that patient. There is new

information that once daily dosing of aminoglycosides may be

as effective as the three times a day dosing, with less side

effects. More pediatric information is coming forward with that.



51

Tetracyclines

Agents Activity Clinical Uses

Tetracycline

Doxycycline

Chlamydia

Mycoplasma

Rickett-

sia/Ehrlichia

Borrelia

Brucella,

Francisella

Propionobacteria

Eikenella

Pathogen specific

Not for Gp A

Strep

Tetracyclines are really pathogen specific. It includes very

broad pathogens that are kind of unusual. It really is not for

group A streptococcus.



52

Adverse Effects of Tetracycline

Gastrointestinal disturbances

Deposition of drug in bones and teeth

Contraindicated in children <8 years

Photosensitivity

Hepatotoxicity - especially with IV tetracycline

Bacterial overgrowth

They are not used often in pediatric patients because they are

contraindicated because they deposit in bones and teeth and

stain the teeth. Remember if you are using it for patients for

acne, tell them that it causes photosensitivity so that they can

get ready when they get out into the sun.



53

Chloramphenicol

Activity Clinical Uses

Penicillin susceptible

H. influenzae

Anaerobes

Salmonella

Shigella

Rickettsia

Rocky mountain spotted fe

ver in children less than 8

years old

Chloramphenicol is something that has a very good spectrum

activity, but it is not used very much because we have very

good alternatives. But remember one of the main clinical uses

is for Rocky Mountain Spotted fever in that patient that is less

than eight years of age. There have been failures when it has

been used for resistant pneumococcus despite its good in vitro

activity. So it is not recommended.



54

Adverse Effects of Chloramphenicol

Idiosyncratic aplastic anemia

Bone marrow suppression

Gray baby syndrome

Hepatotoxicity

Need to monitor levels

Adverse effects include bone marrow suppression and aplastic

anemia; these have precluded its use in pediatrics.



55

Rifampin

Activity Clinical Uses

S. aureus

Streptococci

N. meningitidis

H. influenzae

Mycobacterium

Synergy device infection

Mycobacterial infection

Prophylaxis for H. influenzae

and N. meningitides

Rifabutin has better activity for MAI than rifampin

Rifampin. We use it a lot as synergistic for microbacterial

infections and prophylaxis. It really should not be used to treat

infections alone because organisms become rapidly resistant

to rifampin.



56

Rifamycins - Adverse Effects

Hepatotoxicity especially with other drugs or pre-existing

liver disease

Changes color of all body secretions to orange

It does change the color of all body secretions. It makes them

a bright orange. That is how you know the patient is getting

rifampin but you have to warn the patient about this.



57

Metronidazole

Activity Clinical Uses

Anaerobes

G. vaginalis

Entamoeba

Trichomonas

Giardia

Anaerobic infections

C. difficile

Pathogen specific

Metronidazole is good for anaerobes, and that includes all of

these organisms as well as Giardia. Its clinical uses are

anaerobic infections, C. difficile, and pathogen specific infec

tions.



58

Adverse Effects of Metronidazole

Neurotoxicity

Peripheral neuropathy

Gastrointestinal disturbances

Metallic taste

Mutagenic and carcinogenic in lab animals

A peripheral neuropathy and neurotoxicity can occur, which is

more frequent in adults. I has a metallic taste. We use it quite

frequently for anaerobes and for C. difficile colitis.



59

References

1. Jacobs RF, Schutze GE, Young RA, et al. Antimicrobial

Agents In: Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious

Diseases. Eds: Long SS, Pickering LK, Prober CG New

York, Churchill Livingstone 1997

2. Spect WT, Blumer I (eds). The Pediatric Clinics of North

America: Symposium of Anti-Infective Therapy. Philadel

phia, WB Saunders Co, 1983

3. Smith AL (ed). Antibiotic Update. Pediatric Annals 1993;

22. 155-200